Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Tech & Science

Revealed: The most invasive apps

A new survey finds the apps with the greatest privacy concerns, with Metas offerings in top spot.

Australia requires big social platforms including Meta, TikTok and YouTube to stop underage users from holding accounts
Australia requires big social platforms including Meta, TikTok and YouTube to stop underage users from holding accounts - Copyright AFP/File STR
Australia requires big social platforms including Meta, TikTok and YouTube to stop underage users from holding accounts - Copyright AFP/File STR

A new study reveals that Instagram and Facebook are the apps that collect the most user data. 

The study was conducted by IT Asset Management Group (IT-AMG), a certified ITAD firm. The company analysed the privacy policies of over 5,000 apps from the Apple App Store. These apps were selected from a broader list of the top 100 apps in each category, with duplicates and those missing data removed. 

To determine which apps are the most invasive, they created an index out of 100 based on 46 indicators including 35 types of data, six purposes for data collection, and five different types of user relationships. The level of privacy intrusion was measured by whether each data type is tracked and linked, tracked, linked, not linked or tracked, and not collected at all, with “tracked and linked” being the most intrusive. 

Top 10 most invasive apps

Rank App Name Total No. Data Types Collected No. Data Types Linked to User No. Data Types Linked & Tracked Index Score (/100) 
= 1 Instagram 32 25 61.47 
= 1 Facebook 32 25 61.47 
3 Grab: Taxi Ride, Food Delivery 27 15 55.57 
= 4 Threads 32 32 54.53 
= 4 Meta Business Suite 32 32 54.53 
= 4 Messenger 32 32 54.53 
7 Nordstrom Rack: Shop Deals 22 18 53.62 
8 Nordstrom 22 17 52.54 
9 Pinterest 29 22 50.06 
10 AE + Aerie 21 16 50.01 

Methodology

1.    Detailed privacy policy data was scraped from all apps on each of the 164 ‘Top 100’ apps lists on the App Store website. After removing apps that appear multiple times, those missing privacy policy data, or those with a very low number of reviews, 5,021 apps remained. 

2.    Up to 35 types of data may be collected from users by each app, with five levels of security implications and six different reasons for collection (see Table 1 below). 

3.    The level of privacy-intrusion can be measured by whether each data type is: (from most to least intrusive) tracked & linked, tracked, linked, not linked or tracked, and not collected at all. 

4.    An index was then compiled using the associated weightings for the 46 indicators listed below (see Table 2). 

5.    The index compares the apps by the level of privacy intrusion by calculating a weighted score out of 100.  

6.    A ranking was then calculated for each app both overall, and within its specific App Store category. 

7.    Each app category was studied, the total number of apps within each category was studied, and the total number of reviews across these apps were found.  

Meta tops the list

As the table above indicates, Instagram and Facebook come in first place with an index score of 61.47 out of 100. Both apps are among the most widely used worldwide and collect 32 out of 35 data types, 25 of which are linked to the user, while seven are linked and tracked to the user. These apps also rank highly because of how invasive they are in collecting sensitive info like physical addresses, devices, and user IDs. This is in stark contrast with other popular entertainment apps such as YouTube and TikTok, which rank 27th and 76th

Coming in third is Grab: Taxi Ride, Food Delivery, with a 55.57 out of 100 score. This app collects 27 data types, eight of which are linked to the user, and 15 are linked and tracked. As a ride-hailing and food delivery app, it collects sensitive information such as payment information and other financial data, as well as precise location and purchase history. 

In fourth place, a three-way tie sees Threads, Meta Business Suite, and Messenger, each scoring 54.53 out of 100. These apps collect 32 data types, and while all are linked to the user, none are tracked.  

Further down the list, Nordstrom Rack: Shop Deals ranks seventh with a score of 53.62, collecting 22 data types, four of which are linked to the user, and 18 are both linked and tracked.  

In eighth place, Nordstrom follows closely with a score of 52.54. It collects 22 data types, five linked to the user and 17 linked and tracked. 

Pinterest is in ninth place with an index score of 50.06. This app collects 29 data types, 22 of which are linked to the user and six of which are linked and tracked. 

Rounding out the top ten is AE + Aerie, short for American Eagle Outfitters, the apparel brand, scoring 50.01 out of 100. This app collects 21 data types, three of which are linked to the user and 16 of which are linked and tracked. 

Of all the apps and categories studied, Photo-Video Apps are the most invasive. Although only 23 were over the minimum review threshold and therefore eligible for the study, the category’s overall score is 38.54 out of 100.  These are followed by Social Networking Apps and Food and Drink Apps. 

Overall, the data highlights just how invasive apps can be, with two of the most frequent and widely used ones, Instagram and Facebook, leading the charge.

Avatar photo
Written By

Dr. Tim Sandle is Digital Journal's Editor-at-Large for science news. Tim specializes in science, technology, environmental, business, and health journalism. He is additionally a practising microbiologist; and an author. He is also interested in history, politics and current affairs.

You may also like:

Business

For the past 30 years, Halina Krauze has sat atop a 15-metre (49-foot) crane surveying the Gdansk shipyard.

Tech & Science

Take off the blindfolds and look where you’re going.

World

Employees sued Kari Lake over the firings, which were temporarily halted last September pending judicial review.

Tech & Science

Space tech investment is experiencing a boom, with private investment reaching a record $12.4 billion in 2025; yet, Europe lags behind.