Australia and New Zealand on Tuesday hailed a landmark court decision that Japan must halt an annual Antarctic whale hunt despite fears it may try to sidestep the order.
The United Nations' Hague-based International Court of Justice on Monday ruled that Japan's whaling programme was a commercial activity disguised as science and said it must revoke existing whaling licences.
Tokyo said it would honour the ruling but did not exclude the possibility of future whaling programmes, with New Zealand expressing concerns Japan may try to circumvent the order.
"The ICJ decision sinks a giant harpoon into the legality of Japan's whaling programme," New Zealand Foreign Minister Murray McCully said.
Australia, backed by New Zealand, hauled Japan before the ICJ in 2010 in a bid to end the annual Southern Ocean hunt with Tokyo accused of exploiting a legal loophole in the 1986 ban on commercial whaling that allowed the practice to collect scientific data.
Tokyo said it would honour the ruling shortly after it was handed down at the Hague-based International Court of Justice (ICJ), but did not rule out the possibility of future whaling programmes.
"Japan shall revoke any existent authorisation, permit or licence granted in relation to JARPA II (research programme) and refrain from granting any further permits," ICJ presiding judge Peter Tomka ordered.
Tokyo was accused of exploiting a legal loophole in the 1986 ban on commercial whaling that allowed the practice to collect scientific data.
Japan had argued that its JARPA II research programme was aimed at studying the viability of whale hunting, but the ICJ found that it had failed to examine ways of doing the research without killing whales, or at least while killing fewer whales.
Agreeing with Australia Tomka said that "special permissions granted by Japan are not for purposes of scientific research".
"The evidence does not establish that the programme's design and implementation are reasonable in relation to its stated (scientific) objectives," he said.
"The Court considers that the scientific output to date has been limited."
JARPA II has been running since 2005, in which time some 3,600 minke whales have been slaughtered.
Norway and Iceland have formally challenged the 1986 International Whaling Commission (IWC) moratorium and continued with their commercial whaling operations.
Only Japan had tried to by-pass the regulations by claiming it was conducting research, even though it admitted the resulting meat ended up on people's plates.
Conservation groups hailed the ruling, which Japan said it would respect despite "deep disappointment".
"As a state that respects the rule of law … and as a responsible member of the global community, Japan will abide by the decision of the court," chief negotiator Koji Tsuruoka told reporters outside the ICJ.
Japanese government spokesman Noriyuki Shikata however did not exclude seeking a resumption of Antarctic whaling.
"In terms of a future course of action, we have to carefully examine the content of the judgement," Shikata told AFP.
- 'Not convinced' -
Militant environmental group Sea Shepherd, which has been campaigning against the Japanese whaling fleet in the Southern Ocean, said it was ready to refocus its attention on the Atlantic.
"I'm not 100 percent convinced they will abide by the ruling. They tend to agree and then do whatever they want to do anyway, that has been the history with the International Whaling Commission," Sea Shepherd founder Paul Watson told AFP by telephone.
"If they don't return (to the Antarctic) then we'll be able to refocus our efforts against Norwegian, Icelandic and Faroese whaling," he said.
The ICJ said Japan's whaling programme has led to the killing of 6,700 minke whales since it was established 18 years ago.
Canberra argued that the programme was in breach of international conventions and Japan's obligation to preserve marine mammals and their environment.
"This decision sends a clear message to governments around the world that the exploitation of animals will no longer be tolerated and animals must be protected at the highest level," said Claire Bass, head of wildlife campaigns at the World Society for the Protection of Animals.
"All eyes are now on Japan to respect this decision," she said.
"The ruling of the court demands to be observed," said Ghislaine Llewellyn, conservation manager at WWF-Australia added.
Japan has consistently defended the practice of eating whale meat as a culinary tradition and vowed it would "never stop whaling".
In April last year Tokyo announced its whaling haul from the Southern Ocean was at a record low because of "unforgivable sabotage" by Sea Shepherd activists.
Established in 1945 to rule in disputes between countries, the ICJ is the United Nations' highest judicial body and the only one of five principal UN bodies not located in New York.
Australia and New Zealand on Tuesday hailed a landmark court decision that Japan must halt an annual Antarctic whale hunt despite fears it may try to sidestep the order.
The United Nations’ Hague-based International Court of Justice on Monday ruled that Japan’s whaling programme was a commercial activity disguised as science and said it must revoke existing whaling licences.
Tokyo said it would honour the ruling but did not exclude the possibility of future whaling programmes, with New Zealand expressing concerns Japan may try to circumvent the order.
“The ICJ decision sinks a giant harpoon into the legality of Japan’s whaling programme,” New Zealand Foreign Minister Murray McCully said.
Australia, backed by New Zealand, hauled Japan before the ICJ in 2010 in a bid to end the annual Southern Ocean hunt with Tokyo accused of exploiting a legal loophole in the 1986 ban on commercial whaling that allowed the practice to collect scientific data.
Tokyo said it would honour the ruling shortly after it was handed down at the Hague-based International Court of Justice (ICJ), but did not rule out the possibility of future whaling programmes.
“Japan shall revoke any existent authorisation, permit or licence granted in relation to JARPA II (research programme) and refrain from granting any further permits,” ICJ presiding judge Peter Tomka ordered.
Tokyo was accused of exploiting a legal loophole in the 1986 ban on commercial whaling that allowed the practice to collect scientific data.
Japan had argued that its JARPA II research programme was aimed at studying the viability of whale hunting, but the ICJ found that it had failed to examine ways of doing the research without killing whales, or at least while killing fewer whales.
Agreeing with Australia Tomka said that “special permissions granted by Japan are not for purposes of scientific research”.
“The evidence does not establish that the programme’s design and implementation are reasonable in relation to its stated (scientific) objectives,” he said.
“The Court considers that the scientific output to date has been limited.”
JARPA II has been running since 2005, in which time some 3,600 minke whales have been slaughtered.
Norway and Iceland have formally challenged the 1986 International Whaling Commission (IWC) moratorium and continued with their commercial whaling operations.
Only Japan had tried to by-pass the regulations by claiming it was conducting research, even though it admitted the resulting meat ended up on people’s plates.
Conservation groups hailed the ruling, which Japan said it would respect despite “deep disappointment”.
“As a state that respects the rule of law … and as a responsible member of the global community, Japan will abide by the decision of the court,” chief negotiator Koji Tsuruoka told reporters outside the ICJ.
Japanese government spokesman Noriyuki Shikata however did not exclude seeking a resumption of Antarctic whaling.
“In terms of a future course of action, we have to carefully examine the content of the judgement,” Shikata told AFP.
– ‘Not convinced’ –
Militant environmental group Sea Shepherd, which has been campaigning against the Japanese whaling fleet in the Southern Ocean, said it was ready to refocus its attention on the Atlantic.
“I’m not 100 percent convinced they will abide by the ruling. They tend to agree and then do whatever they want to do anyway, that has been the history with the International Whaling Commission,” Sea Shepherd founder Paul Watson told AFP by telephone.
“If they don’t return (to the Antarctic) then we’ll be able to refocus our efforts against Norwegian, Icelandic and Faroese whaling,” he said.
The ICJ said Japan’s whaling programme has led to the killing of 6,700 minke whales since it was established 18 years ago.
Canberra argued that the programme was in breach of international conventions and Japan’s obligation to preserve marine mammals and their environment.
“This decision sends a clear message to governments around the world that the exploitation of animals will no longer be tolerated and animals must be protected at the highest level,” said Claire Bass, head of wildlife campaigns at the World Society for the Protection of Animals.
“All eyes are now on Japan to respect this decision,” she said.
“The ruling of the court demands to be observed,” said Ghislaine Llewellyn, conservation manager at WWF-Australia added.
Japan has consistently defended the practice of eating whale meat as a culinary tradition and vowed it would “never stop whaling”.
In April last year Tokyo announced its whaling haul from the Southern Ocean was at a record low because of “unforgivable sabotage” by Sea Shepherd activists.
Established in 1945 to rule in disputes between countries, the ICJ is the United Nations’ highest judicial body and the only one of five principal UN bodies not located in New York.
