http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/258513
Posted Aug 13, 2008 by Johnny Simpson

Left-Wing Rampages of the Day


image:8325:3::0

UPDATE: The KOS Diary entry 'If all right wing puntits had one neck, I'd hack it through" has mysteriously disappeared from the KOS site. However, you can get a taste of the love from the screen capture at Little Green Footballs, excerpt as follows:

'If god can give Robert Novak a brain tomour then why cant he give all of them one. I’m sure they annoy the f*ck out of him. I’ve heard that novak is called the prince of darkness. Hes just an vile slimey crumudgeon. Prince of Darkness? Too flattering by a long shot. But hes got his now and is out of the picture. Good riddence.'

You'll also find these lively poll questions at the same KOS post location. Curiously, it stands even as the article has been un-written in Orwellian fashion:

Poll
which right wing f*ckstick should get the next brain tomour?

Rush"lock the medicene cabniet when I visit" Limbaugh
12% 5 votes
Laura"bitter closeted carpet muncher" Ingrahm
4% 2 votes
Sean"fredo corleone" Hannity
9% 4 votes
Bill"I'll get fox news security to fuck you up" O'Rielley
7% 3 votes
Mike"I was drunk when I sucked Allen Gingsbergs cock so Im not queer"savage
4% 2 votes
Dennis"my moral compass is jammed up my ass" Prager
0% 0 votes
Mike"the thunderbolt missed me and hit my wife"Gallagher
0% 0 votes
Mark"how many conservative jews is too many on the radio"Levin
0% 0 votes
Mike"draft dodger chicken hawk" Medvid
2% 1 votes
Charles"Dr. Strangelove" Krathenhammer,
0% 0 votes
Mort"I am not a pussy"Kondrackie
0% 0 votes
Matt"Im not a fag"Drudge
0% 0 votes
Ann "cunty" Colter
4% 2 votes
Oh lord we beseech thee, smite them all
36% 15 votes
how can they have a brain toumour with no brains

Notice all the mindless hatred, murderous hostility, and spelling and grammatical errors typical of sociopaths, not to mention the Al Qaeda-like desire for mass beheadings. It would seem psychos don't get committed anymore. They just send 'em off to write for KOS.

Or they join Al Qaeda.

What's the difference, really? Tell me how this KOS diary entry is in essence significantly different from a threatening Islamist web posting. The only difference I can see is that Al Qaeda wants ALL Americans dead. KOS only wants about half of us wiped out.

But they both want it to go down in the worst possible ways.

I say again: what's the difference?

As a reminder, KOS is one of the most visited blogs on the web. And this was a front-page diary post, not from the comments section. To their credit, many of the more sane (or less insane) commenters at this post are giving 'rabidroach' hell. Here's a few samples:

'I just lost a family member to cancer, and I'm faced with losing another soon. Cancer's not funny. Pr*ck.'

'I am a cancer survivor; and this bizarre little screed is so far into bad taste it is beyond sick. Grow up, and try to develop an intelligent argument instead of spewing hateful crap like this.'

Then you have the cheerleaders, like this one:

'SSSSSHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!! Be quiet rabidroach. We can't talk like this until AFTER the election! Once we get Obama in, email me.'

Okayyyy.

KOS and many other leftie sites also wished for Tony Snow's cancer to kill him. They got their wish. But it doesn't seem like they're happy now. They're always so many more Brownshirt Neocons that need to die horrible deaths.

Or, as Captain Redlegs Terrell said in Outlaw Josey Wales, "doin' good ain't got no end."

UPDATE: The KOS diary post is back up. Check it out for yourself before it disappears again.

Then again, considering that all Republicans are fascist neocon KKK types who don't have anywhere near the love for their fellow human beings that KOS has, they got a point.

Two recent DJ posts also caught my eye. In Sue D's post 'Jon Voight, Father of Angelina Jolie, Blasts Barack Obama as a Socialist' (though I consider that more fact than blast), this passage literally jumped out at me:

'(Voight's) criticisms against Obama has ignited a firestorm among liberal blogs, that The Politico describes as going "ballistic", to which many rarely see when celebrities come out on behalf of Obama.

'Jeffrey Wells, who runs the movie and pop culture website Hollywood-Elsewhere.com, suggested what many are interpreting as "blacklisting" Voight because of his criticisms about Obama in the opinion editorial.

'Wells writes "[Voight is] obviously entitled to say and write whatever he wants. But it's only natural that industry-based Obama supporters will henceforth regard him askance. Honestly? If I were a producer and I had to make a casting decision about hiring Voight or some older actor who hadn't pissed me off with an idiotic Washington Times op-ed piece, I might very well say to myself, ‘Voight? Let him eat cake."

So in other words, liberals in Hollywood are within their rights to keep Voight off movie sets and out of work because of his politics. Didn't this kind of stuff happen in Hollywood before, under a guy named McCarthy? Any comments of outrage from George Clooney?

Notice also that when right-leaning people rant, it's 'going ballistic' but when lefties do it, it's just 'keeping it real.'

Ya, real hateful. This crap is all over leftie sites on the web. I dare you to find any number of right-leaning blogs that spew out the same visceral level and quantity of vitriol you see coming out of sites like KOS and HuffPo on a daily (and sometimes hourly) basis. .

In yet another DJ post by the wonderfully prolific Sue D, 'Colorado Democratic Party Threatens Clinton Delegate For Being Critical Of Obama' it would seem Democrat leaders are taking the Tony Soprano approach toward their delegates, having stripped a Wisconsin delegate of her status and threatening a Colorado delegate with the same.

Why? Because they aren't worshipping properly at the Altar of Obama. More likely, they're scared crapless at the possibility of a rambunctious convention full of disgruntled delegates.

Personally, I thought rambunctious, freewheeling conventions were what American politics and democracy were all about. I guess their ideas of those are different from mine. More in line with Josef Stalin's, as seems to be the case today.

Oh, and for a bonus, ABC's Jake Tapper had a great innuendo-filled blog post implying rampant racism in John McCain's campaign. Michelle Malkin dissects him like a frog on that here. Like there has never been any racism in Obama's campaign?

I don't understand all this. How can so many in the self-professed party of freedom, liberty, love, multiculturalism and most of all tolerance be so consumed with murderous hatred, mindless bigotry and just plain political cowardice?

I'll at least give Republicans and Neocons this much credit: when they war, they direct their guns and hostility at well-deserving foreign enemies like bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, Mahmoud Amedinejad and their Nazi-like legions, not at their own country and fellow free citizens.

Not feeling the love.

I guess KOS can only be tolerant of right-wingers when they all have brain tumors.

Though I wouldn't bet on it. Those KOS types are never happy. If all the Republicans were dead, they'd turn on the Clintonistas next, and ultimately themselves. Remember, Leon Trotsky was a Father of the Revolution, and he got it in the head with an ax by two of Stalin's agents in Mexico in 1940.

See, Trotsky didn't agree politically with what Stalin was doing and got on his bad side. Not a good place to be.

Same for KOS and the far left-wing DNC today, it would seem.