Email
Password
Remember meForgot password?
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter
Connect your Digital Journal account with Facebook or Twitter to use this feature.

Sabotaged for Political Content?

blog:227:0::0
By skeptikool
Posted Apr 14, 2008 in Politics
It is at some risk that I post this message, because I haven't read it. The extreme side scroll made it impossible for me to read. It was emailed to me by an acquaintance. He would not have mailed it if he knew how it would have arrived. The sentence, that I've shown in bold, spanned the message in one line of print in the original
Who, then, was responsible for constructing a message virtually impossible to read? It stinks of sabotage and of someone having been "got at".
I'm hoping that by copying and pasting, that the message may become readable. If, in doing this I introduce side scroll, I apologize.
copy:
Subject: FW: U.N. Official Calls for Study Of Neocons' Role in 9/11
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:34:11 +0000
>
>
>
> April 10, 2008 Edition> Section: Foreign> Printer-Friendly Version
>
> U.N. Official Calls for Study Of Neocons' Role in 9/11
>
> BY ELI LAKE - Staff Reporter of the Sun
> April 10, 2008
> URL: http://www2.nysun.com/article/74465
>
>
>
> WASHINGTON — A new U.N. Human Rights Council official assigned to monitor Israel is calling for an official commission to study the role neoconservatives may have played in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
>
> On March 26, Richard Falk, Milbank professor of international law emeritus at Princeton University, was named by unanimous vote to a newly created position to report on human rights in the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs. While Mr. Falk's specialty is human rights and international law, since the attacks in 2001, he has devoted some of his time to challenging what he calls the "9-11 official version."
>
> On March 24 in an interview with a radio host and former University of Wisconsin instructor, Kevin Barrett, Mr. Falk said, "It is possibly true that especially the neoconservatives thought there was a situation in the country and in the world where something had to happen to wake up the American people. Whether they are innocent about the contention that they made that something happen or not, I don't think we can answer definitively at this point. All we can say is there is a lot of grounds for suspicion, there should be an official investigation of the sort the 9/11 commission did not engage in and that the failure to do these things is cheating the American people and in some sense the people of the world of a greater confidence in what really happened than they presently possess."
Cont:

blog:227:0::0
Latest News
Top News

Corporate

Help & Support

News Links

copyright © 2014 digitaljournal.com   |   powered by dell servers