Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

World

Japan parliament passes controversial security bills

-

Japan's parliament passed contentious security bills into law early Saturday, in a move that could see Japanese troops fight abroad for the first time in 70 years.

Lawmakers approved the bills to ease restrictions on the country's tightly controlled military, while outside thousands rallied in a last-ditch show of opposition to laws they fear could fundamentally reshape the proudly pacifist nation.

The changes, which would allow Japanese troops to fight in defence of allies, have drawn tens of thousands of people from across society onto the streets in almost daily protests, in a show of public anger rarely seen on such a scale.

Outside parliament protesters, estimated at over 10,000, raised their voices louder as news of the decision spread through the crowd, chanting: "Protect the constitution." One sign read: "Spread peace not war."

"I'm ready to stay here all night. The government cannot ignore such a demonstration," said 60-year-old farmer Yukiko Ogawa.

"It is vital that we make our opinion known, that we are here."

Officers of the House of Councillors count ballots on the security bill at the parliament on early S...
Officers of the House of Councillors count ballots on the security bill at the parliament on early September 19, 2015 in Tokyo, Japan
Toshifumi Kitamura, AFP

Seiji Kawabe, 49, vowed the movement would live on, adding: "We have enough natural disasters, typhoons, earthquakes... we don't need any man-made disasters."

Organisers said more than 40,000 had gathered for Friday night's rally, while police estimated the size of the crowd at some 11,000.

Nationalist Prime Minister Shinzo Abe says the changes were a normalisation of Japan's military policy, which has been restricted to self-defence and aid missions by a pacifist constitution imposed by the US after World War II.

He and his backers say the laws are necessary because of threats from an increasingly belligerent China and unstable North Korea.

Opponents argue they go against both the constitution and the national psyche, and could see Japan dragged into far-flung American wars.

Speaking after the vote, Abe said the changes were "necessary in order to protect people's lives and peaceful way of life".

"This is designed to prevent wars," he told journalists.

- 'We do not forgive' -

The decision came after days of emotional debate and delaying tactics by the opposition, which in Thursday erupted into scuffles as politicians physically tried to block a committee approving the bills.

Protesters stage a rally against Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's controversial security bi...
Protesters stage a rally against Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's controversial security bills during a demonstration outside the National Diet in Tokyo, on September 18, 2015
Kazuhiro Nogi, AFP

President of the upper house Masaaki Yamazaki said the bills passed with 148 lawmakers voting in favour, compared to 90 against.

However, the changes will not see Japanese troops dispatched to warzones any time soon and the laws will now face a ruling by the supreme court that could potentially see them overturned.

Unable to muster support to amend clauses enshrining pacifism, Abe opted instead to re-interpret the document for the purpose of his bills, ignoring warnings from scholars and lawyers that they are unconstitutional.

He has faced fierce criticism for both the laws themselves and the way he has driven them through in the face of public opposition.

There are growing signs this is taking a political toll -- opinion polls show the vast majority of Japanese are against the changes, and Abe's once sky-high approval rating is dropping.

In protests outside parliament earlier in the day, Yoko Fujiwara stood among the crowds with her six-year-old daughter, who carried a hand-written sign saying: "We do not forgive. Children are angry, too."

"I came to the protest together with my daughter to show what real democracy is like," said the 40-year-old graduate law student.

Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe bows after a lower house no-confidence resolution was rejecte...
Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe bows after a lower house no-confidence resolution was rejected, as the government attempts to pass the security bill at the parliament in Tokyo on September 18, 2015
Toshifumi Kitamura, AFP

Opponents of the laws, including a Nobel-Prize winner, popular musicians and other prominent figures, say the changes could fundamentally alter Japan.

Washington has backed the changes, but regional rivals China and South Korea have expressed concern at any expansion of Japanese military scope.

China's foreign ministry spokesman Hong Lei on Friday called on Japan to "listen carefully to voices inside and outside the country calling for justice" and called on lawmakers to "take real actions to protect regional peace and stability".

Security experts say the laws will force a re-evaluation of Japan's place on the world stage.

"The bills are a psychological message to the world that an era in which Japan should not be involved in conflicts because of its exclusively defence-oriented policy is over," said Hideshi Takesada, a professor at Takushoku University in Tokyo.

Japan’s parliament passed contentious security bills into law early Saturday, in a move that could see Japanese troops fight abroad for the first time in 70 years.

Lawmakers approved the bills to ease restrictions on the country’s tightly controlled military, while outside thousands rallied in a last-ditch show of opposition to laws they fear could fundamentally reshape the proudly pacifist nation.

The changes, which would allow Japanese troops to fight in defence of allies, have drawn tens of thousands of people from across society onto the streets in almost daily protests, in a show of public anger rarely seen on such a scale.

Outside parliament protesters, estimated at over 10,000, raised their voices louder as news of the decision spread through the crowd, chanting: “Protect the constitution.” One sign read: “Spread peace not war.”

“I’m ready to stay here all night. The government cannot ignore such a demonstration,” said 60-year-old farmer Yukiko Ogawa.

“It is vital that we make our opinion known, that we are here.”

Officers of the House of Councillors count ballots on the security bill at the parliament on early S...

Officers of the House of Councillors count ballots on the security bill at the parliament on early September 19, 2015 in Tokyo, Japan
Toshifumi Kitamura, AFP

Seiji Kawabe, 49, vowed the movement would live on, adding: “We have enough natural disasters, typhoons, earthquakes… we don’t need any man-made disasters.”

Organisers said more than 40,000 had gathered for Friday night’s rally, while police estimated the size of the crowd at some 11,000.

Nationalist Prime Minister Shinzo Abe says the changes were a normalisation of Japan’s military policy, which has been restricted to self-defence and aid missions by a pacifist constitution imposed by the US after World War II.

He and his backers say the laws are necessary because of threats from an increasingly belligerent China and unstable North Korea.

Opponents argue they go against both the constitution and the national psyche, and could see Japan dragged into far-flung American wars.

Speaking after the vote, Abe said the changes were “necessary in order to protect people’s lives and peaceful way of life”.

“This is designed to prevent wars,” he told journalists.

– ‘We do not forgive’ –

The decision came after days of emotional debate and delaying tactics by the opposition, which in Thursday erupted into scuffles as politicians physically tried to block a committee approving the bills.

Protesters stage a rally against Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's controversial security bi...

Protesters stage a rally against Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's controversial security bills during a demonstration outside the National Diet in Tokyo, on September 18, 2015
Kazuhiro Nogi, AFP

President of the upper house Masaaki Yamazaki said the bills passed with 148 lawmakers voting in favour, compared to 90 against.

However, the changes will not see Japanese troops dispatched to warzones any time soon and the laws will now face a ruling by the supreme court that could potentially see them overturned.

Unable to muster support to amend clauses enshrining pacifism, Abe opted instead to re-interpret the document for the purpose of his bills, ignoring warnings from scholars and lawyers that they are unconstitutional.

He has faced fierce criticism for both the laws themselves and the way he has driven them through in the face of public opposition.

There are growing signs this is taking a political toll — opinion polls show the vast majority of Japanese are against the changes, and Abe’s once sky-high approval rating is dropping.

In protests outside parliament earlier in the day, Yoko Fujiwara stood among the crowds with her six-year-old daughter, who carried a hand-written sign saying: “We do not forgive. Children are angry, too.”

“I came to the protest together with my daughter to show what real democracy is like,” said the 40-year-old graduate law student.

Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe bows after a lower house no-confidence resolution was rejecte...

Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe bows after a lower house no-confidence resolution was rejected, as the government attempts to pass the security bill at the parliament in Tokyo on September 18, 2015
Toshifumi Kitamura, AFP

Opponents of the laws, including a Nobel-Prize winner, popular musicians and other prominent figures, say the changes could fundamentally alter Japan.

Washington has backed the changes, but regional rivals China and South Korea have expressed concern at any expansion of Japanese military scope.

China’s foreign ministry spokesman Hong Lei on Friday called on Japan to “listen carefully to voices inside and outside the country calling for justice” and called on lawmakers to “take real actions to protect regional peace and stability”.

Security experts say the laws will force a re-evaluation of Japan’s place on the world stage.

“The bills are a psychological message to the world that an era in which Japan should not be involved in conflicts because of its exclusively defence-oriented policy is over,” said Hideshi Takesada, a professor at Takushoku University in Tokyo.

AFP
Written By

With 2,400 staff representing 100 different nationalities, AFP covers the world as a leading global news agency. AFP provides fast, comprehensive and verified coverage of the issues affecting our daily lives.

You may also like:

World

Calling for urgent action is the international medical humanitarian organization Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF)

World

Immigration is a symptom of a much deeper worldwide problem.

Business

Saudi Aramco President & CEO Amin Nasser speaks during the CERAWeek oil summit in Houston, Texas - Copyright AFP Mark FelixPointing to the still...

Business

A recent article in the Wall Street Journal infers that some workers might be falling out of the job market altogether.