article imageOpinion: Dinosaurs 'lucky' to win evolutionary contest with crocs?

By Paul Wallis.
Subscribe to author
Published Sep 14, 2008 by  Paul Wallis - 18 votes, 3 comments
Share on Facebook  
Listen - Email - Print
Recipient email:
You can enter up to 10 comma-separated email addresses.
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

In the pre-dino era, the Triassic, the two main classes of reptile were the proto dinosaurs, and the ancestral crocodilians, known as crurotarsans. Theory says the dinosaurs out-competed the crocs, but now some people are saying it was just pure luck.
This is a pretty hot topic in paleontology. Ancestral crocs, as a matter of fact, weren’t the super-advanced, ultra-tough monsters we know. They were a pretty diverse group including the little 2 metre long dino-like, two legged Terrestrisuchus, which was a land dweller, looking quite a lot like a cross between a lizard and an Allosaurus.
In the Jurassic croc species included marine crocs, some looking like icthyosaurs, and one gharial-type actual croc, and a miniature two foot long, thing called Bernissartia, much like the modern types, appeared in Europe. Later, in the Cretaceous, a giant croc, Deinosuchus, was the largest ever crocodile at 15 metres long, three times bigger than the average saltwater croc of today.
Scientific American
explains the heart of the debate:
It is a longstanding mystery why dinosaurs became and remained so plentiful for more than 180 million years. The traditional theory: dinosaurs suddenly replaced other land animals because of special traits that gave them an evolutionary advantage, such as being warm-blooded, nimble and able to occupy varied habitats. This new research presents a fresh mathematical analysis of previous fossil data that indicates that ancestors of modern-day crocodiles had as diverse body types as early dinos, with whom they co-existed for some 30 million years.
Although the data doesn't directly contradict the idea of dinosaur superiority, the authors say it is likely that these crocodilians were even more successful than dinosaurs, the latter of which may have survived major extinctions due to sheer luck.
This is a little iffy.
Crocs are, and were, ultra successful. There’s a bit of a dichotomy, however, in seeing them as an alternative to the dinosaurs. The crurotarsans were undeniably a diverse group as this list from Wikipedia indicates.
However, this argument has a flaw, or possibly several. Part of the problem is what you call a non-dinosaur, and what you call a crurotarsan.
The crurotarsans were also beneficiaries of evolution, in the form of crocodiles, which are one of the all time most successful species.
The non-crocodilians were a pretty diverse group, and apparently in terms of classifications, crurotarsans are supposed to include Archosaurs.
That’s begging the question, more than a bit, if they're included. It's not clear from the Scientific American article if this is the case, but as a classification, it's very misleading.
Archosaurs are the ancestral reptile group. They predate both the Triassic groups. They also included a few croc-like creatures, including Champosaurus. Other supposed crurotarsan species include Desmatosuchus, a thecodont, which is yet another class of reptile.
Then there's the "more is better" argument:
Brusatte and researchers from the University of Bristol in England expanded this research by analyzing the existing fossil record to show crurotarsans may have even been more successful than dinos. First, the team constructed a new family tree to separate the dinosaurs from the croc ancestors. They then assembled a database of 65 dinosaur and crurotarsan species that included over 400 skeletal features, such as whether they had beaks or shorter arms than legs.
If dinosaurs were more fit for the environment, they should have had a higher rate of evolution and more diverse body types. Instead the researchers found that the two groups evolved at similar rates and that the crurotarsans had a wider range of body types, suggesting that they had actually adapted to more lifestyles and ecological niches.
No.
This is where the logic breaks down, badly.
Evolution isn’t some sort of even-handed balance, affecting all species equally. To evolve, certain conditions have to apply, and some species take advantage while others can’t. Forms of evolution are also highly variable.
The dinosaurs were considered to have been well adapted to a huge global drought which occurred in the Triassic. It doesn’t follow that the non-dinosaurs, like the mammal-like reptiles, or the crurotarsans, were necessarily superior species.
The information presented indicates the crurotarsans died out on land specifically because they couldn't adapt to an environmental change, and the dinosaurs, obviously, could.
Even if the Archosaurs aren't included, this argument has some large holes in it. This particular extinction, as far as is known, wasn’t some sudden event like an asteroid, as the proponents of the theory seem to think. It was a long drawn out thing, a big environmental shift, and evolutionary pressures would have been intense.
The croc species of crurotarsans were much better off, obviously, in their habitat, than the land dwellers. They had a working food supply.
The dinosaurs went on to dominate the land, rather noticeably unchallenged by any other species, including mammals, amphibians, and other reptile types.
The mistake is assuming that crurotarsans and dinosaurs were interchangeable as land dwellers.
The basic non-croc forms of crurotarsans, (even if you allow for the Archosaurs as being crurotarsans, which frankly I don’t), were pretty much basic reptiles, lizard form. Some added features, but not in the class or range of the big Jurassic dinosaurs. Their morphology is very basic, and even allowing for letting in everything and everything as a crurotarsan, many of them are just varieties of crocs.
There were some big ones, some strange shapes, some large predators, but developmentally, you don’t see the emergence of the drastically different classes.
This is an interesting “what if” theory, but really, it’d be nice to pin down the subject a lot better, expand the evolutionary findings to include known Triassic conditions, and define what's classified as crurotarsans for the benefit of those trying to understand the issues.
And leave the Archosaurs out of the equation.
This opinion article was written by an independent writer. The opinions and views expressed herein are those of the author and are not necessarily intended to reflect those of DigitalJournal.com
article:259810:18::0

Virtual goods now a $5-billion global industry

With minutes to go before the end of the day, you visit Facebook and send out a quick birthday cake to a friend. It's $1 for the virtual icon that is simply displayed on their page. Sound silly? Well, these types of transactions are now worth billions.
Published 19 hours ago by  KJ Mullins in Internet | 1 comment

What Facebook, Twitter, PayPal can teach us about going viral Special

Going viral isn't a finger-snap way to achieve mass popularity. In fact, as author Adam L. Penenberg explains to Digitaljournal.com, some of the top tech companies found viral success by creating a product that had to be shared to be useful.
Published 21 hours ago by  David Silverberg in Internet | 1 comment

TopFinds: Investigating Dental Health in U.S., Rihanna Speaks Out

The dental health insurance controversy in the U.S. The shocking mass killing at Fort Hood, Texas. Rihanna breaks her silence about domestic abuse. These are the top stories making headlines around the world.
Published Nov 6, 2009 by  David Silverberg in Internet

Alleged Orlando Shooter Apprehended

According to Orlando police, Orlando shooting suspect Jason Rodriguez has been captured without incident. Rodriguez was captured at his mother's house around 2:20 this afternoon.
Published Nov 6, 2009 by  Joe Gullo in Crime | 1 comment

Figure skater Elvis Stojko marks beginning of music career

Elvis Stojko, a two-time Olympic silver medalist, released the first single from his new album "100 Lifetimes" yesterday. It marks the beginning of the skating champion's music career.
Published Nov 6, 2009 by  Kevin Jess in Entertainment
apis-129186 apis-129159 apis-129155 apis-129156 apis-129148
Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?