Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

World

Op-Ed: Idaho’s wolf-killing board spending $4,600 per wolf

But that wasn’t all they wanted to report. No, not by a long shot. They also were asking for more money so they can “maintain” an operating budget, even though they anticipate a $130,000 surplus at the end of June, 2015. They have got to be kidding, of course, right?

Board member Carl Rey told lawmakers the Wolf Depredation Control Board had spent about a third of their $400,000 budget over the past six months in killing 31 wolves, all attacking livestock. That comes to a grand total of $4,600 per wolf. They must have been using pure platinum hollow points.

The Joint Finance-Appropriations Committee begged off on making a decision right then, but said it would provide a recommendation in the coming weeks after hearing from other state agencies and departments. Idaho Governor Butch Otter signed the bill forming the Wolf Depredation Control Board March 27, 2014. The board was placed within the governor’s office with a fund of $400,000, taken from general tax funds as well as funds from hunting and fishing licences.

Critics of the formation of the Wolf Depredation Control Board and Idaho’s annual wolf-killing derby have consistently been ignored by state officials and wolf-killing derby officials. The first derby was held in December, 2013, despite outrage from people all over the globe, as reported in Digital Journal in Sept. 2014.

But here is the real interesting thing about this state-sanctioned wolf killing fiasco – Idaho’s wolf population has been steadily decreasing since 2009, when they were first taken off the Endangered Species Act. It was only through the hard campaigning and lawsuits by wildlife groups that the wolves were put back on the list by order of a federal judge in 2010.

Then, in 2011, Congress surprised everyone by taking the wolves off the list again. Strange? Yes, it is. What is even worse is the fact that in 2014, the wolf population in Idaho has dropped from a high of 850 to about 480 wolves. Under the Endangered Species Act, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is supposed to monitor the wolf population for a period of five years. Now, the federal agency is out of the picture and says it won’t step in until the population drops to 150 wolves.

It all comes down to Carl Rey saying they need full funding because they expect to kill a lot more wolves this spring and summer when “wolves are more likely to go after cattle and sheep.” Rey also mentioned that 2014 had an abnormally low number of livestock attacks, but he considered that an anomaly. He added, “We think we’re going to need every dime of that money before this is over.” Let’s see now, at $400,000, they can slaughter about 87 more wolves at $4,600 a shot.

Written By

Karen Graham is Digital Journal's Editor-at-Large for environmental news. Karen's view of what is happening in our world is colored by her love of history and how the past influences events taking place today. Her belief in man's part in the care of the planet and our environment has led her to focus on the need for action in dealing with climate change. It was said by Geoffrey C. Ward, "Journalism is merely history's first draft." Everyone who writes about what is happening today is indeed, writing a small part of our history.

You may also like:

Life

Environment Canada has issued an unprecedented "red alert" for parts of British Columbia as the province braces for additional rain.

World

Seventy-one people were killed in the crash. Follmann, now 29 years old, is one of six who survived -- though he lost his right...

Life

British PM Boris Johnson announced further measures the government is taking to curb the spread of coronavirus' Omicron variant.

World

France hosts a meeting of European ministers on Sunday to discuss ways to stop migrants crossing the Channel in dinghies.