Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Business

EU court advisor recommends new ruling in Apple tax case

The landmark case is one of the most fierce battles between the European Commission and big tech.

The EU claimed Apple parked untaxed revenue earned in Europe, Africa, the Middle East and India in Ireland
The EU claimed Apple parked untaxed revenue earned in Europe, Africa, the Middle East and India in Ireland - Copyright AFP/File SAEED KHAN
The EU claimed Apple parked untaxed revenue earned in Europe, Africa, the Middle East and India in Ireland - Copyright AFP/File SAEED KHAN

The European Court of Justice’s top legal advisor recommended on Thursday that an EU court make a new ruling in the long-running 13-billion-euro ($14-billion) tax case between Apple and Brussels.

The landmark case is one of the most fierce battles between the European Commission and big tech, dating back to 2016 when the EU’s executive arm accused Ireland of allowing Apple to escape 13 billion euros in taxes.

The EU claimed that, between 2003 and 2014, Apple parked untaxed revenue earned in Europe, Africa, the Middle East and India in Ireland, which is the European hub for big tech.

Brussels alleged that this amounted to illegal “state aid” by Ireland.

The opinion of Advocate General Giovanni Pitruzzella is not binding on the court, but it will be influential and taken as a sign of the direction the case is taking.

The bloc’s highest court heard the commission’s appeal earlier this year against a 2020 decision by the EU’s lower General Court to annul its order that Apple repay the money.

But according to Pitruzzella, the General Court “committed a series of errors in law”, and therefore he recommended setting aside the previous judgement.

“In the Advocate General’s opinion, it is therefore necessary for the General Court to carry out a new assessment,” the ECJ said in a statement.

A final decision by the ECJ is expected within a few months but the judges are not bound by Thursday’s opinion.

Apple has pushed back against the commission’s claims.

“The General Court’s ruling was very clear that Apple received no selective advantage and no state aid, and we believe that should be upheld,” Apple said in a statement.

During a hearing in May, the commission’s lawyer, Paul-John Loewenthal, told the ECJ there had been a “breach of procedure” and “numerous other legal errors” when the lower court heard the case.

Apple’s lawyer Daniel Beard pushed back against Loewenthal’s claims at the time. “Apple has paid the taxes that were due under the Irish tax code,” Beard said.

Apple has been present in Ireland since the 1980s.

The EU has faced difficulty justifying its tax decisions in recent years with previous court losses against Amazon and Starbucks.

AFP
Written By

With 2,400 staff representing 100 different nationalities, AFP covers the world as a leading global news agency. AFP provides fast, comprehensive and verified coverage of the issues affecting our daily lives.

You may also like:

Business

As Calgary builds its innovation infrastructure, local leaders share how coordinated effort and execution are turning vision into reality.

World

Tesla shareholders will determine on Thursday the fate of a massive pay package meant to retain Elon Musk.

World

World leaders meet Thursday in the Brazilian Amazon in an effort to show that climate change remains a top global priority.

Business

How are CIOs are approaching AI governance issues and an increasingly patchwork world of regulations?