Citizens in ex-Soviet Kyrgyzstan went to the polls on Sunday to vote on a raft of amendments to the constitution promoted by the country's leader, several of which have been slammed by rights groups.
The Central Election Commission said that polls had opened across the Central Asian country at 0200 GMT for a vote analysts say is likely to see the changes passed.
Kyrgyzstan, a mountainous majority-Muslim republic of six million, is the most democratic of the so-called "stans" but also the most politically volatile.
In just 25 years of independence the country has experienced two revolutions unseating presidents in 2005 and 2010 and ethnic violence.
This is the seventh time the country is putting constitutional changes to a vote.
"Past changes to the basic law have shown that our politicians and their lawyers do not know how to make reforms," Zainidin Kurmanov, a political analyst and former parliamentary speaker told AFP.
"There is no certainty that anything worthwhile will emerge from these amendments," he said.
In October, two parties exited the coalition government headed by Kyrgyz President Almazbek Atambayev's Social Democratic Party of Kyrgyzstan in opposition to the proposed changes.
If passed, the country's prime minister will gain new powers over budget-related legislation and will not need parliamentary or presidential approval to appoint and dismiss ministers.
Atambayev has repeatedly denied accusations he will drop down into the strengthened premier's role when his single six-year term ends next year.
A by-law created when the constitution was last amended in 2010 said the existing constitution should remain until 2020 but parliament and the judiciary endorsed the vote.
Other amendments that appear to threaten individual rights have drawn criticism at home and abroad.
One highlighted by the Council of Europe's Venice Commission defines marriage as "between a man and a woman" rather than "two persons" as previously.
Kyrgyzstan has come under fire from the West since 2014 for considering an LGBT propaganda bill echoing one passed in key ally Russia, but the law has not progressed beyond the draft stage.
Another amendment rights groups have railed against removes the government's obligation to consider the opinions of international rights bodies regarding citizens' complaints of rights violations.
Critics have argued the government has not explained the changes to the public, but backing from pro-government media and the absence of an effective 'no' campaign means they are likely to pass.
Bolot Osmonov, 58, who works as an engineer in the capital Bishkek said he would vote in favour of the amendments Sunday.
"I support the amendments and I support Atambayev. In five years he has shown he doesn't steal. His family aren't in government positions. These changes will bring more stability," Osmonov told AFP.
A 47-year-old taxi driver Zhomart Bolotbekov told AFP he would not be voting, however. "It seems elections is all we do, but they don't change anything. Why should I go?"
Kyrgyzstan is one of the two poorest countries to emerge from the former Soviet Union with a strong dependence on cash transfers sent home by hundreds of thousands of Kyrgyz working in Russia.
Citizens in ex-Soviet Kyrgyzstan went to the polls on Sunday to vote on a raft of amendments to the constitution promoted by the country’s leader, several of which have been slammed by rights groups.
The Central Election Commission said that polls had opened across the Central Asian country at 0200 GMT for a vote analysts say is likely to see the changes passed.
Kyrgyzstan, a mountainous majority-Muslim republic of six million, is the most democratic of the so-called “stans” but also the most politically volatile.
In just 25 years of independence the country has experienced two revolutions unseating presidents in 2005 and 2010 and ethnic violence.
This is the seventh time the country is putting constitutional changes to a vote.
“Past changes to the basic law have shown that our politicians and their lawyers do not know how to make reforms,” Zainidin Kurmanov, a political analyst and former parliamentary speaker told AFP.
“There is no certainty that anything worthwhile will emerge from these amendments,” he said.
In October, two parties exited the coalition government headed by Kyrgyz President Almazbek Atambayev’s Social Democratic Party of Kyrgyzstan in opposition to the proposed changes.
If passed, the country’s prime minister will gain new powers over budget-related legislation and will not need parliamentary or presidential approval to appoint and dismiss ministers.
Atambayev has repeatedly denied accusations he will drop down into the strengthened premier’s role when his single six-year term ends next year.
A by-law created when the constitution was last amended in 2010 said the existing constitution should remain until 2020 but parliament and the judiciary endorsed the vote.
Other amendments that appear to threaten individual rights have drawn criticism at home and abroad.
One highlighted by the Council of Europe’s Venice Commission defines marriage as “between a man and a woman” rather than “two persons” as previously.
Kyrgyzstan has come under fire from the West since 2014 for considering an LGBT propaganda bill echoing one passed in key ally Russia, but the law has not progressed beyond the draft stage.
Another amendment rights groups have railed against removes the government’s obligation to consider the opinions of international rights bodies regarding citizens’ complaints of rights violations.
Critics have argued the government has not explained the changes to the public, but backing from pro-government media and the absence of an effective ‘no’ campaign means they are likely to pass.
Bolot Osmonov, 58, who works as an engineer in the capital Bishkek said he would vote in favour of the amendments Sunday.
“I support the amendments and I support Atambayev. In five years he has shown he doesn’t steal. His family aren’t in government positions. These changes will bring more stability,” Osmonov told AFP.
A 47-year-old taxi driver Zhomart Bolotbekov told AFP he would not be voting, however. “It seems elections is all we do, but they don’t change anything. Why should I go?”
Kyrgyzstan is one of the two poorest countries to emerge from the former Soviet Union with a strong dependence on cash transfers sent home by hundreds of thousands of Kyrgyz working in Russia.
