Email
Password
Remember meForgot password?
    Log in with Twitter

article imageOp-Ed: The Good Side of Bottled Water

By David Zetland     Oct 9, 2008 in Environment
To some people, bottled water is the embodiment of evil. There is, however, a good side to bottled water. Consider how bottled water companies compete with local tap water providers, making them work harder to do their jobs effectively.
Bottled water companies are not popular these days (see, e.g., Stop Nestle Waters or FLOW, the Movie) -- for a lot of reasons.
My personal belief, btw, is that people should drink what they want, but I avoid bottled water.
When I was in Atlanta, I chatted with a guy from Nestle, a groundwater hydrologist who professed to be shocked at the "reception" Nestle got in McCloud. I gave my opinion on why Nestle got tossed out (offering a price that was too low) and suggested that Nestle could have made a deal if it had divided the wholesale profit (e.g., wholesale price less capital and operating costs) 50/50 with McCloud -- instead of 99.5/0.5.**
He hadn't thought of that equity argument. Instead, he had thought that Nestle had made a deal with the McCloud city council and that that deal had reflected a bargain that was acceptable to both sides. That's when I explained that a lot of people (apparently) had objected to the council's "give away" and rejected the deal as bad for the community. Anyways...
After that bit, I told him that the bottled water industry needs to do something about its image (duh!), and I suggested that one thing it could do is test and certify that ALL bottled water met or exceeded the toughest quality standards for tap water. I'm sure that a lot of people buy bottled water because they worry about the quality of their tap water, but these same people are unhappy that bottled water is not tested/regulated to tap water standards.
That thought got me to thinking...
The biggest problem in urban water supply (to me) is not whether the company is public or private -- it's that water companies are monopolies. That means, by definition, that the company faces no competition. Companies (governments!) without competition are bad for consumers because they tend -- over time -- to offer lower quality products at higher prices.* Why work when people MUST come to you?
So, the good side of bottled water is that you can take it anywhere. When it gets there, it competes with local tap water. If bottled water is of higher quality, people will notice. Some will just drink the bottled water, but others will complain to their water company -- insisting that it offer the same quality, which they should already be doing!
Bottom Line: Bottled water vendors should meet or beat tap water standards, and people should insist that their water companies do the same. Competition with local water monopolies can only help consumers.
* I could give hundreds of examples but note that the most persistent monopoly is a government monopoly: The USPS has controlled our mailboxes since 1775. Think businesses are bad? Not even close. (Consider how Microsoft destroyed IBM and is, in turn, being destroyed by Google, which will be destroyed by...)
** If Nestle has a profit of $0.02/16.9 oz bottle [see 4 here] and offered McCloud $0.70/1,000 gallons, then McCloud would have received 0.46% of that profit. Ouch.
This opinion article was written by an independent writer. The opinions and views expressed herein are those of the author and are not necessarily intended to reflect those of DigitalJournal.com
More about Bottled Water, Nestle, Tap water, Economics, Monopoly
 
Latest News
Top News