Basically supporters of the bill say that they deserve to know whether the food they are buying has been genetically modified.
Jessica Mitchell, a parent who is in favor of the bill, was quoted as stating in an AP report that, “I and many mothers deserve the right to know what we are feeding our children.”
proponents of the bill testified before the House committee, it passed its second reading on Thursday, but the bill was amended
so as to only apply to produce imported from outside Hawaii.
some conjecture by opponents that labeling would cause a rise in food prices. However, house agriculture committee Chairwoman Jessica Wooley says that as the bill only affects produce brought in from outside Hawaii, it will benefit local farms and won’t cause food prices to rise.
However, Occupy Monsanto Maui
is reporting disappointment with the amendment on their Facebook page.
They state that the amendment "only covers incoming raw agricultural products, which means that it basically covers very little, except a little crookneck squash, any Monsanto sweet corn brought fresh into the state, or if a non-browning GMO apple is approved." So maybe it is not time to get too excited.
Recently a California labeling initiative, Proposition 37
, lost by a small margin after Big Pesticide donated $45 million in advertising against GMO labeling. Other states that are also trying for labeling are New Mexico and Washington.