Opinion: Sith Lord Obama and His Civilian National Security Force

Advertising

However, there has been detected an ominous gaffe or a purposeful ad lib from being surrounded by supporters falling all over and prostrating themselves before a man that has accomplished nothing in his life on his own volition either in business or politically. His Illinois public service is nothing but a black hole of either disinformation, misinformation or right out missing information. I, for one, cannot trust a politician whose political record is held in secret or non existent.

Who is this man, Barack? Does anyone know? I'm not talking about the one we all hear and see as he parades himself before the cameras and teleprompters. We know what he is when we see and hear him but, who is he really? And, to add insult to injury, why is it that every time he is caught in a major gaffe or a lie, his web site is expunged and cleared of all damaging evidence?

In his speech which can be viewed here or at his official web site (before it is either edited or deleted), Barack is heard to say the following (among other things):

[...] "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded." [...]

Taken out of context, the Worry Alarms begin to wail. However, taken in context, the Worry Alarms cannot be heard or detected due to the Tornado Klaxons across the nation are wailing. The quote above can be heard at time stamp 16:35 and 17:10, approximately a little over half way through the video. In case one doesn't want to view the video, the audio capture can be heard here.

The portent of his words emphasized as they are in the video but cannot be found in his prepared speech, is not only ominous but frighteningly spooky. To fully understand the verbiage of what has become known as the beginning of The Obama Youth Brigades, one must fully view the nearly 24 minute video (if it hasn't been edited yet). In conjunction with that, one must at least try and understand what he means exactly by his mantra of Hope and Change that not one single person has been able to viably explain to its fullest intent.

Barack has also been heard to say in this same video the following:

"Loving your country shouldn't just mean fireworks on the 4th of July. Loving your country must mean accepting your responsibility to do your part to change it. If you do, your life will be richer, our country will be stronger."

That sounds pretty and noble. However, parsing the verbiage along with studying the body language including the tonal inflections - self emphasis of certain phrases - one discovers even more ominous and potentially threatening overtures. Where has the world heard these words of "your life will be richer, our country will be stronger" before? The intent and the verbiage, to the historian, sounds familiar.

Think back to the Hitler Youth and the Brown Shirts. Think back to the Black Shirts of the avant-garde of Italy's Mussolini. Think back to the now defunct USSR and the Red Chinese. They all spoke of the same ideology of "your life will be richer, our country will be stronger" and utilized the impressionable and indoctrinated youth of their society and time.

What are the changes that Barack hopes to make for and to the United States? How is he going to finance these grand schemes and noble plans that dreams are made of...and nightmares? What became of such governments and tyrannical and dictatorial regimes that espoused such changes and decrying "your life will be richer, our country will be stronger"? By whose estimations will our lives be richer and our country stronger? History reminds us and tells us that such regimes, in the end, failed and fell hard never to re-emerge from the quagmire, self-induced, of such magnitude that it is a wonder that one would even think of re-inventing that ugliness.

Think about the alleged "radical Islam" proponents that run to and fro reeking havoc among the population terrorizing the people and demanding devotion and loyalty...or else. What would Barack's Civilian National Security Forces be utilized for and what would their mission be? What are his plans for the nations' police forces? What are his plans for the FBI? Aren't the law enforcement agencies of this nation responsible for National Security on the Homefront? Why is Barack opining and announcing plans for a Civilian National Security Force? To what end?

So many questions and to date, not one single answer. World Net Daily has been frantically trying to ascertain answers or at least clarifications of Barack's uncanny comments. So eerie this is indeed. Barack's campaign has scrubbed these comments from the prepared speech and these same comments cannot be found on his web site either. Why is that? His web site does mention developing a Homeland Security Force but, as usual, the blandness and vagaries are ominously usual.

As Nazi Germany's Hitler used the Brown Shirts and the Hitler Youth as his personal guard, eyes and ears; as Mussolini did the same with his Black Shirts and the USSR did the same with the KGB, is this what Barack has planned? The answer might lie within his own uttered words and yes, Barack, words do mean something.

In his speech he said that he was going to increase the military by approx 65,000 Soldiers and 27,000 Marines. In the same breath or nearly so, he mentions an increase of 75,000 AmeriCorps workers to 250,000 and doubling the size of the Peace Corps of which, they will be on an equal par with the United States Armed Forces. Here is the quote once more:

[...] "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded." [...]

The "relying only on our military" comment needs to be explained. And, having a civilian security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded" needs to be explained. The United States Armed Forces have a budget of $500 Billion with a population of nearly 3 Million. Barack's proposal will have an additional 92,000 Troops in conjunction with nearly 500 Thousand civilian national security forces of which will be just as strong, powerful and funded. Where is he going with this? Is his 500 thousand strong civilian national security force going to be on a budget of $500 Billion? "Just as well funded" sounds like it to me.

In recent times, we have heard the members of the Leftinistra say that our military is already too big yet he wants to increase its size. In recent times, we have heard the Leftinistra say that the government is tool big yet Barack wants to have the largest Federal Employee Payroll in the history of this nation.

This could also lead to the largest voter base for the government hand-out recipients ever conceived - purchased votes as it were by awarding a government job to a loyal subject. In his speech he invoked the names of FDR, John F Kennedy and Martin Luther King, two of which he doesn't even come close to being molded after, especially Martin Luther King because he was a registered Republican. JFK was the last Conservative Democrat. FDR on the other hand was a socialist that knew the powers of persuasion and threats to stay in power...he served 31/2 terms as President. Do recall that FDR wanted to stack the court and eventually did to get his New Deal (Raw Deal) into place.

No. Barack Hussein Obama has some explaining to do and we shall not cease and desist until we have answers.