The sharp drop in prices for minerals critical to the green energy transition is masking a looming shortage due to inadequate investment, the International Energy Agency said Friday.
In its inaugural review of the market for such critical materials, the IEA noted prices for minerals key for electric vehicles, wind turbines and solar panels fell back to pre-pandemic levels as supplies caught up with and surpassed demand.
While the price drops are good news for consumers, the Paris-based agency which advises advanced economies on energy policy expressed concern it will deter investment needed to meet demand, which is set to soar as many nations try to phase out sales of new internal combustion engine cars in the next decade.
It calculated that announced projects will be able to meet only 70 percent of copper and 50 percent of lithium requirements in 2035, in a scenario in which countries worldwide meet their national climate goals.
Both metals are key for manufacturing electric vehicles.
“Secure and sustainable access to critical minerals is essential for smooth and affordable clean energy transitions,” IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol said in a statement.
“The world’s appetite for technologies such as solar panels, electric cars and batteries is growing fast –- but we cannot satisfy it without reliable and expanding supplies of critical minerals,” he added.
The IEA forecasts the combined market size of key energy transition minerals is set to more than double to $770 billion by 2040 as countries target net zero emissions by mid-century.
It found only limited progress has been made in diversifying supplies, a key issue given the recent experience with the pandemic snarling supply chains and geopolitical tensions creating risks to access.
The report analysed supply and geopolitical risks, as well as barriers to responding to supply disruptions, and exposure to environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks.
The IEA said it found a “mixed picture” regarding ESG risks.
While progress has been made in terms of involving local communities and using renewable energy, it flagged a different picture for reducing waste, emissions and water consumption.
But representatives of local communities warned the rush for critical minerals was already inflicting “serious costs” on indigenous people and their traditional lands, said Galina Angarova of the Buryat ethnic group from Siberia.
“If we continue down the current path, we risk building the destruction of nature, biodiversity, and human rights” into the economy-wide shift away fossil fuels, she told reporters.
“We are on the cusp of the next industrial revolution… and we have to do this right,” said Angarova, who leads a coalition fighting for indigenous rights in the green transition.
Adam Anthony, from financial transparency group Publish What You Pay, said companies were rushing to Africa to dig up critical minerals but there was little to show for that on the ground.
Tanzania, for example, was extracting manganese and graphite, but producing none of the higher-value green tech items like electric cars or batteries that need these minerals, he added.
“When we talk about critical minerals, it is also very important to ask — who are they critical for?” said Anthony.
“We don’t receive any value from the extraction at the moment.”
