Post News ($)     Upload Images»
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» Help Center» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»
Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

Canadian premiers can't decide on unified green plan

Posted Jul 16, 2008 by David Silverberg in Politics 3 comments
Advertising
Should we be surprised that Canadian premiers have announced they can't decide on a national plan to cut greenhouse gases? According to the Globe & Mail, "although a number of provinces have separate ideas for combatting climate change, they have not been able to reach an accord on a national scheme."

Some premiers say a national project can't be organized until after the U.S. elections kickstarts ideas. Also, the Globe reported premiers will refrain from "even trying for unanimity this year after Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty's push for a national carbon-trading idea fizzled at last year's meeting over opposition from many of his colleagues, notably Alberta Premier Ed Stelmach."

A stalled climate plan in Canada. Isn't that just an excuse for ignoring the real issues? Using the U.S. elections as an excuse may appease some public concerns but it comes off as whiny and ignorant. Sure, what the U.S. does with climate change will affect us, but it would be ideal if Canadian politicians also sought their own accord to combat greenhouse gases.
blog:603:4::0
Comments (3) Subscribe To This Thread
  • G. Robert M. Miller Posted Jul 16, 2008 by G. Robert M. Miller
    #1
    God, how pathetic... As if Canada needs the US to take the lead, that is nothing but an excuse as you say... I mean, why can't Canada take notes from the many nations in Europe that have already surpassed Kyoto measures?
  • avatar Posted Jul 16, 2008 by Bob Ewing
    #2
    It comes off as whiny and ignorant because it is. A Canada Protocol ; one that actually did something about greenhouse gas emissions would be a real step forward but one too big for the puny politicians in the provincial capitals.
  • avatar Posted Jul 17, 2008 by Sykos Masters
    #3
    I'm not surprised .... disgusted, but not surprised.

    Right now profits from the oil sands are one of the largest parts of our "economy". Who's our largest customer? Our neighbours to the south. I'm surprised they didn't pull out the old argument that "carbon emmissions don't respect borders", therefore anything Canada does wouldn't matter in the larger picture.

    Does anyone have a spare spine? I'm using mine, but I hate to see so many "leaders" without one.

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment
Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?