Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Majarian Law Group Provides Key Insights on California Supreme Court Decision

The decision will help employees prove they suffered unjust retaliation in whistleblower lawsuits.

Whistleblower Retaliation - Majarian Law Group
Whistleblower Retaliation – Majarian Law Group

Whistleblower Retaliation – Majarian Law Group

LOS ANGELES – June 23, 2022 – (Newswire.com)

Majarian Law Group, a Los Angeles employment law firm that represents employees who have been wrongfully terminated, has shared insights on the California Supreme Court ruling regarding the burden of proof required by plaintiffs and defendants in whistleblower retaliation lawsuits. According to the firm, the ruling in Lawson v. PPG Architectural Finishes helps provide clarity on which standard to use for retaliation cases. 

The previous standard applied during section 1102.6 retaliation claims was the McDonnell-Douglas test. Prior to the ruling in Lawson, an employer was simply required to show that a legitimate, non-retaliatory reason existed for the adverse employment action, at which point the burden would shift to the employee to show that the employer’s stated reason was pretextual.  

With the ruling in Lawson, when litigating Labor Code section 1102.6 retaliation claims, employers in California are now required to prove by “clear and convincing evidence” that they would have retaliated against an employee “even had the plaintiff not engaged in protected activity”. 

In the lawsuit, the court considered the case of Wallen Lawson, who worked at PPG Architectural Finishes. Lawson was a territory manager for the company from 2015 to 2017. In 2017, he was put on a performance review plan for failing to meet his sales quotas. Around the same time, he alleged, his supervisor asked him to intentionally mishandle products that were not selling well so that his employer could avoid having to buy them back from retailers.

When Lawson refused to follow this order, he made two calls to the company’s ethics hotline. The second call resulted in an investigation, and soon after, Lawson received a poor performance review and was fired. He sued PPG Architectural Finishes, claiming his employer had retaliated against him for reporting the illegal order.

Employment attorney Garen Majarian applauded the court’s decision. “Companies must take measures to ensure they treat their employees fairly. That includes employees who insist that their employers live up to ethical principles,” said Majarian, who serves as a wrongful termination lawyer in Los Angeles. 

To learn more, please visit https://majarianlawgroup.com

About Majarian Law Group

Majarian Law Group, APC is a Los Angeles employment law firm that represents employees in individual and class action disputes against employers. 

Contact Information
Majarian Law Group, APC
(818) 646-5686
18250 Ventura Blvd
Tarzana, CA, 91356
USA

Press Release Service
by
Newswire.com

Original Source:

Majarian Law Group Provides Key Insights on California Supreme Court Decision

Written By

You may also like:

World

In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court ruled against the EPA, hindering the government from tackling the climate crisis.

World

You can’t just ring someone and ask them to fix America. Where would you get the parts, to start with?

World

A rainbow flag hangs outside the Ibn Rushd-Goethe mosque in Berlin - Copyright AFP GABRIEL BOUYSA mosque in Berlin on Friday became the first...