Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

World

Swedish prosecutors oppose lifting of Assange arrest warrant

-

Swedish prosecutors said Thursday they were opposed to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange's defense lawyers' request to lift a European arrest warrant against him over a 2010 rape allegation.

Assange's lawyers requested his release after the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention issued a non-binding legal opinion on February 5 saying his confinement in the Ecuadorian embassy amounted to arbitrary detention by Sweden and Britain.

Both Britain and Sweden have angrily disputed the group's findings.

"There is, at the moment, no reason to annul the detention order," the prosecution authority said in its statement.

The 44-year-old Australian sought refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy in London in June 2012 after exhausting all his legal options in Britain against extradition to Sweden.

"Julian Assange is still ... suspected of a serious crime," Swedish prosecutors said.

A Stockholm district court was expected to decide whether to lift the arrest warrant within the next two or three weeks.

Previous requests to have the warrant dropped were denied by the Stockholm district, appeals and supreme court.

Swedish prosecutors issued the arrest warrant because they want to question Assange about the rape allegation, which he denies.

The alleged crime dates back to 2010 and the statute of limitations expires in 2020.

Assange fears that if he were sent to Sweden to face trial, he could be extradited to the United States to be tried over the publication of hundreds of thousands of classified documents.

Founded by Assange in 2006, WikiLeaks has infuriated the United States by releasing some 500,000 secret military files on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and 250,000 diplomatic cables.

Swedish prosecutors said Thursday they were opposed to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange’s defense lawyers’ request to lift a European arrest warrant against him over a 2010 rape allegation.

Assange’s lawyers requested his release after the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention issued a non-binding legal opinion on February 5 saying his confinement in the Ecuadorian embassy amounted to arbitrary detention by Sweden and Britain.

Both Britain and Sweden have angrily disputed the group’s findings.

“There is, at the moment, no reason to annul the detention order,” the prosecution authority said in its statement.

The 44-year-old Australian sought refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy in London in June 2012 after exhausting all his legal options in Britain against extradition to Sweden.

“Julian Assange is still … suspected of a serious crime,” Swedish prosecutors said.

A Stockholm district court was expected to decide whether to lift the arrest warrant within the next two or three weeks.

Previous requests to have the warrant dropped were denied by the Stockholm district, appeals and supreme court.

Swedish prosecutors issued the arrest warrant because they want to question Assange about the rape allegation, which he denies.

The alleged crime dates back to 2010 and the statute of limitations expires in 2020.

Assange fears that if he were sent to Sweden to face trial, he could be extradited to the United States to be tried over the publication of hundreds of thousands of classified documents.

Founded by Assange in 2006, WikiLeaks has infuriated the United States by releasing some 500,000 secret military files on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and 250,000 diplomatic cables.

AFP
Written By

With 2,400 staff representing 100 different nationalities, AFP covers the world as a leading global news agency. AFP provides fast, comprehensive and verified coverage of the issues affecting our daily lives.

You may also like:

World

Let’s just hope sanity finally gets a word in edgewise.

Business

Two sons of the world's richest man Bernard Arnault on Thursday joined the board of LVMH after a shareholder vote.

Entertainment

Taylor Swift is primed to release her highly anticipated record "The Tortured Poets Department" on Friday.

Tech & Science

The role of AI regulation should be to facilitate innovation.