The Power of Citizen Journalism
 
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» How do I ...» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»
 

article imageWal-Mart broke Minnesota labor law 2 million times over six years

Posted Jul 4, 2008 by  Chris V. (cgull) in Business | 6 comments | 287 views
Join our team to voice opinions, share images, get paid to report news and more!
Email Print Share
Subscribe to author

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

WalMart-The High Cost of Low Price - Documentary
A Minnesota District Judge ruled that Wal-Mart broke Minnesota labor laws more than 2 million times, causing infractions like making employees work through lunch and rest breaks.
The lawsuit was filed in 2001 but the ruling was given only this week. The jury will decide what kind of penalty should be assigned to each violation, and it could range as high $1,000 per violation. The second phase of the trial is expected to begin October 20.

Nancy Braun, 53, one of four named plaintiffs on the suit, told the court how poorly she was treated during her 14 months of work at Wal-Mart. She was the sole cook and waitress at the store’s grill. They didn’t give her any replacement when she had to take lunch or bathroom breaks. They made her work through out the day non-stop repeatedly.

She told Star Tribune that many times there was no replacement for her to go to the bathroom: "I would end up soiling myself…Sometimes I'd have other clothes with me in my locker, or they would say to me, 'We have clothes in the store you can buy.'"

Braun said she complained several times to the management but no help came.

The District Judge Robert King in a ruling Monday in Hastings cited Braun’s treatment and another episode with a menstruating employee and called it “dehumanizing and reprehensible” acts.

Wal-Mart is planning to appeal, according to company spokeswoman Daphne Moore. They are pleased with the court’s ruling on many points but on others they don’t agree with it.

For more about Wal-Mart labor practices, watch this mini documentary in this article and for the full movie click this Google video.
article:256949:10::0
3 subscribers
Subscribe to this thread
  • avatar Posted Jul 4, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #1
    I hope that they have to pay and pay big.
    The trouble is they have the money to keep going because so many do shop there.
    I very seldom go to WalMart because I don't like their practices and what they do.
    I prefer to shop elsewhere even though it might cost a little more.
  • Hammster Posted Jul 4, 2008 by  Hammster
    #2
    WallMart does a lot of good (fair market price is a relative term), but my family in N.C. had a tough time working for them.

    My mom (age 62 at the time) was expected to work 12 hour days (she stayed there about 2 months).

    My nephew (age 32) is a licensed option, he'd worked at a couple of WM's optical shops and said the quality of the good was to standard, but again long hours with no help.

    Retail is a different world (with an education all its' own from dealing with the public t unrealistic expectations for sales by the owner).

    I don't want to see WM go, and perhaps after the court gets done with them they'll be the better for it. My chief criticism of the company is how they will build a big store, stay in it 5 or 6 years then build a bigger store to move into, leaving small shop owners in the old center with a empty behemoth next them (Duluth - GA has two shopping centers this way).

    Happy Forth to all - GOD Bless America
  • avatar Posted Jul 4, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #3
    Walmart isn't the only stores that have done this to employees. When I worked at SEARS...we had the same problems. I think it goes hand in hand with many big retail stores.
  • avatar Posted Jul 4, 2008 by  Chris V. (cgull)
    #4
    @ Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    I hope that they have to pay and pay big.
    The trouble is they have the money to keep going because so many do shop there.
    I very seldom go to WalMart because I don't like their practices and what they do.
    I prefer to shop elsewhere even though it might cost a little more.
    I also go very rarely and try to buy most of the items from local stores. The Wal-Mart owners are making billions and billions of dollars but they can spend some of it for their workers who are earning for them. How can they expect anyone to work non-stop?

    @ Hammster
    WallMart does a lot of good (fair market price is a relative term), but my family in N.C. had a tough time working for them.

    My mom (age 62 at the time) was expected to work 12 hour days (she stayed there about 2 months).

    My nephew (age 32) is a licensed option, he'd worked at a couple of WM's optical shops and said the quality of the good was to standard, but again long hours with no help.

    Retail is a different world (with an education all its' own from dealing with the public t unrealistic expectations for sales by the owner).

    I don't want to see WM go, and perhaps after the court gets done with them they'll be the better for it. My chief criticism of the company is how they will build a big store, stay in it 5 or 6 years then build a bigger store to move into, leaving small shop owners in the old center with a empty behemoth next them (Duluth - GA has two shopping centers this way).

    Happy Forth to all - GOD Bless America
    Sorry to hear about your family, Wal-Mart also has driven out lot of businesses by selling cheap at first and then increasing the prices slowly.
  • avatar Posted Jul 4, 2008 by  Chris V. (cgull)
    #5
    @ Debra Myers (skyangel)
    Walmart isn't the only stores that have done this to employees. When I worked at SEARS...we had the same problems. I think it goes hand in hand with many big retail stores.
    I agree I have seen it some private places also. Jobs which are replaceable they try to do this and if one protests, then they replace them with another worker. I heard from my friends Wal-Mart tried to do this in Germany but soon after they had to close
  • avatar Posted Jul 4, 2008 by  Nikki W (karateblossom)
    #6
    So much for their "wholesome" we treat our employees better than angels attitude! I hope they are ordered to pay big.

    You know, people say that there are always jobs available but it is situations like this that are the very reason why I can understand why some people remain unemployed for extended periods: they have higher respect for themselves than to be treated like trash.

    No one deserves to be treated like a slave.

    Here is a solution, as part of the pay out, have all the managers who even took part in it work 80 hours a week - giving the victim employees paid time to sit back and watch the abuser bosses flit back and forth between positions (free grill food included as part of the benefits of course).

    I'm sure this trend isn't just in Minnesota - the super giant just got BUSTED in Minnesota. Lets HOPE the payout hurts them enough to make them change their op procedures.

    Even starbucks, known for its "wonderful treatment of partners" overworks and stresses out its partners with no breaks, authoritative managers and long hours. To stand up against a giant? Noble!

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?