The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     How do I ...»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageOpinion: Joe Lieberman Supports McCain, Becomes an Enigma to Democrats

Posted Jul 20, 2008 by  Dave G. (TruthMan) in Politics | 8 comments | 479 views
Next in Politics
Related News
Advertising
Connecticut's Joe Lieberman is below a 50 per cent approval rating in the polls for his home state and has lost many advisers. Does he worry? No, but the Democrats can't figure him out.
Connecticut's Joe Lieberman's senatorial term ends in 2012. The Democrats reluctantly tolerate his hawkish views on Iraq and Iran with his support for Republican presidential nominee John McCain because they only have a one-vote majority in the U.S. Senate. Lieberman refers to himself as an ''independent Democrat.'' He predicts that the Democrats will do well this congressional election.

He isn't worried if Obama wins the presidential election. He is sticking to his guns about what he is doing today: ''Overall, I'm doing what I think is right today, and I'm not going to change that because of any concerns about what might happen politically a year from now or three years from now.'' His Connecticut congressional colleagues, such as Rep. John Larson, are constantly asked by reporters about their working relationship with Lieberman. Larson has known Lieberman for many years and he says that he and his wife are still the same people that he has known for years and they don't treat him differently.

Connecticut House Speaker James Amann (D-Milford) said that Lieberman had decided not to seek reelection in 2012 after publicly endorsing McCain for the GOP top spot but he hasn't talked to Lieberman recently and doesn't actually know his true political intentions.

Lieberman did move from New Haven back to his hometown of Stamford, Connecticut after winning as a petitioning candidate for the U.S. Senate against Democratic nominee Ned Lamont. He lost New Haven in 2006 to the upstart Lamont.

Martin J. Dunleavy is a member of the Democratic National Committee from New Haven. He vigorously campaigned for Lieberman in 2006. Although opposed to the U.S. military invasion of Iraq, Dunleavy respects Lieberman's position on the controversial war because he believes that it's principled. Dunleavy doesn't understand why Lieberman would endorse McCain over the one issue of Iraq. Dunleavy had this to say about Lieberman's endorsement of McCain: ''Other than the war, I don't know what this is about for him. Other than that, I don't know what is going through his head. Call John McCain. He's closer to him than anybody these days.''

The New Republic's Jonathan Chait wrote a scathing critique of Lieberman recently decrying him as a ''faux independent.'' He basically said that Lieberman is a part of the Republican machine. The magazine also criticized his close relationship with Pastor John Hagee. Hagee is head of Christians United for Israel. The country's existence and survival, according to Hagee, is Biblical prophesy and people have to believe this in order to get into heaven. Hagee has condemned gays and Catholics in the past.

Lieberman will speak to Hagee's group next week at its annual ''Night for Israel'' in Washington. The Connecticut Senator also spoke to the group last year.

Lieberman has said that he doesn't agree with everything that Hagee has uttered in the past but he should be judged by the totality of his work. He didn't consult with McCain's campaign staff prior to accepting his invitation to speak in front of Hagee's group.

Senator Lieberman might speak at the Republican National Convention in St.Paul, Minnesota. If he does, he says that he won't personally attack Obama.
More news from: United States»
article:257647:10::0
3 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted Jul 20, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #1
    Joe has never marched to a particular drummer and chooses what issues he sides with Dems and what issues he sides with Reps. He votes and acts according to how he thinks and what he believes is right.

    I disagree with many of his positions but because he doesn't choose to vote according to "party" but instead votes according to what he thinks is right, I have a large amount of respect for him.

    I can see why that type of Independent thinking would confuse some.
  • avatar Posted Jul 20, 2008 by  Dave G. (TruthMan)
    #2
    @ Susan Duclos
    Joe has never marched to a particular drummer and chooses what issues he sides with Dems and what issues he sides with Reps. He votes and acts according to how he thinks and what he believes is right.

    I disagree with many of his positions but because he doesn't choose to vote according to "party" but instead votes according to what he thinks is right, I have a large amount of respect for him.

    I can see why that type of Independent thinking would confuse some.


    I don't agree with him on many issues but I also admire him for being independent. The Party isn't always right whether they be Democrats or Republicans.
  • avatar Posted Jul 20, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #3
    @ Dave G. (TruthMan)
    I don't agree with him on many issues but I also admire him for being independent. The Party isn't always right whether they be Democrats or Republicans.


    I give you an AMEN to that.
  • avatar Posted Jul 20, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #4
    @ Susan Duclos
    I give you an AMEN to that.


    And I second that Amen.
  • avatar Posted Jul 20, 2008 by  Gar Swaffar
    #5
    Joe seems less a part of the New American Aristocracy than nearly every other member of CONgress.
  • avatar Posted Jul 21, 2008 by  Dave G. (TruthMan)
    #6
    @ Gar Swaffar
    Joe seems less a part of the New American Aristocracy than nearly every other member of CONgress.


    Who are the New American Aristocracy?
  • Sadiq Green (Spolitics) Posted Jul 22, 2008 by  Sadiq Green (Spolitics)
    #7
    Joke Lieberman...In my opinion he only became an independent because he has an ax to grind against long time Democrats who supported Lamont(??), after he beat Lieberman in a contentious primary in 2006. I used to admire him, but now I don't see anything genuine about him....Jusy my opinion....He has been good for Connecticut.
  • avatar Posted Jul 22, 2008 by  Dave G. (TruthMan)
    #8
    @ Sadiq Green (Spolitics)
    Joke Lieberman...In my opinion he only became an independent because he has an ax to grind against long time Democrats who supported Lamont(??), after he beat Lieberman in a contentious primary in 2006. I used to admire him, but now I don't see anything genuine about him....Jusy my opinion....He has been good for Connecticut.


    Joe Lieberman had to run as an independent candidate for the Senate in Connecticut because he lost the Democratic senatorial nomination to Ned Lamont. I disagree with him on free trade, immigration, Iraq and FISA renewal just to name a few issues.

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?