Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

World

Iran, US go face-to-face in crunch nuclear talks

-

Iran and the US held one-on-one talks Wednesday as a deadline loomed to reach a mammoth nuclear deal, seeking common ground on the two crucial remaining issues: uranium enrichment and sanctions relief.

US Secretary of State John Kerry and other foreign ministers from the six powers meanwhile decided to hold off for at least another 24 hours joining the final round of negotiations before Monday's cut-off point.

Kerry remained in London before talks in Paris Thursday with the foreign ministers of France -- widely seen as one of the six powers with the toughest stance on Iran -- and of Saudi Arabia, itself no friend of Iran.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, whose country is a crucial player in the talks, will only attend if there is sufficient progress, Moscow's lead negotiator Sergei Ryabkov told Russian media.

The Iranian nuclear crisis
The Iranian nuclear crisis
S.Ramis/J.Jacobsen, jj/, AFP

"Right now a lot depends on Kerry's visit. Reaching a deal depends on the willingness and ability of the United States to lift sanctions" on Iran, RIA Novosti quoted a Russian source as saying.

Upping the ante, Iran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, who has been in Vienna since Tuesday, said a deal was "possible" but only if the six powers did not ask for too much.

That view was echoed Wednesday by President Hassan Rouhani.

"If the other side shows the political will to reach an accord and doesn't make excessive demands, a deal could be done," he said on his website.

But Kerry, who held the latest in a string of meetings with Zarif in Oman last week, put the onus on Iran.

"It is imperative that Iran works with us with all possible effort to prove to the world that the programme is peaceful," Kerry said in London on Tuesday.

- Drums of war -

The landmark accord being sought by Monday's deadline, after months of negotiations, is aimed at easing fears that Tehran might develop nuclear weapons under the guise of its civilian activities -- an ambition it denies.

A Russian technician inside the Russian-built Bushehr nuclear power plant in southern Iran on Octobe...
A Russian technician inside the Russian-built Bushehr nuclear power plant in southern Iran on October 26, 2010
Hamed Malekpour, Fars News Agency/AFP

It could resolve a 12-year standoff, silence talk of war, help normalise Iran's relations with the West and mark a rare foreign success for US President Barack Obama.

"A deal is in everybody's interest because it could improve the troubled global economy by making use of Iran's major economic capacities," Rouhani said in his statement.

In order to make it virtually impossible for Iran to assemble a nuclear weapon, the US, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany (the P5+1) want Iran to scale down its nuclear programme.

Some areas appear provisionally settled, such as the future of the Arak nuclear reactor and tighter UN inspections to better detect any attempt to build a bomb.

But two key issues remain to be resolved: uranium enrichment -- rendering uranium suitable for peaceful uses but also, at high purities, for a weapon -- and the pace at which sanctions on Iran would be lifted under a deal.

Iran wants to massively ramp up the number of enrichment centrifuges -- in order, it says, to make fuel for a fleet of future reactors -- while the West wants them dramatically reduced, reportedly by half.

The six powers say Iran has no such need in the foreseeable future. Russia is contracted until 2021 to fuel Iran's only power reactor at Bushehr and last week signed a deal to build -- and fuel -- several others.

In exchange for any reduction in its activities, Iran wants sanctions lifted. Bur the powers want to stagger any suspension to be sure that Iran won't renege on its commitments.

"They want everything all at once and this is not realistic," one Western diplomat involved in the talks said, calling Tehran's demands "unrealistic".

- Another extension? -

Given the differences, many analysts expect more time to be put on the clock, perhaps by agreeing certain areas and leaving others for further discussion.

The alternative -- walking away -- would be "catastrophic" and "foolish", Arms Control Association analyst Kelsey Davenport told AFP.

For now though, with another extension presenting risks of its own -- fresh US sanctions, not least -- officials insist that they remain focused on getting the job done in time.

Iran and the US held one-on-one talks Wednesday as a deadline loomed to reach a mammoth nuclear deal, seeking common ground on the two crucial remaining issues: uranium enrichment and sanctions relief.

US Secretary of State John Kerry and other foreign ministers from the six powers meanwhile decided to hold off for at least another 24 hours joining the final round of negotiations before Monday’s cut-off point.

Kerry remained in London before talks in Paris Thursday with the foreign ministers of France — widely seen as one of the six powers with the toughest stance on Iran — and of Saudi Arabia, itself no friend of Iran.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, whose country is a crucial player in the talks, will only attend if there is sufficient progress, Moscow’s lead negotiator Sergei Ryabkov told Russian media.

The Iranian nuclear crisis

The Iranian nuclear crisis
S.Ramis/J.Jacobsen, jj/, AFP

“Right now a lot depends on Kerry’s visit. Reaching a deal depends on the willingness and ability of the United States to lift sanctions” on Iran, RIA Novosti quoted a Russian source as saying.

Upping the ante, Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, who has been in Vienna since Tuesday, said a deal was “possible” but only if the six powers did not ask for too much.

That view was echoed Wednesday by President Hassan Rouhani.

“If the other side shows the political will to reach an accord and doesn’t make excessive demands, a deal could be done,” he said on his website.

But Kerry, who held the latest in a string of meetings with Zarif in Oman last week, put the onus on Iran.

“It is imperative that Iran works with us with all possible effort to prove to the world that the programme is peaceful,” Kerry said in London on Tuesday.

– Drums of war –

The landmark accord being sought by Monday’s deadline, after months of negotiations, is aimed at easing fears that Tehran might develop nuclear weapons under the guise of its civilian activities — an ambition it denies.

A Russian technician inside the Russian-built Bushehr nuclear power plant in southern Iran on Octobe...

A Russian technician inside the Russian-built Bushehr nuclear power plant in southern Iran on October 26, 2010
Hamed Malekpour, Fars News Agency/AFP

It could resolve a 12-year standoff, silence talk of war, help normalise Iran’s relations with the West and mark a rare foreign success for US President Barack Obama.

“A deal is in everybody’s interest because it could improve the troubled global economy by making use of Iran’s major economic capacities,” Rouhani said in his statement.

In order to make it virtually impossible for Iran to assemble a nuclear weapon, the US, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany (the P5+1) want Iran to scale down its nuclear programme.

Some areas appear provisionally settled, such as the future of the Arak nuclear reactor and tighter UN inspections to better detect any attempt to build a bomb.

But two key issues remain to be resolved: uranium enrichment — rendering uranium suitable for peaceful uses but also, at high purities, for a weapon — and the pace at which sanctions on Iran would be lifted under a deal.

Iran wants to massively ramp up the number of enrichment centrifuges — in order, it says, to make fuel for a fleet of future reactors — while the West wants them dramatically reduced, reportedly by half.

The six powers say Iran has no such need in the foreseeable future. Russia is contracted until 2021 to fuel Iran’s only power reactor at Bushehr and last week signed a deal to build — and fuel — several others.

In exchange for any reduction in its activities, Iran wants sanctions lifted. Bur the powers want to stagger any suspension to be sure that Iran won’t renege on its commitments.

“They want everything all at once and this is not realistic,” one Western diplomat involved in the talks said, calling Tehran’s demands “unrealistic”.

– Another extension? –

Given the differences, many analysts expect more time to be put on the clock, perhaps by agreeing certain areas and leaving others for further discussion.

The alternative — walking away — would be “catastrophic” and “foolish”, Arms Control Association analyst Kelsey Davenport told AFP.

For now though, with another extension presenting risks of its own — fresh US sanctions, not least — officials insist that they remain focused on getting the job done in time.

AFP
Written By

With 2,400 staff representing 100 different nationalities, AFP covers the world as a leading global news agency. AFP provides fast, comprehensive and verified coverage of the issues affecting our daily lives.

You may also like:

World

Iranian Interior Minister Ahmad Vahidi speaks during a press conference in Tehran on March 4, 2024 - Copyright AFP ATTA KENAREArgentina has asked Interpol...

Business

Chinese students at an e-commerce school rehearse selling hijabs and abayas into a smartphone - Copyright AFP Jade GAOJing Xuan TENGDonning hijabs and floor-length...

World

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken waves as he boards his plane at Joint Base Andrews on his way to Beijing - Copyright POOL/AFP...

Tech & Science

US voters are being fed long-debunked falsehoods ahead of the November election - Copyright AFP HERIKA MARTINEZDaniel Funke and Anuj ChopraMigrants, vaccines, pedophilia rings...