The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     How do I ...»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageJesse Jackson Apologizes For Remarks Directed Against Barack Obama

Posted Jul 9, 2008 by  Sue D. in Politics | 23 comments | 981 views
Next in Politics
Related News
1 more article on this subject:
Advertising
Jesse Jackson made remarks criticizing Barack Obama when he thought his microphone was off and apologizes for his remarks before they are aired on a Fox Channel.
[Update] Video above added.

Jesse Jackson is a former presidential candidate from 1984 and a well known civil rights activist.

Recently he made remarks, not knowing that the microphone in front of him was on, that were critical of Barack Obama.

When reports came out that his remarks were caught and would be shown on the Fox News program Hannity and Colmes, he issued a preemptive apology for those remarks which Jackson calls "crude and hurtful" comments toward the presumptive Democratic nominee, Barack Obama.

According to Jackson, Fox News microphones picked up the remarks that were meant to be delivered privately, which criticized Barack Obama for lecturing the black community on morality.

Jackson's apology did not specify what was said in the soon to be shown remarks but he does say that he was trying to explain that Obama was hurting his relationship with black voters by recently conducting "moral" lectures at African-American churches.

CNN reports that Jesse Jackson, who is endorsing Barack Obama is "very distressed" over the comments.

Jackson says, "This is a sound bite in a broader conversation about urban policy and racial disparities. I feel very distressed because I'm supportive of this campaign and with the senator, what he has done and is doing. I said he comes down as speaking down to black people. The moral message must be a much broader message. What we need really is racial justice and urban policy and jobs and health care. That's a range of issues on the menu.

"Then I said something I regret was crude. It was very private. And very much a sound bite.


Jackson's public apology is told to CNN where he says, "For any harm or hurt that this hot mic private conversation may have caused, I apologize. My support for Senator Obama’s campaign is wide, deep and unequivocal. I cherish this redemptive and historical moment."

What Jackson was referring to was a speech Barack Obama gave speaking about black fathers being more engaged in raising their children. He gave this speech at the Apostolic Church of God on Chicago's South Side where he was highly critical of absent black fathers that are absent in raising their children. .

According to the Drudge Report it says that Jackson's remarks were an appeal for "for the moral content of his message to not only deal with the personal and moral responsibility of black males, but to deal with the collective moral responsibility of government and the public policy which would be a corrective action for the lack of good choices that often led to their irresponsibility. "

That was the context of my private conversation and it does not reflect any disparagement on my part for the historic event in which we are involved or my pride in Senator Barack Obama, who is leading it, whom I have supported by crisscrossing this nation in every level of media and audience from the beginning in absolute terms.


The bottom line here is that people should be aware of whether a microphone is on or off before speaking for all the world to hear because the statements made could end up on new coverage stories across the country, indeed, the world.
article:257206:19::0
5 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • sumdume Posted Jul 9, 2008 by  sumdume
    #1
    Well.... what did he say that was misinterpreted?
  • avatar Posted Jul 9, 2008 by  Sue D.
    #2
    @ sumdume
    Well.... what did he say that was misinterpreted?


    it wasn't misinterpreted. He criticized Obama for his comments about Black fathers and he apologized because it was heard on the open mike when it was supposed to be a private comment.

    In other words, he feels it is ok to criticize Obama but NOT for the general public to hear those criticisms.... how is that for hypocrisy?


    Night everyone.
  • avatar Posted Jul 9, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #3
    @ Sue D.
    it wasn't misinterpreted. He criticized Obama for his comments about Black fathers and he apologized because it was heard on the open mike when it was supposed to be a private comment.

    In other words, he feels it is ok to criticize Obama but NOT for the general public to hear those criticisms.... how is that for hypocrisy?


    Night everyone.


    How is that? Typical Jesse Jackson, that's how that is.
  • avatar Posted Jul 9, 2008 by  Sue D.
    #4
    From Bucks Right:

    Hannity also intimated that Jackson says he wants to “rip Obama’s nuts off” on the tape. Hannity would not say “nuts,” but based on his description (portion of the male anatomy beginning with an “n”) I believe that’s the word he was going for.

    Hannity says the tape will be played in its entirety on tonight’s Hannity and Colmes. Other sources indicate it will also air on The O’Reilly Factor. Hannity may have been mistaken about the tape airing “in its entirety” this evening, as it is reported to be so crude that it will require extensive editing.

    O’Reilly is quoted as saying that FOX held back more damaging portions of the tape that were not relevant to the conversation. Guess we’ll have to wait and see if Hannity plays the entire tape during his radio show at 3PM ET Thursday.


    Drudge reports that Jackson said: "Cut his nuts out."

    Not good.
  • avatar Posted Jul 9, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #5
    NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnope
  • avatar Posted Jul 9, 2008 by  Sue D.
    #6
    A portion of the video added to the article.
  • avatar Posted Jul 10, 2008 by  Julybug
    #7
    woops! hate when that happens!! I've had the wrong people overhear things I was saying in private to someone else and that sucks for anyone.
  • avatar Posted Jul 10, 2008 by  Chris Hogg
    #8
    What an idiot. Who would ever say anything like this while mic'ed at a TV station?
  • avatar Posted Jul 10, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #9
    He should have had the sense to watch what he said when he was sitting in front of a mike.
    He was whispering for crying out loud! Did he think if he whispered that he wouldn't be heard?
  • avatar Posted Jul 10, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #10
    @ Chris Hogg
    What an idiot. Who would ever say anything like this while mic'ed at a TV station?


    I was going to call him a jerk so if Chris can call him an idiot then I can add jerk to that. :)
  • avatar Posted Jul 10, 2008 by  Sue D.
    #11
    @ Chris Hogg
    What an idiot. Who would ever say anything like this while mic'ed at a TV station?


    ummmmmm, Jesse Jackson? (cheeeeky grin)



    @ Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    I was going to call him a jerk so if Chris can call him an idiot then I can add jerk to that. :)


    ROFL.

    This also brings up another point. No matter what Jackson says out loud, we all now know what he truly thinks about Obama and yet he is "gung ho" publicly for the Obama campaign?

    How many others are there like Jackson?
  • avatar Posted Jul 10, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #12
    @ Sue D.
    No matter what Jackson says out loud, we all now know what he truly thinks about Obama and yet he is "gung ho" publicly for the Obama campaign?

    How many others are there like Jackson?


    to me, this says that Jackson is an all-in-all back-biter. With him around, Obama doesn't need any enemies!!!
  • avatar Posted Jul 10, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #13
    @ Debra Myers (skyangel)
    to me, this says that Jackson is an all-in-all back-biter. With him around, Obama doesn't need any enemies!!!


    Seems like Obama has associated with some others that have turned out to be more of an enemy than a friend.
  • avatar Posted Jul 10, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #14
    @ Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    Seems like Obama has associated with some others that have turned out to be more of an enemy than a friend.


    And it doesn't get any better either.
  • Hammster Posted Jul 11, 2008 by  Hammster
    #15
    I keep praying that GOD will change the hearts (minds, world view) of leadership in this country, and that He'll let EVERYONE see them for what they are.

    So far so good - Thank You LORD GOD.
  • avatar Posted Jul 11, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence
    #16
    Here is my issue with it. He is pissed that Barack Obama was addressing a serious issue in the black community, and saying people need held accountable. Jesse Jackson feeds off of the victim mentality he has fostered in the black community for years.

    He wants to cut Barack's nuts out because Obama wants the black community to get past that and work on thier family relationships. Thus Jesse Jackson slips away in fame and makes no more money off the culture of victimization.
  • avatar Posted Jul 11, 2008 by  Bocephalus
    #17
    Fox and journalistic integrity are mutually exclusive. For more, consult above article and follow the trail of deception back all the way to Rupert Murdoch's false teeth. Keeping the mic on during the break and then airing private conversations is low and unprofessional.
  • avatar Posted Jul 11, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #18
    @ Samantha A. Torrence
    Here is my issue with it. He is pissed that Barack Obama was addressing a serious issue in the black community, and saying people need held accountable. Jesse Jackson feeds off of the victim mentality he has fostered in the black community for years.

    He wants to cut Barack's nuts out because Obama wants the black community to get past that and work on thier family relationships. Thus Jesse Jackson slips away in fame and makes no more money off the culture of victimization.


    This makes sense Sam. It seems like some of the issues that Obama is trying to address he has those who it seems should support him that are tearing him down.
  • avatar Posted Jul 11, 2008 by  Chris Hogg
    #19
    @ Bocephalus
    Keeping the mic on during the break and then airing private conversations is low and unprofessional.

    You think so? Why isn't it important for the public to know about Jackson's feelings about Obama? I think it's incredibly newsworthy and very important.
  • avatar Posted Jul 11, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #20
    @ Bocephalus
    Fox and journalistic integrity are mutually exclusive. For more, consult above article and follow the trail of deception back all the way to Rupert Murdoch's false teeth. Keeping the mic on during the break and then airing private conversations is low and unprofessional.


    Jackson should have realized that his conversation might be heard. Which I think he did as he was whispering.

    It shows the lack of integrity on the part of Jackson to even say that when Obama was trying to tell black fathers they need to take responsibility for their actions.
  • avatar Posted Jul 11, 2008 by  Sue D.
    #21
    @ Chris Hogg
    You think so? Why isn't it important for the public to know about Jackson's feelings about Obama? I think it's incredibly newsworthy and very important.


    Thanks Chris and I also think that the very fact that Jackson was whispering made it pretty clear that he understood he could be overheard.

    Anyone who has done as many interviews as Jackson has done should know better than to say anything while a mic is on them.

    The Washington Post also reports that Jackson's remarks have "revived" concerns among other African American political activists.

    Something else has been reported about other comments that Jackson made at that time which Fox hasn't released the video of.....yet.

    Fox News says it was not seeking to embarrass Jackson or else it would have used allegedly far worse comments about Obama also caught on that tape.


    Any bets on how long it will be before we get a glimpse of those other comments that didn't pertain to "policy", are released?
  • avatar Posted Jul 18, 2008 by  Bocephalus
    #22
    @ Chris Hogg
    You think so? Why isn't it important for the public to know about Jackson's feelings about Obama? I think it's incredibly newsworthy and very important.


    Sure it's newsworthy but does the end justify the means? If they strung him up from his legs and put a large flame to his head would that be ok by you also so long as the words from his mouth were interesting?
    You don't invite someone over for an interview then secretly tape them in the midst of a private conversation and air it for the world at large, that's unprofessional and I expect nothing less from Fox..
  • avatar Posted Jul 18, 2008 by  Sue D.
    #23
    @ Bocephalus
    Sure it's newsworthy but does the end justify the means? If they strung him up from his legs and put a large flame to his head would that be ok by you also so long as the words from his mouth were interesting?
    You don't invite someone over for an interview then secretly tape them in the midst of a private conversation and air it for the world at large, that's unprofessional and I expect nothing less from Fox..


    Actually anyone who has ever been interviewed on television will tell you that the recorder NEVER stops running while the microphone is attach, which Jesse Jackson is very well aware of, hence no "secret" taping.

    Only a moron speaks privately knowing they are being recorded.

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?