Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Michigan DUI Attorney Paul J. Tafelski Explains the Difference Between a DUI Public Defender and a Private Lawyer

Michigan DUI attorney Paul J. Tafelski releases a new article (https://www.michigandefenselaw.com/blog/dui-public-defender-vs-private-attorney/) explaining the difference between a DUI public defender and a private lawyer. The lawyer mentions that anyone who is accused of a crime in the United States has the right to an attorney. A famous part of the Miranda warning includes “if you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you.” However, the court will ultimately charge the defendant some fee for use of the public defender.

According to the Michigan DUI attorney, “Michigan does not have a single, unified public defender system. Instead, each county decides on its own how to organize, appoint, and pay attorneys who represent criminal defendants who cannot afford their own lawyer. Historically, it has been a very troubled system. In 2008, the National Legal Aid & Defender Association (NLADA)—a nationwide advocacy group for legal representation of indigent criminal defendants—issued a scathing assessment of Michigan’s patchwork public defender system.”

Michigan DUI attorney

The lawyer explains that the resources and support provided to Michigan’s court-appointed attorneys for indigent defendants have improved. However, court-appointed attorneys for criminal defendants are getting paid lesser than private attorneys. Those who work in organized public defender offices frequently have large caseloads that limit the amount of time they have to devote to each client.

Attorney Paul Tafelski adds that there are a lot of smart and hard-working attorneys out there, but they may not be able to provide a customized defense as private attorneys do. This is because of the amount of work they have to finish. They may also not look for other ways to “win” the case if they feel like it cannot be “won”.

“There is one other significant difference between a private attorney and a public defender. You pay the private attorney out of your own pocket (although many defense attorneys will work with their clients to find ways to manage the cost). But just because you don’t pay a public defender doesn’t mean the defender’s services come free. Not, at least, when you take the potential cost of a DUI conviction into account,” says the DUI lawyer.

Lastly, attorney Paul Tafelski emphasizes the importance of having a skilled lawyer when facing charges of DUII. Having an experienced attorney may be able to help the defendant understand their rights and protect their freedom.

About Michigan Defense Law

Michigan Defense Law is a firm that takes the presumption of innocence very seriously. Every client deserves competent legal representation. No matter if someone is facing a felony or misdemeanor charge, the lawyers at Michigan Defense Law will work hard to vigorously defend the client and achieve the best outcome for them. Call Michigan Defense Law today at (248) 451 2200 to schedule a consultation.

###

For more information about Paul J Tafelski, Michigan Defense Law | Criminal Attorney and DUI Lawyer, contact the company here:

Paul J Tafelski, Michigan Defense Law | Criminal Attorney and DUI Lawyer
Paul J. Tafelski
2484512200
Paul J Tafelski, Michigan Defense Law
2525 S Telegraph Rd suite 100, Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302, United States

Avatar photo
Written By

Press Advantage is a Full-Service Press Release distribution service. Learn more at PressAdvantage.com

You may also like:

World

Taiwan's eastern Hualien region was also the epicentre of a magnitude-7.4 quake in April 3, which caused landslides around the mountainous region - Copyright...

Business

Honda hopes to sell only zero-emission vehicles by 2040, with a goal of going carbon-neutral in its own operations by 2050 - Copyright AFP...

Life

Luton, Cambridge, and Coventry find themselves at the bottom of the list, experiencing an increase in the number of smokers.

Social Media

Elon Musk said his social media platform X will appeal against an Australian injunction forcing it to take down videos of a church stabbing.