The results of this study
were reported in the Daily Telegraph
. The first question the reader will ask is did we really need a scientific study to tell us that? The study itself is based on a rather small sample, and appears to have related purely to Texas Hold 'Em, presumably the no limit version. It claims too that chess is entirely a game of skill; any adept chess player will tell you this is not true; chess has psychological factors as well as an element of luck, not to mention swindles.
Let's though stay with No Limit Hold 'Em. Here are a few examples; one all players will recognise is the moron who can never fold an ace.
The above hand was played in the William Hill Sunday Facebook Freeroll
on August 26, 2012. The players are getting close to the money but the two short stacks need to pick up a few chips to survive. The first player makes a move, all-in with QJ. The second player reads him correctly, and follows. There is a rule in poker that says you can raise with anything but you need something to call. A-10 is not a great hand, but the third player has a terrible hand. Heads up against A-10 he is less than 23% although he also has around an 11% chance to tie the hand. Here, he is an even bigger underdog; surprisingly, QJ is favourite, because there are two aces out. Still, the big stack calls with the worst hand, outdraws both the short stacks, and undoubtedly cashes. Would any person in his right mind attribute his winning this hand to skill?
The above hand shows two players all-in pre-flop; a pair of 10s is not that great a hand, even heads up, 7s less so, but again the weaker hand wins. Skill or luck? The next hand is just plain silly.
The final hand is excusable. The guy with aces is very short stacked at level 2, so setting him all-in here is not unwarranted heads up. Having said that, no one should have any doubt that No Limit Hold 'Em at least is a game largely of luck, even if some players are consistently lucky while others are not.