Email
Password
Remember meForgot password?
    Log in with Twitter

article imageRemoving microplastics from tap water starts at treatment plants

By Karen Graham     Sep 7, 2017 in Technology
As we have learned, plastic pollution is not just a problem affecting our oceans. We are now ingesting tiny bits of plastic in our tap water. So this problem leaves but one question - Is there a solution?
There has been a multitude of studies on the impact of microplastics on the environment and in marine life. However, the use of microplastics in clothing and smaller plastic "nanoparticles" used in the cosmetics industry has helped to create a "chemical soup" of our once clean drinking water.
How do microplastics get into our fresh water sources? One of the main sources is our clothing. Minuscule fibers of acrylic, nylon, spandex, and polyester are shed each time we wash our clothes and are carried off to wastewater treatment plants.
According to a recent study cited by Water World, more than 700,000 microscopic plastic fibers could be released into the environment during each cycle of a washing machine.
Further Reading: Microplastics in drinking water — Huge problem needing a solution
A study in 2016 commissioned by clothing company Patagonia and conducted by researchers at the University of California, Santa Barbara, found that washing a single synthetic jacket released an average of 1.7 grams of microfibers.
Yoga pants and other comfortable clothing may contain microfibers that pollute our oeans.
Yoga pants and other comfortable clothing may contain microfibers that pollute our oeans.
Eli Christman/Wikimedia
A second study commissioned by the clothing company began in March this year and is being conducted by scientists at North Carolina State University with the goals of better understanding the characteristics of fibers and fabrics that lead to microfiber release. Scientists will also be looking at the development of a rapid test method to assess the potential of fabrics to shed during laundering.
Microbeads and the damage they pose to our health and the environment
Microbeads are even worse than microfibers. Microbeads are solid plastic particles of less than one millimeter in their largest dimension. The particle sizes range from 10 micrometers (0.00039 inches) on up to one millimeter (0.039 inches).
Further Reading: Microbeads to be dropped from cosmetics products
They are most often made of polyethylene but can be of other petrochemical plastics such as polypropylene and polystyrene.They are a major cause of environmental pollution in our oceans, freshwater and treated drinking water. Their use in cosmetics and other personal-care products such as toothpaste, soaps, and facial scrubs is already facing legislation by many governments seeking to ban their manufacture in products.
The World’s Largest Wastewater Recycling System for Indirect Potable Reuse
The World’s Largest Wastewater Recycling System for Indirect Potable Reuse
Jim Kutzle, Orange County Water District.
H.R. 1321, called the Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015 was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Barack Obama. This bill amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to ban rinse-off cosmetics that contain intentionally-added plastic microbeads beginning on January 1, 2018, and to ban the manufacturing of these cosmetics beginning on July 1, 2017. These bans are delayed by one year for cosmetics that are over-the-counter drugs.
Numerous countries around the world have either introduced legislation to ban the manufacture of cosmetics and personal care products containing microbeads, or have already passes laws, including Canada, Ireland, the UK, and the Netherlands.
Further Reading: Micro-plastics from body scrubs found polluting the Great Lakes
Solutions to removing microplastics in fresh water
You would think that a wastewater treatment plant would be able to remove microplastics from sewage and other effluents. And while many in the U.S. and UK do have a success rate of 98.41 percent, there is more to that figure than meets the eye. Despite this large reduction, a study published in May 2016 found that a wastewater treatment plant claiming the high success rate still was releasing 65 million microplastics into the receiving water every day.
Municipal effluent discharged from wastewater treatment works (WwTW) is suspected to be a significan...
Municipal effluent discharged from wastewater treatment works (WwTW) is suspected to be a significant contributor of microplastics (MP) to the environment.
Environmental Science and Technology
A significant proportion of the microplastic accumulated in and was removed during the grease removal stage, and it was only in this degreasing stage that any microfibers were found. The plant was handling so much effluent every day that despite the efficient removal rates achieved by this modern treatment plant, even a modest amount of microplastics being released per liter of effluent could result in significant amounts of microplastics entering the environment.
This means those elusive little pieces of plastic get discharged with "clean water" into rivers and streams with some of it entering our water treatment plants. This is where another problem arises. Many kinds of microplastics have hydrophobic surfaces that adhere to common pollutants like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
These chemicals would rather be ‘stuck’ to surfaces like plastic than in the water itself. If these compounds are highly concentrated on plastic, and then ingested by animals, (or humans) the chemicals can desorb - become unstuck - in the low oxygen environment inside the gut, leaving the animal or human at risk of exposure to toxic chemicals, says Timothy Hoellein, an associate professor of Biology at Loyola University Chicago.
Water and wastewater treatment plants will play a major role in microplastics removal
Dr. van Sebille, with the Imperial College in the UK, speaking during the fourth meeting of the Environmental Audit Committee in the House of Commons last year, argued that tackling microplastic pollution is about identifying intervention points, “where it is most efficient to intervene and where it is most efficient to do something about the release.”
The Dalecarlia Water Treatment Plant located at 5900 MacArthur Boulevard  NW in the Palisades neighb...
The Dalecarlia Water Treatment Plant located at 5900 MacArthur Boulevard, NW in the Palisades neighborhood of Washington, D.C. The facility is part of the Washington Aqueduct, a National Historic Landmark.
AgnosticPreachersKid
Dr. van Sebille also cited a study of water treatment plants in the Chicago, Illinois area, and suggested sand filters may be effective in capturing both fibers and microbeads. He pointed out that the study found a reduction in microplastics of 85 percent. However, Dr. van Sebille noted that "a sand filter might work very well, but the problem is once you go into that, at some point you have to backflush your sand filter, you have to push it back, and then what do you do with that sludge?"
This sludge from wastewater treatment plants forms a vital biosolid product that is recycled to agricultural land. However, increased concentrations of plastics in this product would not just return the plastics back to the environment through spreading but put at risk a valuable source of nutrients for the agricultural sector.
The bottom line is evident - Water treatment plants, those plants treating drinking water, have no agreed upon methodology for taking plastic pollution measurements or removing the plastic particles. Water UK reported, “the water industry has no current experience or technologies to separate out microplastics, and treatment of micro plastics by the water industry has never been explored.”
More about microplastics, environmenta damahe, Health risks, Solutions, Technology