Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

World

Thai junta defends ‘cheap’ $393 mn Chinese sub purchase

-

The Thai junta on Tuesday defended $393 million earmarked for a Chinese submarine, batting back criticism of the secrecy of the deal, its cost and the questionable utility of the warship.

The submarine sale is the latest defence deal between Beijing and Bangkok, who have grown ever closer since Thailand's 2014 coup.

Historically the Southeast Asian kingdom has been a major purchaser of western arms, especially from its traditional Cold War ally the United States.

But since the coup, which strained ties with the West, there has been a run of windfalls for China with Thailand scooping up several dozen Beijing-built tanks and inking plans to buy three submarines in total -- a purchase that will amount to $1 billion.

Talks are also underway for China to construct a multi-million dollar armaments and military hardware repair facility in Thailand.

The military-led cabinet approved the funds for the first submarine purchase last week -- a decision that was not made public until Monday, triggering concern about a lack of transparency.

The proposed sale has long fuelled controversy with critics saying submarines are of little strategic value in a country with shallow surrounding waters and no stake in the South China Sea disputes that have embroiled its neighbours.

The huge cost of the vessel has also raised eyebrows in Thailand, where ordinary people are feeling the pinch from years of lacklustre growth.

- 'Toys for the boys' -

On Tuesday the junta deputy leader General Prawit Wongsuwon insisted the deal was "transparent" and a good bargain for the Thai navy.

"The reason we choose Chinese-built submarines is because they are the cheapest when compared to other countries' offers," he told reporters.

The submarines are needed to "protect our natural resources in the Andaman Sea," he added, stressing that neighbouring countries "all have submarines."

Prawit said the first submarine will be delivered within the next six years, with two more expected over the next decade.

Others are less convinced by the deal. A retired admiral recently told AFP that money for the submarines would be better spent on desperately needed navy patrol vessels and helicopters.

"No real navy man would push for these submarines," he said.

Defence spending has tripled in Thailand over the last decade, a period where the military has seized power twice.

"As the military has the final say on budgeting, there should be no surprise that we should see the junta seeking more 'toys for the boys'," said Paul Chambers, a expert on the Thai military.

"This is a contributing factor to Thailand's current economic morass," he told AFP, adding that the junta tried to keep the deal quiet because of its unpopularity.

The army, navy and air force tussle over the spoils of budget hikes, reflecting the balance of power among the military.

Thailand's military famously purchased a small Spanish aircraft carrier in the 1990s that now languishes in a port and has no aircraft.

The Thai junta on Tuesday defended $393 million earmarked for a Chinese submarine, batting back criticism of the secrecy of the deal, its cost and the questionable utility of the warship.

The submarine sale is the latest defence deal between Beijing and Bangkok, who have grown ever closer since Thailand’s 2014 coup.

Historically the Southeast Asian kingdom has been a major purchaser of western arms, especially from its traditional Cold War ally the United States.

But since the coup, which strained ties with the West, there has been a run of windfalls for China with Thailand scooping up several dozen Beijing-built tanks and inking plans to buy three submarines in total — a purchase that will amount to $1 billion.

Talks are also underway for China to construct a multi-million dollar armaments and military hardware repair facility in Thailand.

The military-led cabinet approved the funds for the first submarine purchase last week — a decision that was not made public until Monday, triggering concern about a lack of transparency.

The proposed sale has long fuelled controversy with critics saying submarines are of little strategic value in a country with shallow surrounding waters and no stake in the South China Sea disputes that have embroiled its neighbours.

The huge cost of the vessel has also raised eyebrows in Thailand, where ordinary people are feeling the pinch from years of lacklustre growth.

– ‘Toys for the boys’ –

On Tuesday the junta deputy leader General Prawit Wongsuwon insisted the deal was “transparent” and a good bargain for the Thai navy.

“The reason we choose Chinese-built submarines is because they are the cheapest when compared to other countries’ offers,” he told reporters.

The submarines are needed to “protect our natural resources in the Andaman Sea,” he added, stressing that neighbouring countries “all have submarines.”

Prawit said the first submarine will be delivered within the next six years, with two more expected over the next decade.

Others are less convinced by the deal. A retired admiral recently told AFP that money for the submarines would be better spent on desperately needed navy patrol vessels and helicopters.

“No real navy man would push for these submarines,” he said.

Defence spending has tripled in Thailand over the last decade, a period where the military has seized power twice.

“As the military has the final say on budgeting, there should be no surprise that we should see the junta seeking more ‘toys for the boys’,” said Paul Chambers, a expert on the Thai military.

“This is a contributing factor to Thailand’s current economic morass,” he told AFP, adding that the junta tried to keep the deal quiet because of its unpopularity.

The army, navy and air force tussle over the spoils of budget hikes, reflecting the balance of power among the military.

Thailand’s military famously purchased a small Spanish aircraft carrier in the 1990s that now languishes in a port and has no aircraft.

AFP
Written By

With 2,400 staff representing 100 different nationalities, AFP covers the world as a leading global news agency. AFP provides fast, comprehensive and verified coverage of the issues affecting our daily lives.

You may also like:

World

Calling for urgent action is the international medical humanitarian organization Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF)

World

Immigration is a symptom of a much deeper worldwide problem.

Business

Saudi Aramco President & CEO Amin Nasser speaks during the CERAWeek oil summit in Houston, Texas - Copyright AFP Mark FelixPointing to the still...

Business

A recent article in the Wall Street Journal infers that some workers might be falling out of the job market altogether.