The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     How do I ...»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageRep. Charles Rangel Solicits Money Using Government Stationery

Posted Jul 16, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel) in Politics | 25 comments | 492 views
Next in Politics
Related News
Advertising
House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles Rangel is back in the news again, after it was discovered that he has been soliciting donations from businesses who have interests before the committee, for a new academic center which will bear his name.
Earlier this month, Rep. Charles Rangel made the news for having four rent stabilized apartments in Lenox Terrace, a luxury development in Harlem as Sadiq Green (Spolitics) reported. One of these was used for Rangel's campaign office.

It's since come to light that Rangel has been soliciting donations for the building of the Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service at the City College of New York. This same project won a $1.9 million congressional earmark that had created controversy last year. Certain critics have called Rangel's pet project a "Monument to Me".

The thing that has heads turned in his direction is that he's been using his office letterhead to solicit these funds, which is barred by congressional rules. Letters that have used this same stationary have gone out to business leaders the likes of Donald Trump and Hank Greenburg (both open as a pdf), who is a former head of AIG, the insurance and financial services giant.

Rangel, the New York Democrat, has raised grants totaling $690,500 from the Department of Housing and Urban Development toward the renovation of the college-owned Harlem brownstone that will house the center. So far, Rangel has helped to raise around $12 million toward the $30 million goal.

In the letter to Donald Trump, Rep. Charles Rangel wrote,
"It is a personal dream of mine to see this Center at City College, which resides in my congressional district and where so many talented young men and women from the community have gotten an excellent education."


Government watchdogs and experts in ethics both feel that it's "troubling" that a man with the status of Rangel would solicit funds from businesses which have interests in front of his committee. This committee has a broad jurisdiction over tax policy, trade, Social Security and Medicare. Many feel that that he has crossed the line and are afraid that Rangel could channel public money to this project instead of more worthy causes.

F. Christopher Arterton, dean of George Washington University's Graduate School of Political Management, said,
"Charlie Rangel is a prominent public servant and may deserve a center at City College. . . . But I think one has to be careful about how one raises the money for that. The danger is that it begins to blur the lines between whether a quid pro quo is implied by this or not."


Rangel's response was,
"In the 38 years that I've been down here, I don't think there has ever been any challenge, real or unreal, to my integrity as it relates to fundraising," he said. He added: "If it was an ethical problem, I wouldn't do it.


Rangel has also stated that he would still raise money for this project even though it did not bear his name, because he believes in its mission of promoting racial diversity in public administration leadership.

The government watchdog group, the Center for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, said yesterday that it will file an ethics complaint alleging that Rangel's use of the congressional letterhead violated the rules. The rules state:
"No letterhead or envelope used in a solicitation may bear the words 'Congress of the United States,' 'House of Representatives' or 'Official Business,' nor may the letterhead or envelope bear the Seal of the United States, the Congress, or the House."


Rangel told the New York Post yesterday that these rules have left him unsure of what is allowed, saying that,
"The laws have been so vague in what we can solicit for not-for-profits that I am certain that they're making them up as we go along."


Update:

Rep. Charles Rangel has called upon the House ethics committee to investigate his method of fund raising. During a press conference this morning, Rangel went after the Washington Post for having reported that he'd sent out letters on official stationary trying to solicit money for the center that is to bear his name. As well, he asked reporters to "attack" the Washington Post and Christopher Lee, who wrote the article.

"The review should be done as soon as possible so as to clear up any misunderstandings regarding my efforts to convene meeting to discuss partnerships between educational institutions and the private sector," Rangel said in a statement released at the press conference.

"I believe the review will show there have been no violations of the [House ethics] rules."


Rangel still believes that he has not violated any rules.

Within this article is an update, stating that Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-California) has stated that she supports Rangel's request for the investigation.
More news from: United States»
article:257490:22::0
3 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted Jul 16, 2008 by  Sue D.
    #1
    Excellent piece, so well written!!!! Rangel needs to keep his name off the front pages for a while. Jeez
  • avatar Posted Jul 16, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #2
    Shheeeesh, go figure, you know?
  • avatar Posted Jul 16, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #3
    Thank you, Sue for the lead on this one!

    This guy is only added fuel to the already HOT Democratic fires burning!
  • avatar Posted Jul 16, 2008 by  Sue D.
    #4
    @ Debra Myers (skyangel)
    Thank you, Sue for the lead on this one!

    This guy is only added fuel to the already HOT Democratic fires burning!


    My pleasure. Chris reminded me you were in NY, which gives you a more personal and better understanding of it all
  • avatar Posted Jul 16, 2008 by  Gar Swaffar
    #5
    he said. He added: "If it was an ethical problem, I wouldn't do it.


    Perghaps Charlie could define the word "problem" for us?
    And does that definition include the words "oops, I got caught" in it?
    Still sleazy after all these years.
  • avatar Posted Jul 16, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #6
    @ Sue D.
    My pleasure. Chris reminded me you were in NY, which gives you a more personal and better understanding of it all


    Indeed! Although I'm still 7+ hours removed from NYC...we still hear things up here!

    @ Gar Swaffar
    Perghaps Charlie could define the word "problem" for us?
    And does that definition include the words "oops, I got caught" in it?
    Still sleazy after all these years.


    Yes he is a sleeze...using his status to get away with things! That has changed now though...
  • redhawk Posted Jul 16, 2008 by  redhawk
    #7
    Good Piece.. The Corruption Syndrome sweems to surface just before every election and now that the Majority is being found to be as bad as the tyopical Royalist Politician in Congress here we go":
    Rangel... Improper behaviour on "funny " rental properties.. Illegal solicitation Practices.. Needs a Congressional Investigation

    Dodd and Conrad.. Lower than Whale crap Loans from the defunct and Corrupt home loan Company.. Abuse of power? Need Congressional investigation ! .. hear that Waxman?

    Dodd and Schumer Pushing for Loans by lending Institutions to home buyers who actually were Unemployed helping to create in part the Mess that Freddy and Fannie are in in addition to the lack of Oversight from the Dem Led Congress on these two Lobbyist led institutions ( hear that Barry) .. Both need to be investigated for Corruption .. Go Waxman you have job security .. investigate them all along with Freezer Boy Johnson and Family!!!

    9% ratings Indeed!!! IMPEACH THESE CROOKS!!! Right Pelosi?
  • avatar Posted Jul 16, 2008 by  Nikki W (karateblossom)
    #8
    Good girl! See and you though you weren't missed??????? Whatever. Shiesty people in politics...and this crap equals bad news.
  • sumdume Posted Jul 16, 2008 by  sumdume
    #9
    I reckon that Charley was not one of those who had "
    gotten an excellent education.


    His ethical lapses and difficulty comprehending the english language indicate that he didn't learn much or has forgotten a lot of what he was taught.
  • avatar Posted Jul 17, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #10
    @ redhawk
    Good Piece.. The Corruption Syndrome sweems to surface just before every election and now that the Majority is being found to be as bad as the tyopical Royalist Politician in Congress here we go":
    Rangel... Improper behaviour on "funny " rental properties.. Illegal solicitation Practices.. Needs a Congressional Investigation

    Dodd and Conrad.. Lower than Whale crap Loans from the defunct and Corrupt home loan Company.. Abuse of power? Need Congressional investigation ! .. hear that Waxman?

    Dodd and Schumer Pushing for Loans by lending Institutions to home buyers who actually were Unemployed helping to create in part the Mess that Freddy and Fannie are in in addition to the lack of Oversight from the Dem Led Congress on these two Lobbyist led institutions ( hear that Barry) .. Both need to be investigated for Corruption .. Go Waxman you have job security .. investigate them all along with Freezer Boy Johnson and Family!!!

    9% ratings Indeed!!! IMPEACH THESE CROOKS!!! Right Pelosi?


    Thanks, redhawk! I agree...something DOES need to be done about these jerks in power who use their status to get away with doing stuff...because they can.

    @ Nikki W (karateblossom)
    Good girl! See and you though you weren't missed??????? Whatever. Shiesty people in politics...and this crap equals bad news.


    You know I was picking, Nikki! LOL!

    This is only goes to show that there are more than just a few that are Shysters!!!
  • avatar Posted Jul 17, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #11
    @ sumdume
    I reckon that Charley was not one of those who had "His ethical lapses and difficulty comprehending the english language indicate that he didn't learn much or has forgotten a lot of what he was taught.


    Not to mention the fact that he's trying to lay the blame on laws that are made "up as we go along."
  • redhawk Posted Jul 17, 2008 by  redhawk
    #12
    Is Charley definition of " problem" the fact that by doing nothing other than investigations over dead issues while omitting to look into the Democrat Culture of Corruption and Ineptness , and Overseeing their own rather " shady" activities what he actually means... I wonder.
  • avatar Posted Jul 17, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #13
    @ redhawk
    Is Charley definition of " problem" the fact that by doing nothing other than investigations over dead issues while omitting to look into the Democrat Culture of Corruption and Ineptness , and Overseeing their own rather " shady" activities what he actually means... I wonder.


    Definitely points to ponder, redhawk.
  • avatar Posted Jul 17, 2008 by  Sue D.
    #14
    @ sumdume
    I reckon that Charley was not one of those who had "His ethical lapses and difficulty comprehending the english language indicate that he didn't learn much or has forgotten a lot of what he was taught.


    Nicely put.

    Great comment thread Debra.
  • redhawk Posted Jul 17, 2008 by  redhawk
    #15
    @ Sue D.
    Nicely put.

    Great comment thread Debra.

    It seems that many of the new Congressional "leadership" are beginning to be Discovered as what they really are.. proving that Crap flows down from the Summit...
  • redhawk Posted Jul 17, 2008 by  redhawk
    #16
    @ sumdume
    I reckon that Charley was not one of those who had "His ethical lapses and difficulty comprehending the english language indicate that he didn't learn much or has forgotten a lot of what he was taught.

    Unfortunately his Educatrion came by long yeras of Congressional Corrupted Experience... what can he know of Honesty and Ethics with such along Background???
  • avatar Posted Jul 17, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #17
    @ Sue D.
    Nicely put.

    Great comment thread Debra.


    Thanks, Sue. Definitely some good points and thoughts!
    @ redhawk
    It seems that many of the new Congressional "leadership" are beginning to be Discovered as what they really are.. proving that Crap flows down from the Summit...


    @ redhawk
    Unfortunately his Educatrion came by long yeras of Congressional Corrupted Experience... what can he know of Honesty and Ethics with such along Background???


    Isn't that the truth!
  • redhawk Posted Jul 17, 2008 by  redhawk
    #18
    @ Debra Myers (skyangel)
    Thanks, Sue. Definitely some good points and thoughts!
    Isn't that the truth!

    Thanks Debra.. It seems that the Dems never cease to find ways to LOSE!
  • avatar Posted Jul 17, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #19
    @ redhawk
    Thanks Debra.. It seems that the Dems never cease to find ways to LOSE!


    But they keep doing this "losing" with astounding frequency.
  • avatar Posted Jul 17, 2008 by  Sue D.
    #20
    I hope the investigation is thorough.
  • avatar Posted Jul 17, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #21
    @ Sue D.
    I hope the investigation is thorough.


    It needs to be...because I think he's just trying to throw a smoke screen because he's been caught.
  • redhawk Posted Jul 17, 2008 by  redhawk
    #22
    @ Debra Myers (skyangel)
    It needs to be...because I think he's just trying to throw a smoke screen because he's been caught.

    Fuuny thgings about Libbo Loons.. They are unable to cat as Adults and take their medicine like GOP crooks have done .. IE Leave the office... They rather Blame the system, someone else but always, always act as a bunch of immature creatures in Diapers....
  • redhawk Posted Jul 17, 2008 by  redhawk
    #23
    @ Debra Myers (skyangel)
    But they keep doing this "losing" with astounding frequency.

    Agree .. Now that is ONE thing that they are good at... anything else they fail miserably.
  • avatar Posted Jul 17, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #24
    @ redhawk
    Agree .. Now that is ONE thing that they are good at... anything else they fail miserably.


    Other examples being NObama and Shillery!
  • redhawk Posted Jul 21, 2008 by  redhawk
    #25
    @ Debra Myers (skyangel)
    Other examples being NObama and Shillery!

    Ed Zachery so... But what will they say or do when Phat Alphonse the Bore Gore might just GUM up a Denver attempt to a coronation...

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?