The Power of Citizen Journalism
 
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» How do I ...» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»
 

article imageStephen Colbert Makes War and Peace with Bloggers By Launching New Website

Posted Jan 25, 2007 by  David Silverberg in Entertainment | 9 comments | 7955 views
Join our team to voice opinions, share images, get paid to report news and more!
Email Print Share
Subscribe to author

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional
Digital Journal — Stephen Colbert, the tycoon of “truthiness,” is once again embracing the popularity of citizen journalism by launching a blog featuring rumoured stories and bogus news tips.

During his show last night, comedian and late-night TV host Stephen Colbert unveiled a new website during his segment “The Word.” IntegrityJustice.com, will be based on what everyday people submit, whether it be half-truths, outright lies or entertaining info. Picture The Onion meets Fark.

As Colbert said last night, “We don’t have one trained journalist on staff… Nation, if you have a substantial news tip that deserves investigation, take it somewhere else.” The caustic comedian then instructed his loyal followers to send him stories based on rumours, essentially mocking a recent Fox News story about Senator Barack Obama’s supposedly joining an Islamic school as a child. Fox based the story on unnamed sources from the online-only Insight Magazine.

As of this writing, IntegrityJustice.com is merely a bare page encouraging visitors to click a link to send story tips to ColbertNation.com’s webmaster. Early today, the site was still not active. Comedy Central spokesperson Steve Albani told DigitalJournal.com the site has “experienced a minor glitch, which [Comedy Central] is working to fix.”

Once the site goes live, expect a mountainous response from the millions of fans who watch The Colbert Report religiously. But let’s not forget what other demographic Colbert is hoping to attract: bloggers and citizen journalists. He declared, “If you’re in new media, and you see something on my site that sounds good, don’t hesitate. Post it on your own blog and then I’ll report your story as corroborating my story on my TV show.”

He’s no fool — embracing the ever-growing blogosphere will only further legitimize the comedian in the eyes of Netizens worldwide. Interactivity and marrying television with the Internet is the name of the game in TV 2.0, and Colbert is nicely following up from his green-screen challenge from last year. Mainstream media’s embrace of the Web shows how TV is seriously having to rethink its tactics to keep viewers glued to the tube.

But let’s not forget the launch of IntegrityJustice.com is also a cheeky attack on citizen journalists. Colbert is mocking the disputed credibility of certain blogs by filling his own blog with outrageous lies and unverified rumours. He even invites other sites to strengthen these faux-facts by posting them on their sites, thereby creating a cycle of lies only the most gullible would believe. (Can you smell a defamation suit coming?)

So that brings us to DigitalJournal.com — known as a credible source for breaking news, especially when users submit links to substantiate their posts. But there are a number of blogs on the Net that will print anything to grab eyeballs. So is Colbert mocking citizen journalist sites, or celebrating them? Is he actually doing a disservice to user-powered communities or is he supporting them?

However you view IntegrityJustice.com, one thing is certain: The site’s popularity will rocket to unbelievable heights simply based on the star wattage of Stephen Colbert. Anything he touches turns to 24-carat gold.

Now that’s he joining the blog-news fray, the Internet is welcoming another forum for opinionated current affairs that will surely entertain people by the millions.

article:99294:13::0
5 subscribers
Subscribe to this thread
  • avatar Posted Jan 25, 2007 by  Mr Bush
    #1
    That's what I need to do, Lunch a blog...I had one before but the secret service got mad.
  • avatar Posted Jan 25, 2007 by  bobSP
    #2
    I can't wait!
  • avatar Posted Jan 25, 2007 by  Carolyn E. Price (gohomelaker)
    #3
    My son and I were watching this last night and killed ourselves laughing over the never ending circle of corroboration. He is so good and as you say, this site will be a huge success.

    I don't think he's doing blogger's a disservice because Colbert is in the "entertainment" business and should be viewed as such. Anything coming from his site should be viewed as "tongue in cheek".
  • avatar Posted Jan 25, 2007 by  Chris V. (cgull)
    #4
    It will be fun, it will be a great compliment to the TV Show, so people can read online and share comments and view
  • avatar Posted Jan 25, 2007 by  Pamela Jean (GotTheScoop)
    #5
    I have never watched this guy, so please forgive me if I find a problem with this plan of his.

    Doesn't this only serve to further "water down" the validity of any news story, eventually leading us all to go the route of never believing anything we read?

    I think the media should be held accountable for launching unsubstantiated news stories, that the public should demand such accountability!

    Instead, we are welcoming a site that says "who cares if it is true" just post it, and I'll post it to corroborate your story, and so on and so on ad infinitum.

    Soon there will be a wellspring of sites popping up - we all know that to copy anothers action is considered the greatest compliment - and the web will be flooded with bogus, made up stories. Then where will we be?

    Who will we trust? Who will be bringing us "truth" - or will "truth" no longer exist as we once knew it, and blogs will endlessly battle the true definition of "truth"?

    This seems like a slippery slope to me....but, again, I don't know this guy. Course, what about all the people just like me that don't know this guy and so on and so on ad infinitum?
  • avatar Posted Jan 25, 2007 by  Lightening
    #6
    I see your point GTS...

    The sad thing is that what you are saying is true. So that means that the only sources that we will consider true will be from MAJOR news reporters like Reuters, AP, BBC and perhaps a few more like them.

    That gives WAY too much power to a very few sources. Opens up the door for control of information deemed reliable.

    I have been thinking we are lucky to be able to use the internet to communicate what is going on... to the masses if necessary. But it is true that already there is so much misinformation you can't really trust much of it anymore.

    I laughed out loud for sure when he showed "Wikipedia". What a crock it can be!!

    Hard to say what impact his website will have, but I am sure it will be funny/shocking/out of line/offensive/embarrassing... and entertaining for some. Fun unless YOU are the one being slandered or ridiculed. What a society we live in.
  • Diana in Miami Posted Jan 26, 2007 by  Diana in Miami
    #7
    @ Pamela Jean (GotTheScoop):
    I have never watched this guy, so please forgive me if I find a problem with this plan of his.

    Doesn't this only serve to further "water down" the validity of any news story, eventually leading us all to go the route of never believing anything we read?

    I think the media should be held accountable for launching unsubstantiated news stories, that the public should demand such accountability!


    GTS, It's too bad you don't watch the show because you are totally getting the point. Stephen is using comedy to shine light and kick the shins of irresponsible reporting.

    Lightening, as a fan scouring the net for all things 'Stephen', I recall last year when there was misinformation about Colbert himself on his own Wikipedia page and it was finally locked from editing. Surley, that was his motivator to go after Wikipedia. This is Colbert's version of Wiki, it's called "wikiality":
    http://www.wikiality.com/Main_Page
  • avatar Posted Jan 27, 2007 by  David Silverberg
    #8
    @ Diana in Miami:
    @ Pamela Jean (GotTheScoop):
    I have never watched this guy, so please forgive me if I find a problem with this plan of his.

    Doesn't this only serve to further "water down" the validity of any news story, eventually leading us all to go the route of never believing anything we read?

    I think the media should be held accountable for launching unsubstantiated news stories, that the public should demand such accountability!


    GTS, It's too bad you don't watch the show because you are totally getting the point. Stephen is using comedy to shine light and kick the shins of irresponsible reporting.

    Lightening, as a fan scouring the net for all things 'Stephen', I recall last year when there was misinformation about Colbert himself on his own Wikipedia page and it was finally locked from editing. Surley, that was his motivator to go after Wikipedia. This is Colbert's version of Wiki, it's called "wikiality":
    http://www.wikiality.com/Main_Page


    Nice Diana, you got it! GTS n' Lightening, realize Stephen Colbert is on our side, deep down -- but he often masks what he does in a veil of phony right-wingedness...And that's the genius of what he does.
  • avatar Posted Jan 27, 2007 by  Pamela Jean (GotTheScoop)
    #9
    Yes, I got it too - I posted before I had watched the video clip and just based my comments on your article alone....I did get it then, but it really became glaringly apparent after seeing the thing played out..
    Basically we are already there with the media........kind of scary really when you think about it.

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?