The Power of Citizen Journalism
 
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» How do I ...» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»
 

article imageFurther Memory Loss Plagues Investigation into the Talman Inquiry

Posted Jul 18, 2008 by  Sykos Masters in Crime | 6 comments | 176 views
Join our team to voice opinions, share images, get paid to report news and more!
Email Print Share
Subscribe to author

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional
For the second day in a row, a police officer in the Taman inquiry (Winnipeg, MB) is having difficulty recalling events preceding the officer-involved fatal traffic accident in 2005. Thursday's focus was on alcohol consumption by the officer involved.
Sgt. Sean Black took the stand on Thursday, July 18th to answer questions regarding a party that he had hosted at his home on the night of the car crash in 2005. One of the off-duty officers that attended this celebration was Harvey-Zenk, who later that evening rear-ended a car driven by Crystal Taman; she died as a result of her injuries.

The ongoing inquiry into the mismanagement of the initial crash investigation is now concentrating on alcohol consumption on that fateful night. According to CBC reports, Black had difficulty recalling specifics of the night in question. He testified, "I remember being very fixated on trying to get the popcorn maker going." Later answers revealed that he had poor recall for much of the evening.

Black did recall that he put a 750-millilitre bottle of whisky and some Bailey's liqueur on the table, and that the next morning when he was cleaning up, the whisky bottle was empty and some of the Bailey's was gone.

He also testified that when the officers left Branigan's for his house, only one seemed too intoxicated to drive, and it wasn't Harvey-Zenk.


The judge instructed Black to draft and provide a complete measured diagram of his kitchen and living space for the court when he returns to the stand on Monday. Prosecutors hope to use this to establish the possible officer placement and likely scenarios for drink consumption during this party.

On Wednesday, another witness recalled events that were in direct opposition to Black's. This witness, who was a bar waitress at the time, recalled that several of these officers had consumed excessive amounts of alcohol on that evening. She identified on of those patrons as Harvey-Zenk, telling the court that he possibly had eight, or more, beer during his time in the bar.

It's clear that the inquiry is moving from determining specific misconduct with regards to Harvey-Zenk towards holding his superiors, at the time, to account for their subsequent actions.
article:257590:11::0
2 subscribers
Subscribe to this thread
  • avatar Posted Jul 18, 2008 by  Sykos Masters
    #1
    "This is your brain. This is your brain on the witness stand" ... LOL

    Whoever uploaded the pic ... thx tons =D
  • avatar Posted Jul 19, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #2
    Here's something that's always bothered me...the time lapse between the actual incident and the trail or court hearing. I'm not saying that support Sgt. Sean Black's failure to remember these events clearly though.
  • avatar Posted Jul 19, 2008 by  Sykos Masters
    #3
    @ Debra Myers (skyangel)
    Here's something that's always bothered me...the time lapse between the actual incident and the trail or court hearing. I'm not saying that support Sgt. Sean Black's failure to remember these events clearly though.


    Agreed. What's even more disturbing is that Harvey-Zenk (the officer in question) has already served his "sentence" and is, once again, a police officer.

    I guess it took all these years to clear up time in the court, put all the ducks in a row, and "try to forget". The whole direction of the inquiry disgusts me.
  • avatar Posted Jul 19, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #4
    @ Sykos Masters
    The whole direction of the inquiry disgusts me.


    I can see why. When my son went to trial, it was over a year later! That's what I don't get about the court system.
  • avatar Posted Jul 19, 2008 by  Chris V. (cgull)
    #5
    @ Sykos Masters
    Agreed. What's even more disturbing is that Harvey-Zenk (the officer in question) has already served his "sentence" and is, once again, a police officer.

    I guess it took all these years to clear up time in the court, put all the ducks in a row, and "try to forget". The whole direction of the inquiry disgusts me.
    It is sad for the victim's family they can get away with this lapse.
  • avatar Posted Jul 19, 2008 by  Sykos Masters
    #6
    @Sky & Chris.

    It's not just sad, it's unacceptable and dishonest in the extreme. I've been catching a few reports about the involvement of J. Fantino in a number RCMP crises a few years ago and just get more and more outraged that these criminals are supposed to be the "best and brightest" that have accepted the responsibility to "serve and protect". I guess the part the rest of us didn't learn was "serve and protect our own (asses)."

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?