Email
Password
Remember meForgot password?
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter
Connect your Digital Journal account with Facebook or Twitter to use this feature.

article imageScientist Melba Ketchum claims Bigfoot DNA human-cryptid hybrid

By JohnThomas Didymus     Nov 27, 2012 in Odd News
According to a press release by DNA Diagnostics Inc., a study conducted by a team of experts, led by Dr. Melba Ketchum of Nacogdoches, TX., has confirmed that the semi-mythical Bigfoot is a relative of the human species that arose about 15,000 years ago.
The press release describes Ketchum as a veterinarian with 27 years of experience in genetics research, including forensics, who has previously been published as a participant in mapping the equine genome. The release says she began testing the DNA of purported Sasquatch hair samples 5 years ago.
The release reads:
"A team of scientists can verify that their five-year-long DNA study, currently under peer-review, confirms the existence of a novel hominin hybrid species, commonly called 'Bigfoot' or 'Sasquatch,' living in North America. Researchers' extensive DNA sequencing suggests that the legendary Sasquatch is a human relative that arose approximately 15,000 years ago as a hybrid cross of modern Homo sapiens with an unknown primate species."
Dr. Ketchum said: “Our study has sequenced 20 whole mitochondrial genomes and utilized next generation sequencing to obtain 3 whole nuclear genomes from purported Sasquatch samples. The genome sequencing shows that Sasquatch mtDNA is identical to modern Homo sapiens, but Sasquatch nuDNA is a novel, unknown hominin related to Homo sapiens and other primate species. Our data indicate that the North American Sasquatch is a hybrid species, the result of males of an unknown hominin species crossing with female Homo sapiens."
Ketchum claims that Sasquatch nuclear DNA is "incredibly novel" with "distinctly" non-human, non-archaic hominin, and non-ape sequences. Ketchum described the DNA as "a mosaic of human and novel non-human sequence."
Ketchum claims that their test has ruled out Homo neanderthalis and the Denisova hominin as contributors to the purported Sasquatch mtDNA or nuDNA. Ketchum said: "The male progenitor that contributed the unknown sequence to this hybrid is unique as its DNA is more distantly removed from humans than other recently discovered hominins like the Denisovan individual."
Ketchum suggests that the "males of an unknown hominin species" had sex with modern human females and produced the North American Sasquatch.
The Register reports that Ketchum said the samples used came from researchers tracking Bigfoot.
Melba Ketchum
Melba Ketchum
Twitter
image:132473:0::0
The Register reports Ketchum said: "Four other university laboratories have tested the samples prior to this study and they all found human DNA, so they all made the assumption that the samples were contaminated. That's why we took a forensic approach, going to two different laboratories and testing two different ways and we were very careful to avoid contamination."
Ketchum suggested that because Sasquatch are a human hybrid with modern human maternal ancestry, government must recognize them "as an indigenous people and protect their human and Constitutional rights against those who would see in their physical and cultural differences a 'license' to hunt, trap, or kill them."
But Live Science comments that since no one has ever trapped or killed a Sasquatch and it is not even clear that the creature exists, it is doubtful they need any federal protection.
The release claims that the paper is currently under peer-review. The Register reports that Ketchum said the team hadn't intended to make the news public beforehand, but that one of the Russian team leaked the information.
Live Science reports the scientific community is skeptical about the claims and that nothing can be said about it since it has not appeared in any peer-reviewed scientific journal. Live Science suggests a "simple" explanation of Ketchum's claims: that the samples were contaminated with DNA from human handlers, and points out that no one knows how the alleged Bigfoot samples were collected or where they were found.
Live Science asks:
"How did the team definitively determine that the samples were from a Bigfoot?... If the samples were found in the wild, how do they know it wasn't left by another animal — or possibly even a hunter, hiker or camper?"
Ketchum is not the only scientist who claims to have collected Bigfoot DNA samples. Digital Journal reported in May that a joint project between Oxford University and Switzerland's Lausanne Museum of Zoology was examining organic remains claimed to belong to cryptid creatures. Wolfson College, Oxford, also requested from the public "samples of hair and teeth of cryptids."
Bryan Sykes of Oxford's Wolfson College, working with Michael Sartori, director of Lausanne Museum in Switzerland, said: "I'm challenging and inviting the cryptozoologists to come up with the evidence instead of complaining that science is rejecting what they have to say."
Digital Journal also reported last month that Spike TV, in partnership with Lloyd's of London, offered a bounty of $10 million as part of its new reality television show "10 million Bigfoot Bounty," to any person or team that can first provide "indisputable evidence" to a panel of experts that Bigfoot exists.
More about Bigfoot, Dna, Human, bigfoot dna
More news from
Latest News
Top News

Corporate

Help & Support

News Links

copyright © 2014 digitaljournal.com   |   powered by dell servers