at the conference on Global Catastrophic Risks
was the topic of asteroids, with David Morrison who is a NASA senior scientist. He spoke about the threat of a catastrophic asteroid strike and the Spaceguard Survey
It is NASA's responsibility since 1998, to monitor the skies and detect near Earth asteroids that are larger than 1 kilometer in size, which is the size that, if it hit Earth, could end civilization.
Morrison stated that 80 percent of the near Earth asteroids that are 1 kilometer or larger have been identified and that he could assure those gathered at the conference that "We are not going the way of the dinosaurs." He also says the Spaceguard Survey has not turned up any near Earth asteroids as large as the one that is believed to have wiped out the dinosaurs.
Morrison pointed out that asteroid strikes are the only natural hazard that in principle can be completely eliminated. Thanks to the Spaceguard Survey, humanity will likely have decades of warning before an impending collision. Once alerted, missiles could be used to nudge a threatening asteroid so that it misses the earth.
Then again, they are keeping their eye on the 210-330 meter asteroid Apophis
, to which they say there is a 1 in 45,000 chance that it could hit the earth on April 13, 2036 and the next three or four years will allow them to specify the likelihood a little better.
Next up was Arnon Dar who is a Technion
physicist, discussing Gamma Ray Bursts
Gamma-ray bursts (GRB) are sudden, intense flashes of gamma-rays which, for a few blinding seconds, light up in an otherwise fairly dark gamma-ray sky. They are detected at the rate of about once a day, and while they are on, they outshine every other gamma-ray source in the sky, including the sun. GRBs are produced when a gigantic star goes supernova.
Dar highlights the Eta Carinae
, which is 7,500 light years away and points out that it has been unstable, it is 100 times more massive than the sun and 5 million times brighter and then he gives the good news that it's axis is pointed away from the earth.
Lest everyone let their concern dwindle though, Anders Sandberg from the Future of Humanity Institute, states that "some astronomers are worried that we may be looking down the barrel of gamma ray gun when the WR 104 binary
located 8,000 light years away goes supernova."
Next on the agenda for the conference was the topic of comets.
William Napier from the Center for Astrobiology at Cardiff University in Wales spoke on the topic of comets and he states that long-period comets, which are
those coming from the Oort cloud and the Kuiper belt have very different properties and behave differently, and are thought to "constitute around 1 percent of the risk of catastrophic collision."
Napier believes that is underestimating the threat because of Dark Comets, which are comets that do not have bright tails and therefore are harder to detect and he uses the IRAS-Araki-Alcock comet as an example, stating that it was detected "only two weeks before it came within 0.03 astronomical units of the earth (about 230 earth diameters) back in 1983-the closest of any known comet since 1770."
Napier argues that the record of large impact craters suggests that the earth experiences periods of cometary bombardment every 36 million years or so. He attributes the episodes to the sun's periodic passage through galactic plane where contact with molecular clouds dislodges comets from the Oort cloud surrounding the solar system. He believes that the earth is currently in a bombardment episode. "We have comet problem because they are hard to detect which means that we would have months or weeks of warning at most," said Napier.
The topics to be discussed next at the Global Catastrophic Risks conference in Oxford will be pandemics and nuclear war.
From all accounts it seems that for now, human beings are not in imminent danger from outer space.
Then again, outer space is not the only thing these scientists and experts are looking into.
On the last day of the conference, they are expected
to discuss the unintended consequences of new technology, with one example being superintelligent machines that, if handled wrong, might cause the demise of Homo sapiens.
According the director of Oxford's Future of Humanity Institute, which is hosting
the conference, Dr. Nick Bostrom, "Any entity which is radically smarter than human beings would also be very powerful. If we get something wrong, you could imagine the consequences would involve the extinction of the human species."
Another topic being discussed by the CNN article linked above is how some experts believe that in as little as two decades "humans will become more non-biological than biological, capable of uploading our minds onto the Internet, living in various virtual worlds and even avoiding aging and evading death," according to Dr. Ray Kurzweil, who is an inventor and futurist who calculates technology trends using what he calls the law of accelerating returns, a mathematical concept that measures the exponential growth of technological evolution.
Sound like a science fiction movie?
In the 1980s, Kurzweil predicted that a tiny handheld device would be invented early in the 21st century, allowing blind people to read documents from anywhere at anytime; this year, such a device was publicly unveiled. He also anticipated the explosive growth of the Internet in the 1990s.
Other experts agree that humans will merge with machines before the end of this century, according to the CNN article.