Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


U.S. slapped with $1.01B retaliatory tariff over COOL label

On May 19, 2015, Digital Journal reported the WTO had, for the fourth time, upheld a complaint by Canada and Mexico about U.S. laws requiring retailers to label meat with the country where the animal was born, raised and slaughtered. Canada and Mexico charged that the law was discriminatory against imported meats.

At that time, there was an urgency expressed by lawmakers to repeal the COOL law, which has been in effect since 2009. Many congressmen said the law was a “failed experiment,” and most congressmen were afraid of a protracted trade war developing. Yet all these many months since that rush to make amends, Congress has, as usual, balked.

The Monday announcement by WTO
The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the WTO ruled on Monday that Canada can slap around $781 million in tariffs on U.S. products and Mexico can apply about $228 million. In its decision in May, the WTO said the U.S. was putting “a disproportionate burden on producers and processors of livestock that cannot be explained by the need to provide origin information to consumers.”

The ruling not only applies to livestock produced in the U.S., but to fish, shellfish, fresh and frozen fruits and vegetables and certain nuts. It is interesting to note that industry groups were successful in June in getting the House of Representatives to repeal the COOL law, but the Senate has never taken any action on the law, according to Capital Press.

Why the COOL law must be ended
The U.S. got off easy with the ruling because Canada and Mexico had originally asked for $3 billion in retaliatory tariffs. Luckily, WTO used a different way of calculating the totals. Canada has already said possible targets for retaliatory tariffs could include foods like frozen orange juice, ketchup and of course, beef. Also, on the list are stainless steel pipes and tubes, swivel chairs and mattresses.

But while the livestock industry is hoping the Senate will get the COOL law repealed, saying it has been a financial burden to the industry, consumers and some farm groups are against its repeal. The WTO’s decision “has undermined U.S. sovereignty and the right of American consumers to know the origin of their food,” said Roger Johnson, president of the National Farmers Union.

Randy Gordon, the president of the National Grain and Feed Association feels different about the labeling law. He is thinking more about our world trade agreements and the new Trans-Pacific Partnership and other initiatives. He said, “A full repeal of COOL is the only policy option available that unquestionably would prevent the imposition of sanctions and the economic damage that would result,” reports Food Safety News.

Written By

Karen Graham is Digital Journal's Editor-at-Large for environmental news. Karen's view of what is happening in our world is colored by her love of history and how the past influences events taking place today. Her belief in man's part in the care of the planet and our environment has led her to focus on the need for action in dealing with climate change. It was said by Geoffrey C. Ward, "Journalism is merely history's first draft." Everyone who writes about what is happening today is indeed, writing a small part of our history.

You may also like:


The war in Ukraine is set to loom large over the World Health Assembly on Sunday - Copyright AFP FADEL SENNANina LarsonThe Ukraine war...


Jose Charo, who heads the Beirut office of Swiss-based Passport Legacy, says Lebanese now make up a quarter of the company's clientele - Copyright...


China's crackdown on Muslim minorities in Xinjiang will return to the spotlight next week when Beijing hosts the UN human rights chief.


The carcasses of charred buildings stand amid the lush greenery in what remains of the once bustling Ukrainian port city of Mariupol.