Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

World

Secrets among friends: leaks jolt US-British security ties

-

Within minutes of British counter-terror police learning a deadly blast had struck Manchester Arena, their US counterparts were in the loop. That is how the security relationship -- one of the world's closest -- is supposed to work. What is not supposed to happen, is for the information to leak.

The intimate intelligence cooperation between the two allies has paid off in multiple cases since the 9/11 attacks exposed the Western world to the threat of jihadist groups.

So when a bomber targeted Monday's pop concert in northern England, killing 22 people, British authorities immediately shared what they knew with London-based officials from the FBI and CIA.

The details quickly flowed through top secret transatlantic pipelines to counter-terrorism units in Washington, who tapped their networks and databases to see what they could to add to the fast-moving investigation by British police.

So far, so normal.

"It's obviously the closest intelligence relationship in the world. And when something like this happens, the faucets open," said a European diplomat in Washington.

But when American officials appeared to have leaked crucial early details to the media -- the fact it was a suicide attack; the attacker's name, Salman Abedi; police pictures of the bomb components -- their counterparts were outraged.

The explosive device used in the Manchester bombing appears to have been made with
The explosive device used in the Manchester bombing appears to have been made with "forethought and care"
Handout, THE NEW YORK TIMES/AFP

London called it a breach of trust, and briefly suspended intelligence sharing, as Prime Minister Theresa May made clear to President Donald Trump during a NATO summit that shared intelligence must be "secure."

Trump moved fast to contain the row -- vowing to investigate the leaks and prosecute if need be -- while his top diplomat headed to London to show solidarity with America's closest ally.

"We take full responsibility," Secretary of State Rex Tillerson told reporters Friday when grilled over the leaks: "This special relationship that exists between our two countries will certainly withstand this particular unfortunate event."

The British reprimand was all the more embarrassing coming weeks after Trump was reported to have shared classified intelligence -- allegedly from Israel -- about an Islamic State bomb plot with the visiting Russian foreign minister.

- Hundreds of eyes -

Britain's Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson and US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson write message...
Britain's Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson and US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson write messages of condolence to victims of the May 22 attack at Manchester Arena
Adrian DENNIS, POOL/AFP

Britain's National Police Chiefs Council had warned the leaks could erode trust, slamming the "unauthorized disclosure of potential evidence in the middle of a major counter terrorism investigation."

By late Thursday, the relationship appeared back on track.

"Having received fresh assurances, we are now working closely with our key partners around the world including all those in the 'Five Eyes' intelligence alliance," said Mark Rowley, Britain's lead officer for counter-terrorism policing.

Thomas Sanderson, senior fellow at the Center for Strategic & International Studies, expects the overall damage to the bilateral relationship to be "limited and perishable... until it happens again."

Britain and Israel, Washington's key intelligence partners, always have to weigh the benefits and liabilities of sharing information, he said. "Now they have to do that calculation a little bit more carefully, given that they feel the United States has become incredibly leaky."

Who disclosed details of the Manchester probe remains an open question.

Given the expansion of intelligence resources and intensified cooperation on terrorism over the past 15 years, hundreds of people across the US government's massive intelligence bureaucracy would have been privy to the information.

Within hours, it would have been shared with White House and National Security Council officials; senior members of Congress; military intelligence; the Homeland Security Department; FBI offices, and other agencies that might help the investigation.

The details collected by British police would also have immediately sped to counter-terror officials in the three other countries that make up the "Five Eyes" alliance -- Australia, Canada and New Zealand -- and to counterparts in Germany, France, and elsewhere in Europe.

- The challenge of openness -

People gather at a memorial for the victims of the Manchester bombing  in Manchester's St Ann S...
People gather at a memorial for the victims of the Manchester bombing, in Manchester's St Ann Square, on May 25, 2017
Oli SCARFF, AFP/File

Back in 2001, the September 11 attacks exposed a practice known as "stovepiping" -- when different agencies fail to share crucial intelligence, with sometimes lethal consequences.

Since then bureaucratic walls in Washington have been broken down, said Jeffrey Ringel, an FBI agent for 21 years and now director at the Soufan Group, a security and intelligence consultancy.

The flip side is that with so many more people accessing the information, the chance of it leaking is that much greater.

Ringel believes such leaks "hurt cooperation between partners," and have no real justification.

"Nobody in the general public needs to know the name of the attacker, nobody in the general public needs to see the bomb-making components."

The London-Washington rift comes at a tricky time for intelligence sharing.

Britain's decision to withdraw from the European Union could complicate its security cooperation with those countries. Some European officials are pushing to create a transatlantic intelligence center to centralize sharing -- but with little progress to date.

So a cutback on US-British counter-terror cooperation would flirt with disaster, analysts say, given the continuing threats from the Islamic State group and Al-Qaeda.

Ringel's concern is that leaks -- if the problem persists -- could drive a return to the bad old days of each country sitting tight on its little piece of the picture.

"That not only would hurt the investigation, possible follow-on investigations, but could also put people's lives in danger," said Ringel.

Within minutes of British counter-terror police learning a deadly blast had struck Manchester Arena, their US counterparts were in the loop. That is how the security relationship — one of the world’s closest — is supposed to work. What is not supposed to happen, is for the information to leak.

The intimate intelligence cooperation between the two allies has paid off in multiple cases since the 9/11 attacks exposed the Western world to the threat of jihadist groups.

So when a bomber targeted Monday’s pop concert in northern England, killing 22 people, British authorities immediately shared what they knew with London-based officials from the FBI and CIA.

The details quickly flowed through top secret transatlantic pipelines to counter-terrorism units in Washington, who tapped their networks and databases to see what they could to add to the fast-moving investigation by British police.

So far, so normal.

“It’s obviously the closest intelligence relationship in the world. And when something like this happens, the faucets open,” said a European diplomat in Washington.

But when American officials appeared to have leaked crucial early details to the media — the fact it was a suicide attack; the attacker’s name, Salman Abedi; police pictures of the bomb components — their counterparts were outraged.

The explosive device used in the Manchester bombing appears to have been made with

The explosive device used in the Manchester bombing appears to have been made with “forethought and care”
Handout, THE NEW YORK TIMES/AFP

London called it a breach of trust, and briefly suspended intelligence sharing, as Prime Minister Theresa May made clear to President Donald Trump during a NATO summit that shared intelligence must be “secure.”

Trump moved fast to contain the row — vowing to investigate the leaks and prosecute if need be — while his top diplomat headed to London to show solidarity with America’s closest ally.

“We take full responsibility,” Secretary of State Rex Tillerson told reporters Friday when grilled over the leaks: “This special relationship that exists between our two countries will certainly withstand this particular unfortunate event.”

The British reprimand was all the more embarrassing coming weeks after Trump was reported to have shared classified intelligence — allegedly from Israel — about an Islamic State bomb plot with the visiting Russian foreign minister.

– Hundreds of eyes –

Britain's Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson and US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson write message...

Britain's Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson and US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson write messages of condolence to victims of the May 22 attack at Manchester Arena
Adrian DENNIS, POOL/AFP

Britain’s National Police Chiefs Council had warned the leaks could erode trust, slamming the “unauthorized disclosure of potential evidence in the middle of a major counter terrorism investigation.”

By late Thursday, the relationship appeared back on track.

“Having received fresh assurances, we are now working closely with our key partners around the world including all those in the ‘Five Eyes’ intelligence alliance,” said Mark Rowley, Britain’s lead officer for counter-terrorism policing.

Thomas Sanderson, senior fellow at the Center for Strategic & International Studies, expects the overall damage to the bilateral relationship to be “limited and perishable… until it happens again.”

Britain and Israel, Washington’s key intelligence partners, always have to weigh the benefits and liabilities of sharing information, he said. “Now they have to do that calculation a little bit more carefully, given that they feel the United States has become incredibly leaky.”

Who disclosed details of the Manchester probe remains an open question.

Given the expansion of intelligence resources and intensified cooperation on terrorism over the past 15 years, hundreds of people across the US government’s massive intelligence bureaucracy would have been privy to the information.

Within hours, it would have been shared with White House and National Security Council officials; senior members of Congress; military intelligence; the Homeland Security Department; FBI offices, and other agencies that might help the investigation.

The details collected by British police would also have immediately sped to counter-terror officials in the three other countries that make up the “Five Eyes” alliance — Australia, Canada and New Zealand — and to counterparts in Germany, France, and elsewhere in Europe.

– The challenge of openness –

People gather at a memorial for the victims of the Manchester bombing  in Manchester's St Ann S...

People gather at a memorial for the victims of the Manchester bombing, in Manchester's St Ann Square, on May 25, 2017
Oli SCARFF, AFP/File

Back in 2001, the September 11 attacks exposed a practice known as “stovepiping” — when different agencies fail to share crucial intelligence, with sometimes lethal consequences.

Since then bureaucratic walls in Washington have been broken down, said Jeffrey Ringel, an FBI agent for 21 years and now director at the Soufan Group, a security and intelligence consultancy.

The flip side is that with so many more people accessing the information, the chance of it leaking is that much greater.

Ringel believes such leaks “hurt cooperation between partners,” and have no real justification.

“Nobody in the general public needs to know the name of the attacker, nobody in the general public needs to see the bomb-making components.”

The London-Washington rift comes at a tricky time for intelligence sharing.

Britain’s decision to withdraw from the European Union could complicate its security cooperation with those countries. Some European officials are pushing to create a transatlantic intelligence center to centralize sharing — but with little progress to date.

So a cutback on US-British counter-terror cooperation would flirt with disaster, analysts say, given the continuing threats from the Islamic State group and Al-Qaeda.

Ringel’s concern is that leaks — if the problem persists — could drive a return to the bad old days of each country sitting tight on its little piece of the picture.

“That not only would hurt the investigation, possible follow-on investigations, but could also put people’s lives in danger,” said Ringel.

AFP
Written By

With 2,400 staff representing 100 different nationalities, AFP covers the world as a leading global news agency. AFP provides fast, comprehensive and verified coverage of the issues affecting our daily lives.

You may also like:

World

Let’s just hope sanity finally gets a word in edgewise.

Tech & Science

The role of AI regulation should be to facilitate innovation.

Sports

In the shadow of the 330-metre (1,082-foot) monument, workers are building the temporary stadium that will host the beach volleyball.

World

An Iranian military truck carries a Sayad 4-B missile past a portrait of supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei during a military parade on April...