The Power of Citizen Journalism
 
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» How do I ...» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»
 

article imageStudy Says: Eat Less Help the Environment

Posted Jul 23, 2008 by  Bob Ewing in Environment | 9 comments | 186 views
Join our team to voice opinions, share images, get paid to report news and more!
Email Print Share
Subscribe to author

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional
Study finds a healthier diet and a return to traditional farming can help reduce energy consumption in US food system by 50 percent.
In the United States an estimated 19 percent of total energy used is taken up in the production and supply of food. The majority of this energy comes from non-renewable sources.

David Pimentel and his colleagues at Cornell University in New York have published a study in the Springer journal Human Ecology setting out a number of strategies which could potentially cut fossil energy fuel use in the food system by as much as 50 percent.


The number one suggestions is individuals need to eat less, especially considering that the average American consumes an estimated 3,747 calories a day, a staggering 1200-1500 calories over recommendations.

Animal products and junk and preprocessed food dominate the American diet. These food require more energy to produce foods such as potatoes, rice, fruits and vegetables do.

Reduce junk food intake and lower meat consumption and realize a massive impact on fuel consumption as well as improving health.


A move towards more traditional, organic farming methods would help because conventional meat and dairy production is extremely energy intensive. Similarly, in crop production, reduced pesticide use, increased use of manure, cover crops and crop rotations improve energy efficiency.


Changes in how foods are processed, packaged and distributed could also help to reduce fuel consumption. Although well-established energy-saving considerations in lighting, heating and packaging materials all have their part to play, the authors again highlight individual responsibility as having the biggest impact.

The most dramatic reduction in energy used for food processing would come about if consumers reduced their demand for highly processed foods. This would also help cut down food miles and its related fuel cost as US food travels an average of 2,400 km before it is consumed.


The consumer is in the strongest position to contribute to a reduction in energy use. As individuals embrace a ‘greener’ lifestyle, an awareness of the influence their food choices have on energy resources might be added encouragement for them to buy good, local produce and avoid highly processed, heavily packaged and nutritionally inferior food. This would not only lead towards a cleaner environment, but also towards better health.
article:257755:9::0
2 subscribers
Subscribe to this thread
  • avatar Posted Jul 23, 2008 by  Chris V. (cgull)
    #1
    Eat less (or Eat right) and Buy Local, that should help immensely.
  • avatar Posted Jul 23, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #2
    @ Chris V. (cgull)
    Eat less (or Eat right) and Buy Local, that should help immensely.

    makes sense
  • avatar Posted Jul 23, 2008 by  Nikki W (karateblossom)
    #3
    3700 calories? ouch. I guess I don't come close to that so whew!!!!! 3500 = 1 lb of weight so if a totally sedentary individual is consuming 3700 (NEVER leaving the couch or bed), no wonder they are gaining.

    Most, however, burn calories by simple walking to the car (or fridge), gardening, etc, thereby delaying the gain over time.

    The key - burn more than consumed every day to lose. Burn the same to maintain.

    To transport that much food makes sense - stocking shelves, stocking pantries....etc. every little helps. Could you imagine if we all consumed exactly 2,100 calories a day and sweated consistently for 30 consecutive minutes every single day?
  • avatar Posted Jul 23, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #4
    Could you imagine if we all consumed exactly 2,100 calories a day and sweated consistently for 30 consecutive minutes every single day?
    hmm, fit, sweaty people and a clean environment. :-)
  • avatar Posted Jul 23, 2008 by  Nikki W (karateblossom)
    #5
    @ Bob Ewing
    hmm, fit, sweaty people and a clean environment. :-)

    LOL...well, we can dream, can't we?
  • avatar Posted Jul 23, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #6
    @ Nikki W (karateblossom)
    LOL...well, we can dream, can't we?

    always.
  • skeptikool Posted Jul 23, 2008 by  skeptikool
    #7
    Too much gluttony and waist/waste - that's for sure. We can be much healthier as we reduce healthcare costs, but it takes effort - particularly for the computer-addicted.
  • avatar Posted Jul 23, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #8
    @ Bob Ewing
    hmm, fit, sweaty people and a clean environment. :-)


    LOLOL!

    @ skeptikool
    Too much gluttony and waist/waste - that's for sure. We can be much healthier as we reduce healthcare costs, but it takes effort - particularly for the computer-addicted.


    I may be computer addicted, but I never sit at the computer for more than 30-40 minutes tops and then I have to get up and move or do something. Bad back isn't kind to me.
  • avatar Posted Jul 23, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #9
    @ skeptikool
    Too much gluttony and waist/waste - that's for sure. We can be much healthier as we reduce healthcare costs, but it takes effort - particularly for the computer-addicted.

    effort worth the effort.

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?