The Power of Citizen Journalism
 
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» How do I ...» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»
 

article imageOpinion: To Make Sure Teens Don't Understand Safe Sex, Take Them to Texas For Schooling

Posted Jul 15, 2008 by  KJ (momentsintime) in Education | 9 comments | 348 views
Join our team to voice opinions, share images, get paid to report news and more!
Email Print Share
Subscribe to author

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional
1 more article on this subject:
Students in Texas don't learn the facts of life like others across the United States instead they are taught to 'just say no' and to heck with life saving lessons on 'safe sex.' After all if everyone is a virgin when they get married who needs a condom.
The teaching of abstinence in sex education since 1995 didn't bring about any of the state's objectives. Instead of decreasing the number of teen pregnancies by 2003 the state saw higher numbers than states that did teach their teens birth control. Gonorrhea was double the national average in the same year in Lubbock County.

In 1995 then governor George Bush signed the law mandating abstinence-only education in the state of Texas.

By 2004 the State had spent more than $10 million dollars on the program that stays away from discussion on other ways to avoid teenage pregnancy or halting the spread of HIV. The program in 2004 had failed miserably. Ranked in the bottom four states of teen births (15-17 year-old mothers). Still the state went forth teaching a program that is shunned by The American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Public Health Association, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

The CDC in 2004 said of the program: “The effect was very chilling.”

The tide had not turned in 2005 according to a state-sponsored study by Texas A&M University researchers. The study revealed that instead of slowing down students in all high school grades were more sexually active after undergoing abstinence education.


"We didn't find what many would like for us to find," said A&M researcher Buzz Pruitt, who met with state health authorities last week to discuss the data.


The program is designed to:

* decrease the pregnancy rate among teens.
* reduce the proportion of adolescents engaged in sex.
* reduce the incidence of STDs in adolescents.
* increase the number of youth and adults served through abstinence education.


It's now 2008. This year Texas spent $17 million to teach their teens to remain virgins. This year according to federal statistics 52.9 percent of Texas students from grades 9 to 12 had sexual intercourse compared to the national average of 47.8. Those children who disregarded their lessons also failed to use a condom more often than those taught about safe sex in school.

In Texas a school has the option of teaching abstinence or nothing at all. That will not be changing in the near future.

"The governor is comfortable with the current law and supports abstinence programs," said Allison Castle, a spokeswoman for Gov. Rick Perry.


When the bill was written during George Bush's watch as governor it was not meant to eliminate comprehensive sex education in schools, rather offer up an alternative approach to teenagers.

"I think the interpretation has morphed into abstinence-only, which is not our policy," Democrat Garnet Coleman of Houston said. "If I could fix anything, it'd be to make the law more instructive to say, 'This is what you can teach"' about contraceptives.


In California a teacher can show their students the proper way to use a condom using a banana as a visual tool. In Texas a student has to learn about condoms either from their parents or from their friends but not in a school.

How much more funding will be shoveled down the drain in Texas for a program that doesn't work is anyone's guess. What is safe to say is the students in the state do not heed the lessons. In the end, the state pays a much higher cost than funding a program that doesn't work. It also gets to fund more programs for teen mothers who didn't learn that birth control can also to a way to avoid pregnancy when they have sex.
article:257445:9::0
3 subscribers
Subscribe to this thread
  • avatar Posted Jul 15, 2008 by  Sykos Masters
    #1
    Another great find KJ :)

    What ever happened to "Just don't jump on anything with a pulse"? The state of "sex education" in the States is alarming. You'd think that someone with a brain would have realized this by now.
  • avatar Posted Jul 15, 2008 by  KJ (momentsintime)
    #2
    @ Sykos Masters
    Another great find KJ :)

    What ever happened to "Just don't jump on anything with a pulse"? The state of "sex education" in the States is alarming. You'd think that someone with a brain would have realized this by now.


    Most of the States have a good program for sex education. Texas alas is not one of them. Each state is responsible for the curriculum. Texas believes that phrase "Just don't jump on anything with a pulse" when it comes to teens, or more so just don`t jump at all. Hiding knowledge away though as proven with time is not proactive.

    My personal stance for the boys is if you can`t pay for everything that comes with being a father wrap it in shrink wrap or whatever until you can. Doesn`t mean that they will listen but they know I ain`t gonna be birthin no babies or rearing them. Been there, done that and all that jazz.
  • avatar Posted Jul 15, 2008 by  Sykos Masters
    #3
    lol .... "But Miss Scarlett, I don't know nuthin' 'bout birthin' babies!!!"
  • avatar Posted Jul 15, 2008 by  KJ (momentsintime)
    #4
    @ Sykos Masters
    lol .... "But Miss Scarlett, I don't know nuthin' 'bout birthin' babies!!!"[/quote


    Exactly! Seriously I think honest discussion with kids about all of the facts is much more proactive than shielding them.
  • avatar Posted Jul 15, 2008 by  Whitdawg
    #5
    Wouldnt it just be a lot easier if all the states had the same curriculum on specific subjects like this, if not all subjects ?
    Definately agree with KJ though, we did that with our kids (now 16 and 13) and no pregnancies/stds/etc so far.
  • avatar Posted Jul 15, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #6
    I too did the honesty thing with my own children, and all were adults when they had their first children. When sheltered, children (IMO) get the it-won't-happen-to-me attitude. Ask me...I know! LOL!
  • avatar Posted Jul 15, 2008 by  Whitdawg
    #7
    @ Whitdawg
    Wouldnt it just be a lot easier if all the states had the same curriculum on specific subjects like this, if not all subjects ?
    Definately agree with KJ though, we did that with our kids (now 16 and 13) and no pregnancies/stds/etc so far.


    That reads really bad that I might expect them to be having underage sex, which Im not !
  • avatar Posted Jul 15, 2008 by  Whitdawg
    #8
    @ Debra Myers (skyangel)
    I too did the honesty thing with my own children, and all were adults when they had their first children. When sheltered, children (IMO) get the it-won't-happen-to-me attitude. Ask me...I know! LOL!


    lol
  • avatar Posted Jul 17, 2008 by  ImpTeaser
    #9
    Hmmm, teens don't stay teens forever...
    Sounds like I need to move to Texas & have me some fun.
    Yeeeeeeeeeeeha- . . .( I got WHAT?????-)
    . . . awwwwwwwwww, shucks, now I'm no good to ANYbody.
    DANG!!!

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?