Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Life

US states show vast differences in medical emergency preparedness

US states need to plan for, and respond to, a wide range of incidents and emergencies that could affect health or patient care.

A radiologist interpreting magnetic resonance imaging. Image by The Medical Futurist editors. - The Future of Radiology and Artificial Intelligence. The Medical Futurist (2017-06-29) CC4.0
A radiologist interpreting magnetic resonance imaging. Image by The Medical Futurist editors. - The Future of Radiology and Artificial Intelligence. The Medical Futurist (2017-06-29) CC4.0

South Dakota leads the list of the U.S. states most prepared for medical emergencies, with the shortest ER waiting time and most hospitals for the state’s population. This is the subject of a new survey looking into preparedness for medical situations across the U.S.

A recent study by Masumi analysed all U.S. states across key healthcare metrics to identify the states that are most prepared for medical emergencies. In order to evaluate healthcare systems, the research compared states by hospital availability, medical workforce, and emergency response efficiency. The data from the American Hospital Directory KFF was used to calculate a final preparedness score, ranking states for emergency readiness.

The top ten ‘ready’ states were found to be:

  1. Idaho
  2. Washington
  3. Utah
  4. Arizona
  5. Nevada
  6. Maryland
  7. Colorado
  8. California
  9. Oregon
  10. Texas

In terms of deep diving the data, the U.S. state most prepared for medical emergencies is South Dakota, with a preparedness score of 100, reflecting a sufficient number of hospitals and available medical workforce. The state has the most nurses and most hospitals per 100K residents, with 2.5 hospitals available. South Dakota also has the shortest ER waiting time at 113 minutes on average.

Louisiana ranks second on the list of the states most prepared for medical emergencies, scoring 97.9. There are 299.4 available hospital beds per 100K residents in the state, more than in South Dakota, and the state leads in available doctors, with 302.5 specialists per 100K.

Mississippi holds third place, getting a preparedness score of 95.4. The state leads in available space for new patients, with 304.7 hospital beds per 100K people, the highest number in the ranking. The rate of available doctors and nurses is a little lower than in South Dakota and Louisiana.

West Virginia takes fourth place with a score of 89.5. There are 2 hospitals per 100K residents in the state and 328.6 doctors for the same population. West Virginia follows Mississippi closely when it comes to available hospital space, at 303.2 beds per 100K.

Ohio is fifth in the ranking of the U.S. states most prepared for medical emergencies, with a preparedness score of 87.5. The state has more available doctors than West Virginia or Mississippi, but overall, there are fewer hospitals for patients at 1.2 per 100K.

Overall, emergency readiness shows surprising winners and losers that challenge assumptions about healthcare quality. Small rural states often outperform wealthy coastal regions in getting patients treated quickly when minutes matter most.

Avatar photo
Written By

Dr. Tim Sandle is Digital Journal's Editor-at-Large for science news. Tim specializes in science, technology, environmental, business, and health journalism. He is additionally a practising microbiologist; and an author. He is also interested in history, politics and current affairs.

You may also like:

Tech & Science

Like Europe, Canada is looking to attract top US scientists who may want to evade Trump's crackdown on universities and research institutions. 

Business

Meta offered $100 million bonuses to OpenAI employees in an unsuccessful bid to poach the ChatGPT maker's talent and strengthen its teams.

Entertainment

JP Carlsen chatted about his "Talent Show" production at The Hudson Theatres in Los Angeles. The performances will run from June 20th to the...

Business

BioAlberta’s CEO reflects on regulatory hurdles, investor gaps, and the leadership needed to turn scientific breakthroughs into commercial success.