The Power of Citizen Journalism
 
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» How do I ...» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»
 

article imageThe White House Warns Detainees May Be Walking Down Main Street

Posted Jul 3, 2008 by  KJ (momentsintime) in Politics | 3 comments | 146 views
Join our team to voice opinions, share images, get paid to report news and more!
Email Print Share
Subscribe to author

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional
The White House said that dangerous detainees at Gitmo could be walking down your street because of last month's Supreme Court ruling. The truth is though that is very unlikely that would ever happen.
There are 270 detainees left at Guantanamo Bay who have the right to petition federal judges for immediate release.

Yahoo News quotes Dana Perino the White House press secretary as to saying:

"I'm sure that none of us want Khalid Sheikh Mohammed walking around our neighborhoods."


Since the chances of the detainees being allowed on United States soil is unlikely is this just a case of sour grapes? President George Bush strongly disagreed when the Supreme Court ruled that foreigners have the right to seek their release in civilian courtrooms. The court voted 5-4 in favor of the ruling.

While the legal ramifications are not very clear it is still unlikely that a federal appeals court would order a detainee to be released on U.S. soil even if the judge hearing the case deems that the prisoner was detained improperly. The judge can tell the Bush administration to release the prisoner but it would be up to the executive branch as to where the detainee would be sent.

That means if a detainee is walking down Main Street it is because George Bush and Co. told him he was free to wander the 50 states.

Last month after the ruling Attorney General Michael Mukasey predicted detainees would be flooding the court filing their right for freedom. Judges though have been wary of telling the executive branch what to do with the detainees in the meantime.

Last month it was ruled that Huzaifa Parhat, a Chinese Muslim had been improperly declared an enemy combatant. It was decided that Parhat should have a new hearing or be released.

Some experts like Glenn Sumasy believes that this situation requires a new type of court altogether, a hybrid court.

We are in uncharted territory, and we have never had enemy combatants afforded constitutional rights like all of us have, so anybody who thinks that they know exactly what's going to happen if a detainee challenges his detention — his or her detention — in court, they're not being honest because we don't know what's going to happen," Perino said.

"But there is considered judgment, from many federal government lawyers — all the way up to the attorney general of the United States_ that it is a very real possibility that a dangerous detainee could be released into the United States as a result of this Supreme Court decision."


At this time judges at Washington's federal courthouse are trying to quickly process the more than 200 cases dealing with detainees. Each case will require the Justice Department to admit why the detainee is being imprisoned and why they deserve the term of enemy combatant. Defense lawyers think that many cases will have evidence that does not hold up in civilian court.

Some of the cases may be decided as early as September. A hearing is set for Tuesday to decide how to proceed with the oncoming cases.
article:256936:5::0
3 subscribers
Subscribe to this thread
  • avatar Posted Jul 4, 2008 by  Sykos Masters
    #1
    Nice reporting KJ.

    I find the concept of a 'hybrid court' fascinating. I have to admit a certain ignorance, but how exactly did the remaining detainees get declared enemy combatants in the first place? I've never been able to find a clear summary of the events.
  • avatar Posted Jul 4, 2008 by  lensman67
    #2
    Of the SEVEN HUNDRED AND SEVENTY FIVE original victims of this Gulag OVER FIVE HUNDRED have turned out to be innocent victims of American injustice and have been released.

    We have absolutely no reason to believe ANYTHING the Bush regime has to say about the "guilt" or innocence of the remaining victims. Indeed, the very fact that Bush and Co. are desperately trying to keep the trials and, more importantly, the so called "evidence" against these people secrete proves beyond reasonable doubt that they have nothing that would stand up in a real court of law.

    My Fourth of July hope for the Cons who support Gitmo Gulag is that some day they get to sample this sort of "justice" for themselves.
  • avatar Posted Jul 4, 2008 by  Sykos Masters
    #3
    @lensman

    Thanks for the info. I've always read that much of the details were hidden for 'national security' reasons, but I'd hoped that specifics had somehow made it out after all this time. Weren't the majority imprisoned around 2003 or so? Five years is an unacceptable time to keep accused yet unproven enemy combatants.

    I ask these question because there is at least one Canadian being held who was 15 at the time of his 'capture'. Other than being in Afghanistan and giving a forced confession, they is no other proof. He was promised that once he confessed, he would be released to his family in Canada.

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?