The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     How do I ...»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageCNN Poll: Barack Obama and John Mccain In Statistical 'Dead Heat'

Posted Jul 1, 2008 by  Susan Duclos in Politics | 6 comments | 433 views
Next in Politics
Related News
Advertising
CNN'S new poll headlines with "New CNN Poll: Obama, McCain in a statistical dead heat". It shows that Obama holds a 5 percentage point lead on McCain until Bob Barr and Ralph Nader are added in, then Obama holds only 3 percentage point lead.
According to Keating Holland who is the CNN Polling Director, Obama holds a slight advantage over McCain but not enough to be considered a statistical lead and he even says that it appears that June has been a good month for Obama.

With the dust having finally settled after the prolonged Democratic presidential primary, a new CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll shows Sens. John McCain and Barack Obama locked in a statistical dead heat in the race for the White House.


This new survey also mentions the lingering question about Barack Obama's patriotism is still a factor in the statistics, with the breakdown showing that 10 percent of Democrats say say Obama lacks patriotism, with 29 percent of Independents of saying the same thing and that number rises to 40 percent of Republicans that believe that.

25 percent of all registered voters say Obama lacks patriotism,

90 percent of all registered voters view John McCain as being patriotic.

Even though the race becomes tighter when the third party candidates, Barr and Nader, are figured into the statistics, no one is clear at what actual effect they will have on the general election itself because as Holland says, "A useful rule of thumb is that third-party candidates in November get no more than half the support polls show them having in June or July."

The poll was conducted on June 26-29, 208, with 906 registered voters and holds a margin error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.
article:256825:9::0
3 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted Jul 1, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #1
    25 percent of all registered voters say Obama lacks patriotism,


    They haven't asked anyone down here where I live. Number would be much higher.
  • avatar Posted Jul 1, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #2
    I am sure it would be.
  • avatar Posted Jul 2, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #3
    I hate these polls as they don't always reflect a true cross-section of people.
  • redhawk Posted Jul 2, 2008 by  redhawk
    #4
    @ Mr Garibaldi
    They haven't asked anyone down here where I live. Number would be much higher.

    A LOT HIGHER from local polling also.. The Blank Slate is Slipping here also...
  • redhawk Posted Jul 2, 2008 by  redhawk
    #5
    https://commcenter.insightbb.com/attach/OB-BT254_oj_thi_20080701175511.jpg?sid=&mbox=INBOX&charset=escaped_unicode&uid=4859&number=4&filename=OB-BT254_oj_thi_20080701175511.jpg


    Intersting article about Barry from HO... It seems that the more times goes by he is actually adopting many of PRESIDENT Bush agendas... NOW that is CHANGE to believe in!! hahahahah
  • redhawk Posted Jul 2, 2008 by  redhawk
    #6
    > Bush's Third Term
    > July 2, 2008; Page A12
    >
    >
    > We're beginning to understand why Barack Obama keeps protesting so
    > vigorously against the prospect of "George Bush's third term." Maybe
    > he's worried that someone will notice that he's the candidate who's
    > running for it.
    >
    > Most Presidential candidates adapt their message after they win their
    > party nomination, but Mr. Obama isn't merely "running to the center."
    > He's fleeing from many of his primary positions so markedly and so
    > rapidly that he's embracing a sizable chunk of President Bush's
    > policy.Who would have thought that a Democrat would rehabilitate the
    > much-maligned Bush agenda?
    >
    >
    > Getty Images
    >
    > Take the surveillance of foreign terrorists. Last October, while
    > runningwith the Democratic pack, the Illinois Senator vowed to
    > "support a
    > filibuster of any bill that includes retroactive immunity for
    > telecommunications companies" that assisted in such
    > eavesdropping after
    > 9/11. As recently as February, still running as the liberal favorite
    > against Hillary Clinton, he was one of 29 Democrats who voted against
    > allowing a bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee reform of
    > surveillance rules even to come to the floor.
    >
    > Two weeks ago, however, the House passed a bill that is
    > essentially the
    > same as that Senate version, and Mr. Obama now says he supports it.
    > Apparently legal immunity for the telcos is vital for U.S. national
    > security, just as Mr. Bush has claimed. Apparently, too, the
    > legislationisn't an attempt by Dick Cheney to gut the
    > Constitution. Perhaps it is
    > dawning on Mr. Obama that, if he does become President, he'll be
    > responsible for preventing any new terrorist attack. So now he's happy
    > to throw the New York Times under the bus.
    >
    > Next up for Mr. Obama's political blessing will be Mr. Bush's Iraq
    > policy. Only weeks ago, the Democrat was calling for an
    > immediate and
    > rapid U.S. withdrawal. When General David Petraeus first
    > testified about
    > the surge in September 2007, Mr. Obama was dismissive and
    > skeptical. But
    > with the surge having worked wonders in Iraq, this week Mr.
    > Obama went
    > out of his way to defend General Petraeus against MoveOn.org's attacks
    > in 2007 that he was "General Betray Us." Perhaps he had a late
    > epiphany.
    > Look for Mr. Obama to use his forthcoming visit to Iraq as an
    > excuse to
    > drop those withdrawal plans faster than he can say Jeremiah
    > Wright "was
    > not the person that I met 20 years ago." The Senator will learn -
    > as
    > John McCain has been saying - that withdrawal would squander the gains
    > from the surge, set back Iraqi political progress, and weaken
    > America'sstrategic position against Iran. Our guess is that
    > he'll spin this
    > switcheroo as some kind of conditional commitment, saying he'll
    > stay in
    > Iraq as long as Iraqis are making progress on political
    > reconciliation,and so on. As things improve in Iraq, this would
    > be Mr. Bush's policy
    > too.
    >
    > Mr. Obama has also made ostentatious leaps toward Mr. Bush on domestic
    > issues. While he once bid for labor support by pledging a unilateral
    > rewrite of Nafta, the Democrat now says he favors free trade as
    > long as
    > it works for "everybody." His economic aide, Austan Goolsbee,
    > has been
    > liberated from the five-month purdah he endured for telling Canadians
    > that Mr. Obama's protectionism was merely campaign rhetoric. Now that
    > Mr. Obama is in a general election, he can't scare the business
    > community too much.
    >
    > Back in the day, the first-term Senator also voted against the Supreme
    > Court nominations of John Roberts and Samuel Alito. But last
    > week he
    > agreed with their majority opinion in the Heller gun rights
    > case, and
    > with their dissent against the liberal majority's ruling to ban the
    > death penalty for rape. Mr. Obama seems to appreciate that getting
    > pegged as a cultural lefty is deadly for national Democrats - at least
    > until November.
    >
    > This week the great Democratic hope even endorsed spending more
    > money on
    > faith-based charities. Apparently, this core plank of Mr. Bush's
    > "compassionate conservatism" is not the assault on church-state
    > separation that the ACLU and liberals have long claimed. And
    > yesterday,Mr. Obama's campaign unveiled an ad asserting his
    > support for welfare
    > reform that "slashed the rolls by 80 percent." Never mind that
    > Mr. Obama
    > has declared multiple times that he opposed the landmark 1996 welfare
    > reform.
    >
    >
    > * * *
    >
    >
    > All of which prompts a couple of thoughts. The first is that Mr. Obama
    > doesn't seem to think American political sentiment has moved as
    > far left
    > as most of the media claim. Another is that the next President,
    > whetherDemocrat or Republican, is going to embrace much of Mr.
    > Bush's foreign
    > and antiterror policy whether he admits it or not. Think Eisenhower
    > endorsing Truman's Cold War architecture.
    >
    > Most important is the matter of Mr. Obama's political character -
    > and
    > how honest he is being about what he truly believes. His voting record
    > in the Senate and in Illinois, as well as his primary positions, would
    > make him the most liberal Presidential candidate since George McGovern
    > in 1972. But he clearly doesn't want voters to believe that in
    > November.He's still the Obama Americans don't know.
    >

    NOW as we were saying about change????? Can this Empty Slate be trusted with Anything???

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?