Opinions expressed by Digital Journal contributors are their own.
If you’ve ever watched a Gen Z student juggle a TikTok tutorial, a YouTube explainer, and an AI-powered study guide all while sipping an iced matcha, it’s easy to assume they’re just distracted. But look closer, and you’ll see something else: they’re adapting. Fast. And they’re not afraid to ditch the old ways of learning to build something that actually works for them.
For those who came of age with chalkboards, dial-up, and clunky desktop towers, it can be tempting to roll our eyes at short attention spans and shortcut culture. But Gen Z isn’t lazy. They’re resourceful. And they’re helping redefine how we approach education in an era of digital abundance.
To better understand these shifting trends, we sat down with Joseph Wilson, co-founder of legal education platform Studicata. As someone deeply embedded in the intersection of tech and teaching, Wilson has a front-row seat to how Gen Z and Gen Alpha are reshaping education from the ground up.
The rise of visual-first learning
Gen Z and Gen Alpha are true digital natives, raised on screens and streaming from their earliest memories. “Unlike Millennials, who witnessed the rise of the internet, they were raised from early childhood with iPads, YouTube, and streaming platforms,” says Wilson. “Their entire learning experience has been shaped by screens and video, making video-based education a natural fit.”
It shows. These learners often default to video as their first stop when trying to grasp new concepts. From chemistry crash courses on TikTok to history deep dives on YouTube, both short-form and long-form video content serve as their primary learning tools.
And while older generations might view this as a lack of discipline, educators are beginning to see the opportunity. Video isn’t just convenient—it’s effective. But it also requires careful balance.
More bite-sized doesn’t mean less substance
The shift toward video-based, short-form learning doesn’t necessarily mean we’re headed toward a shallower generation. It just means content needs to be structured differently. According to Wilson, “Traditional 60–90 minute lectures often feel overwhelming by comparison. To keep pace, educators may need to restructure lessons into modular, short-form segments that stack together into larger learning outcomes.”
In other words, micro-lessons aren’t the enemy of mastery. In fact, when done right, they can help learners engage more frequently and with greater focus.
There’s a flip side, though. Wilson warns that relying too heavily on video can flatten learning into one-size-fits-all content. Unlike a live teacher, most videos are static. They can’t adjust to a student’s confusion in real time, nor do they encourage dialogue and deeper critical thinking.
Why Gen Z’s learning habits are more strategic than you think
At first glance, bouncing between apps and content formats might look chaotic. But what Gen Z is doing is strategic. They’re leveraging tools that match their individual learning preferences (audio, visual, interactive) and they’re not afraid to switch gears when something doesn’t work.
“They expect content to be more engaging, interactive, and visually driven,” Wilson notes. “AI fits seamlessly into this landscape by helping deliver educational material in diverse, attention-grabbing formats.”
He’s not just speaking hypothetically. At Studicata, the use of AI is tailored specifically for legal education, summarizing dense case law and complex legal concepts into clear, accessible briefs. This kind of application shows how AI can support—not replace—the educational process.
Bridging the gap between engagement and rigor
One challenge that remains is ensuring that the content Gen Z prefers still leads to deep learning. Just because something is watchable doesn’t mean it’s rigorous. And just because it’s on TikTok doesn’t mean it’s trivial.
“The future of teaching will require a dual strategy: meet students where they are, while also stretching their intellectual capacity,” Wilson explains. That means offering content in dynamic formats, but still demanding analysis, discussion, and synthesis.
This dual approach also puts pressure on teachers, many of whom weren’t trained for this kind of hybrid instruction. As Wilson puts it, “Teachers must design assignments and exams that test genuine understanding rather than simple recall.” That might mean more oral assessments, more collaborative projects, or more in-person discussions where students have to think in real time.
Looking ahead: Personalized learning is the new norm
Two major trends are converging: video dominance and AI integration. Wilson predicts that as each new class of digital natives enters the system, the expectation for flexible, media-rich learning environments will grow.
AI will likely play a key role in personalizing that learning. Already, tools are emerging that can reformat a single lecture into multiple versions based on how a student learns best, whether that’s a text summary, a video explainer, or an audio track. As Wilson notes, “This flexibility allows students to engage with material in the way that best suits their learning style, creating inclusivity at scale in a way that was once too labor-intensive for educators to manage.”
Of course, AI isn’t perfect. Outputs must still be verified, especially in specialized or high-stakes fields. But the promise lies in collaboration: AI as a tool, guided by expert design, and used by students who are trained to question and think critically.
What Millennials (and everyone else) can take away
The generational gap in learning doesn’t have to be a dividing issue. It simply signals a shift. If we stop trying to pull Gen Z back toward old-school models and start learning from the way they adapt, we might just end up with better systems for everyone.
They’re not doing it wrong. They’re doing it differently. And in a world of endless information, maybe being flexible, fast, and format-agnostic is what the future of education requires.
