Remember meForgot password?
    Log in with Twitter

article imageOp-Ed: More money, more debt and more austerity for Britain

By Alexander Baron     Jul 20, 2012 in Politics
The Coalition Government has announced more investment in both the railways and infrastructure. And more austerity to pay for it.
The Government has announced over £9 billion of investment in Britain's railways. On the face of it, this is good news, but people should see the bigger picture. Britain's railways are - ostensibly - private companies. So what we see here is the Government giving public money to private companies, another word for this giving is subsidy. Now the simple question is, why should the British Government or any government subsidise a private company, any private company? Not without an extremely good reason.
Britain's railways are funded approximately half by the taxpayer and half by the passenger. Logically, either passengers should pay the entire cost of their travel - which would cripple many commuters - or the Government should run the network on behalf of all of us, which would mean it could reduce fares considerably, and even abolish fares not only on the railways but on much of the transport network, certainly within major cities. Do the math.
As one Guardian correspondent pointed out earlier this week, it is ultimately the poor who will pay the price for this, because this subsidy is a transfer of wealth into the pockets of the rich.
Meanwhile, Chancellor Osborne is set to announce a further £50 billion of investment in the country's infrastructure. Again, this sounds good, but it is not new, debt-free money that will be financing this programme, but new loan guarantees.
If the Chancellor has promised more borrowed money for the infrastructure, his boss has promised only more austerity, another decade of it. In an interview with the Daily Telegraph, David Cameron said he expects the (manufactured) Eurozone crisis to drag on until 2020. Realists will add at least another five years to that forecast; cynics, another ten.
This opinion article was written by an independent writer. The opinions and views expressed herein are those of the author and are not necessarily intended to reflect those of
More about David Cameron, George osborne, Austerity
More news from
Latest News
Top News