Op-Ed: Big Pharma - The Pallid Success of the Germ Theory

Ever wondered why we still have no cure for HIV, Cancer, Hepatitis, Leukemia, Alzheimers, the common cold or flu? Here I question the tenets of the Germ Theory and compare it to its ancient and forgotten competitor, The Terrain or Cellular Theory.

I get a daily email from Reuters Health News that tells me all the up-to-date progress that Big Pharma is making with its drug research. I've been watching Big Pharma for several years now. And isn't it peculiar that after nearly a century of modern medicine, after the discoveries of anti-biotics, vaccination, genome therapy, biotech, cloning, nanotechnology, stem cell research etc., we are still no closer to an actual cure for Cancer or AIDS or heart disease or Alzheimer's or HIV etc - the list goes on and on ? All the drugs that are spewed out of Big Pharma's labs are essentially anti-inflammatory painkillers for particular conditions. These drugs might make the patient feel more comfortable but very few of these drugs are outright magic-bullet curatives are they? Perhaps I'm being too cynical here, but maybe this is the way Big Pharma likes it, maybe this is firm secret policy within the drugs companies. After all, if there was a simple and cheap one-stop cure for cancer, these patients would have no further need for their very expensive cancer drugs, radiotherapy or surgery prcedures would they? So Big Pharma seems to prefer inventing drugs/procedures that the patient will have to take for a long time. Look at the "Cancer Industry" for example. It's HUGE. Hundreds of expensive drugs, Radiography machines, expensive surgery. My goodness -- if a successful cure was found for cancer, what would happen to all this huge industry? Dependency seems to be key to Big Pharm's illusive strategy. Simply because this continuing dependency will naturally mean more continuing profit for Big Pharma. This dependency is a bit like a drug pusher making the user so dependent on his drugs that he buys more and more and more. Hence the huge profits. Or perhaps I'm being a little unkind again. Perhaps the whole basis of Medicine and Big Pharma - The Germ Theory - is incorrect? So what does the Germ Theory say? Basically put, this theory says this: One germ -->One disease --> One cure. But this theory evolved way back in the late 1800s, and was "invented" by Louis Pasteur. However this wasn't the only theory that was prevalent at the time - there was another theory, postulated by Antoine Bechamp (and backed up later by Gunther Enderlein, Claude Bernarde, Royal Rife, Gaston Naessens etc.) called The Terrain or Cellular Theory. For a simple comparison between The Germ Theory and the Terrain Theory(in table format), please click here. Notable also, is that the Germ Theory is the only theory that Big Pharma dares to allow -- perhaps because this theory fits their money-making "business model" so well. This model conveniently allows Big Pharma to continuously invent thousands of expensive, singular drugs that are only useful for one particular disease or condition. They invent a drug or procedure, patent it and then make huge profits off their sales despite the drug's or procedure's usually vicious or unpredictable side-affects. The Cellular Theory would kill this business practice dead. But any independent medical or herbal advance or cure, anything that threatens Big Pharma's money making drug machine, any small competitor that comes near to a cancer cure, any American researcher that has an odd and very peculiar wish to save the lives of desperate and diseased people instead of making money for shareholders, well, these upstarts are either banished or jailed(Check out Gaston Naessens or Tullio Simoncini on Google and see what you get - both threatened Big Pharma with cancer cures). I'll give you another example: Pau D'arco also known as Taheebo, has been used as a successful cancer cure in Paraguay and Brazil for many years now. The indigenous Paraguayan Indians have been drinking the tea from the bark of this plant as a tonic for centuries. Big Pharma heard about it, researched the plant and discovered the active ingredient - lepachol. Big Pharma then did their research bit, multiplying the concentration of their now synthetic lepachol 10,000 times stronger than exists within the plant and then fed it to rats who all died. Therefore, it was decreed that this plant has no effect on cancer, and the FDA banned it as a dangerous plant!! Ah, so easy to banish the competition!! But they're still drinking the tea in Brazil and Paraguay, still curing cancer(easy to find evidence on the internet). Other cancer cures? Try Sodium Bicarbonate solution. Check it out here. Have a Candida problem? Try Sodium Bicarbonate or Iodine(Lugol's Solution) or Hydrogen Peroxide. I've use all these simple, cheap remedies for other problems and never felt better(I'm 60 y.o.) with no aches and pains, no rheumatism or arthritis, taking no drugs and my heart's good. But you're probably shaking your head in a no is my guess. If these work then why don't Big Pharma tout these as remedies? Well, because there's no money in it is there? You can't patent natural base chemicals like Hydrogen Peroxide, Iodine or Sodium Bicarbonate can you? And it wouldn't be so politic to admit that such simple cures could possibly be more effective than Big Pharma's own singularly expensive remedies, would it? So Big Pharma would far rather you buy their expensive drugs(for a long time), since this returns far more profit doesn't it? And if you consider all these simple remedies, they all fit in very well with Bechamp's Terrain Theory, don't you think? - Simply because you are treating and changing the inner terrain of the body - making it more alkaline, more oxygenated (You are, in effect, creating the conditions for a healthy body, strong immune system etc.) - something that Cancer and Candida microbes hate because they like anaerobic and acid terrain conditions. And you might well ask, why hasn't anyone set out to prove, by way of research, the efficacy of The Cellular or Terrain Theory then? In America, it takes $200 million to prove safe proof of purpose for just one drug to the satisfaction of the FDA, that's why. And the only sector that has that kind of funding is Big Pharma(they seem to have it all sewn up, don't they?). There are no small start-up biotech companies or Alternative Therapy clinics that have this kind of money. So they are completely shut out of this drug loop by both Big Pharma and the FDA(and indirectly by the US Government).

On his deathbed, with his scientific adversary Claude Bernard present, Louis Pasteur finally admitted :"....You are right my friend, microbes are nothing, the terrain is everything..."

But too late, the wheels of Big Pharma had already started to spin, twist and dance to The Germ Theory.... Referenced Articles: How Louis Pasteur Plagiarized Antoine Bechamp's Work and Lied about Certain Aspects of His Germ Theory The Current Status and Behaviour of Big Pharma Today

On the Curious Working Practices of the FDA Pasteur's Mistakes Claude Bernard

Gunther Enderlein Antoine Bechamp Gaston Naessens Royal Raymond Rife Virginia Livingston More Recent Confirmation of Pleomorphism

A Simple Cancer Treatment - Treating the "Terrain" and not the Germ Hodgkin's Disease - Research Evidence of Pleomorphic Bacteria In Praise of Four Women Against Cancer

Alan Cantwell M.D. -