Terri is a thought leader in Digital Journal’s Insight Forum (become a member).
“Concern for man and his fate must always form the chief interest of all technical endeavors… never forget it between your diagrams and equations.”
Imagine it’s 2030, and you’re beginning your day with a coffee, croissant, and a briefing from your autonomous AI agent that has monitored operations overnight, flagged anomalies, drafted strategic options, and even recommended which opportunity to pursue first.
This isn’t sci-fi. It will soon be your new morning routine, the frontier of leadership coming to a boardroom meeting near you, where smart, goal-oriented AI agents become co-pilots in leading organizations.
Tomorrow’s leaders won’t just lead people, they’ll lead AI
Agentic AI refers to systems that can reason, plan, and take action autonomously toward defined goals with minimal human supervision. Unlike generative models that respond to prompts, these agents orchestrate workflows, monitor progress, and make real-time decisions. McKinsey frames it as the shift from reactive AI to proactive virtual collaborators.
While today’s agents lack some lustre, soon this won’t be the case given the blistering speed of the AI Revolution we find ourselves in.
Gartner has named agentic AI a top strategic technology trend for 2025, anticipating that by 2028, 33% of enterprise software applications will embed agentic capabilities, and 15% of day-to-day decisions will be made autonomously by agents. Yet the path is rocky: Gartner also warns that, “more than 40% of agentic AI projects will be scrapped by 2027,” citing hype, poor ROI, and weak risk controls.
In this context, agentic leadership emerges. It reframes the leader not merely as manager of humans, but as orchestrator of hybrid human plus AI teams. It demands new skills: building trust, designing boundaries, ensuring accountability, and adopting a fresh mindset about what leadership means when part of your “team” is non-human.
Technology companies lead us to believe that this integration will be easy. But there’s more to this than a current skills gap. Case in point: Tilly Norwood. The recent uproar in Hollywood over the world’s first AI-generated actor, Tilly Norwood, shows how visceral the human reaction is when machines impersonate people. In this specific case, actors have condemned “her,” unions are publicly opposing synthetic replacement, and audiences were unsettled by the uncanny overlap, what’s commonly known as the uncanny valley.
It will be no different at the corporate office.
Agentic leadership goes beyond technical perfection. The natural pushback against replacement, assimilation, and impersonation are deeply human reactions that leaders must navigate. Leaders must navigate for themselves and others not only what agents do, but how they are received when they tread into domains of identity, meaning, and trust.
The principles of agentic leadership
Successful agentic leadership needs to rest on three core principles:
1. Shared agency with AI, not abdication
Leadership does not surrender control to AI. Instead, you design systems where agents act inside guardrails and escalate to humans when stakes are high. As Gartner puts it: “Design agentic AI for transparency and trust… limit autonomy to controlled environments and build in constraints, fail-safes and oversight.”
2. Trust through explainability and feedback loops
AI agents can’t be “black boxes.”
For leaders to trust AI agents, their actions must be understandable. Agents should produce clear “decision logs” and audit trails so leaders can trace how they reached a conclusion.
Equally important is the feedback loop: humans must regularly review and correct agent decisions, while agents must be designed to raise a hand when something is unclear or outside their safe zone. Trust is built by ensuring both sides can question and correct the other.
3. Data hygiene as leadership priority
Agents only reflect the data they are fed. Poor or biased data yields flawed decisions. In talent, as one analyst put it, “While data remains the cornerstone of AI performance, it’s also the biggest bottleneck for agentic AI.” McKinsey adds that companies must “reimagine workflows from the ground up… not just plug agents into existing systems.” Leaders must take responsibility for data ecosystems, not leave that to IT alone.
Beyond these, agentic leadership also involves cultural fluency: cultivating a mindset of empowerment (letting agents run within boundaries), resilience (accepting imperfect actions), and critical oversight (knowing when to intervene).
What agentic leadership looks like in practice
Let’s picture how this can play out.
Scenario: Retail operations
A global retail company implements an agentic AI system to manage inventory, pricing, and supplier orders. The AI agents continuously monitor supply chain signals, competitor pricing, and demand forecasts. They autonomously reorder stock, adjust prices regionally, and flag supply risks. The human leadership team now spends time approving major policy deviations, interpreting risk escalations, and designing strategy rather than micro-operational work.
Talent management
Some firms are already using agentic AI to spot emerging leaders, recommend internal mobility, and orchestrate cross-functional projects. Harvard Business Review has noted that agents can align actions with organizational goals and adapt over time.
Cybersecurity
Agentic AI can take proactive action, triaging alerts, deploying patches, and isolating threats, while escalating high-risk decisions to human analysts. The advantage: agents manage scale, speed, and complexity, while humans focus on context, ethics, nuance.
In each case, the leader must design where the agent acts, how much autonomy it has, and when to override. That demands clear decision domains, fallback paths, and escalation triggers.
Agentic leadership is redefining power and risk
Agentic leadership is powerful but it’s a double-edged sword. There are risks leaders must also master.
Agent washing: Many tools today marketed as “agentic” are repackaged chatbots or automation dressed up as agents. Gartner warns that only approximately 130 vendors truly offer agentic AI today, despite thousands claiming so.
Escalation and emergent behavior: Autonomous systems may take unexpected paths or cascade errors. Without strong guardrails and oversight, small mistakes can magnify.
Trust breakdown: If agents act opaquely, stakeholders will resist.
Ethics, bias and alignment: Agents must align with human values. Left unchecked, they may amplify bias or pursue unintended incentives.
Cost, complexity and technical debt: Building agentic systems demands orchestration, monitoring, integration, and governance layers. Gartner cautions many current projects lack maturity and risk controls. This isn’t a set it and forget it.
Thus the leader’s role includes risk architect: defining constraints, escalation paths, auditing systems, and fallback modes.
A roadmap to getting started
Here’s a practical way forward for leaders who want to pilot agentic leadership (while managing risk):
- Select a high-impact, bounded domain: Start where autonomy adds clear value, such as procurement, inventory, or customer triage.
- Define guardrails, escalation rules, and metrics: Spell out where agents act, when they defer, and how to measure outcomes.
- Ensure data integrity and integration: Audit for bias and gaps. Treat data governance as strategic.
- Run human and agent squads: Build “co-pilot cells” where agents and humans work side by side.
- Iterate and scale responsibly: Pilot, refine, and expand autonomy gradually.
- Build culture and capability: Train leaders in agentic thinking and transparent oversight.
- Govern and audit continuously: Regularly inspect for drift, bias, or unintended patterns.
As AWS executives describe it: “Start smart, learn fast, scale thoughtfully.”
Agentic leadership is the skill every CEO will need by 2030
Agentic leadership demands combining human judgment, ethics, and context with the speed, scalability, and autonomy of AI. It’s what Albert Einstein said prophetically so many years ago: human plus machine is a powerful combination.
The danger is not that agents displace humans, but that leaders treat them as Savior solutions or hope they’ll “just work.” Real value arises when humans and agents learn together, when leadership evolves to manage systems of agency, not just people.
Evolved leaders will have the competitive advantage
This is where the argument ties back to a philosophy I’ve written about before: AI should not be here to replace people. This is the choice we can all make.
For me, agentic leadership well framed and used reinforces that belief. The essence of leadership lies in empathy, ethics, trust-building, vision, and cannot be coded into an algorithm. Nor can ultimate decision-making be the agent role. Instead, AI agents should extend a leader’s reach, speed, and data fluency, while humans remain accountable for values, relationships, meaning, and action.
AI won’t replace leaders. But leaders and companies who fail to evolve, who refuse to learn how to co-lead with AI responsibly, may find themselves outpaced by those who do.
