Op-Ed: Muslims Hate Dogs?

The idea of a dog as being ritually unclean is one I had not considered. The Scottish Muslims are in an uproar over the picture of a dog on a postcard from the local police.

Muslims hate dogs, as ritually unclean? Most likely because Ole Moe got bit on the butt at some point by a viscous Pomeranian or maybe a Poodlette. At any rate, they don't care for the concept of pooch. As such the Muslim population in the Scottish district of Tayside are all up in arms (figuratively, at this time) about a pooch being on a post card sent by the police to advertise a new non emergency phone number. The uproar over the pooch, as a ritually unclean critter fits in with the Islamification of the EU and in this case Scotland by the infiltrating Muslim population. The idea of being able to Islamify a country from within by simply being an advocate for "tolerance" of Islam is really dealt with in several different sites on the net. They can be googled to your hearts content, but the gist of the process is here. The post shows how Islamification works and at what percentages of the population the various means are used to propel the entire country toward an Islamic state. In this regard, Islam is much like a viral infection, usurping the host nations defenses to protect itself, and to take over the host nation without so much as a whimper or sneeze. The American Left in politics seems to be willing participants in the process here at home, mostly from a perspective of a very short term point of political gain. Not an overly intelligent position, nor is it one which is brilliantly conceived with the long term survival aspects of this nation in mind. But as is so often the case these days, neither dominant political party appears to have the absolute best interests of the nation in mind. Only the desire to dominate as the Reigning Legions of the New American Aristocracy - CONgress and the rest of the political landscape. In part, that would be the reason for the assault on the Second Amendment in the US of A, an unarmed populace has no choice but to follow where the leaders lead. Irrespective of the destination or the consequences. An armed population can at some critical juncture simply say "No" and the answer will have the teeth to make it bite. When that occurs, and it seems to some to be on the way, who will emerge to be the Leader willing to sacrifice everything to lead the nation back to it's roots of Individual Merit, and Individual Responsibility? None on the political landscape at this time appear to have the ability or the willingness.