In a blog post
published around 5 p.m. ET Tuesday, Systrom stressed the company, owned by Facebook, wouldn't sell photos uploaded to its application. Systrom said it is "working on updated language in the terms to make sure this is clear."
He went on to say, "The language we proposed also raised question about whether your photos can be part of an advertisement. We do not have plans for anything like this and because of that we’re going to remove the language that raised the question."
Beginning Monday, Instagram users began to revolt online when they learned of a proposal
Systrom is promising
to remove "confusing" language users might misinterpret, but it's unclear when the new policy proposal will be provided to the public.
His final paragraph
relayed privacy information many Instagram users may already know - "Nothing has changed about the control you have over who can see your photos. If you set your photos to private, Instagram only shares your photos with the people you’ve approved to follow you. We hope that this simple control makes it easy for everyone to decide what level of privacy makes sense."
The co-founder did admit that the company might
do something like promote a brand such as Topshop and show Facebook visitors which of their friends already follow Topshop, blurbs that could include their user name and avatar, as the Times points out.
By contrast, Google's policy does not allow
the company to sell photographs uploaded through Picasa or its social media channel Google+. Its policy says: "The rights you grant in this license are for the limited purpose of operating, promoting, and improving our services."