The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     How do I ...»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageScientists: 'Women aged 100 can give birth within the next 30 years'

Posted Jul 18, 2008 by  Chris V. (cgull) in Health | 8 comments | 295 views
Next in Health
Related News
1 more article on this subject:
Jul 29, 2008 - 100-year-old women to give birth - 7 comments
Advertising
Scientists forecast that with improved medical techniques, infertility can be eradicated within the next 30 years, allowing any woman to give birth at any age.
Louise Brown, the first test tube baby, was born 30 years ago. To mark this special anniversary, leading scientists were asked to write a report on what advances they expect in the medical field over the next 30 years.

In the journal Nature, scientists predict that within the next three decades, medical techniques will be perfected and infertility will be eradicated. The new techniques will enable any woman to give birth, even women who are 100 years old.

The techniques are not yet developed, but scientists believe they can create sperm and eggs from skin cells and combine them to form hundreds of embryos. Parents can then choose a "designer" baby and have specific characteristics such as hair color, height, intelligence and disease free genes.

Davor Solter, of the Institute of Biology in Singapore told The Telegraph:
It means every person regardless of age will be able to have children. Newborn children could have children and 100-year-olds could have children. It could easily happen in the next 30 years.

Scientists also predict gestation can take place in an artificial womb and the cost of In vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment is expected to fall.

My question is: Why would scientists want a 100-year-old woman to have a baby? The mother will only die soon afterward and deprive the child of a parent. I love science, but sometimes science can get scary.
article:257588:15::0
3 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted Jul 18, 2008 by  Whitdawg
    #1
    I suppose that maybe in 30 years time, women will have an even longer life expectancy than they enjoy now. But even so, Im pretty much of the same mind as you when you say 'why would the scientists want a 100 year old woman to have a baby and only to die sooner after and deprive the child of a mother'.

    Very interesting.
  • avatar Posted Jul 18, 2008 by  Chris V. (cgull)
    #2
    @ Whitdawg
    I suppose that maybe in 30 years time, women will have an even longer life expectancy than they enjoy now. But even so, Im pretty much of the same mind as you when you say 'why would the scientists want a 100 year old woman to have a baby and only to die sooner after and deprive the child of a mother'.

    Very interesting.
    and scary. A child needs both parents otherwise the TV and the society will be a parent, if that is what they want the child to be.
  • avatar Posted Jul 18, 2008 by  Carolyn E. Price (gohomelaker)
    #3
    What woman, in their right mind, would even want to, at age 100 carry a child and give birth. This is the stupidest (sp? grammar?) thing I, as a woman, have every heard.
  • avatar Posted Jul 18, 2008 by  Whitdawg
    #4
    I guess its like this ...

    ... just because they can (may be able to) do it, doesnt make it right ...?
  • avatar Posted Jul 18, 2008 by  Chris V. (cgull)
    #5
    @ Carolyn E. Price (gohomelaker)
    What woman, in their right mind, would even want to, at age 100 carry a child and give birth. This is the stupidest (sp? grammar?) thing I, as a woman, have every heard.
    There are some out there, recently a 72-year-old woman gave birth to twins, she and her husband wanted a male off-spring.
  • avatar Posted Jul 18, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #6
    Crazy. :-) So if you live long enough you will have a teen when you are over 110? That would be a nightmare.
  • avatar Posted Jul 19, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #7
    @ Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    Crazy. :-) So if you live long enough you will have a teen when you are over 110? That would be a nightmare.


    You're not kidding, Cynthia! Women that are past their normal productive period shouldn't be having children when they are this old. I just don't see them being able to physically carry the child, Give birth to it, or having the capability to emotionally or mentally raise that child.

    Scary? You are right!!!
  • Sylvie Posted Jul 19, 2008 by  Sylvie
    #8
    Just what an overcrowded world needs. along with Viagra, and contraception redefined as abortion. Back to the kitchen, ladies. And get those damned shoes off!

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?