The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     How do I ...»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageSan Francisco plans to name sewage treatment plant after Bush

Posted Jun 26, 2008 by  Chris V. (cgull) in Politics | 8 comments | 305 views
Next in Politics
Related News
Advertising
The Presidential Memorial Commission of San Francisco is planning to ask voters to change the name of a prize-winning water-treatment plant in San Fran to the George W. Bush Sewage Plant.
The committee members devised this plan apparently in a bar and want to place it on the coming November election ballot. They say they want to provide "an appropriate honor for a truly unique president."

Former presidents get highlighted in a number of ways in the form of a memorial (Lincoln), capital (Washington), highways (Reagan), and some are carved in the mountain for posterity (George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Abraham Lincoln in Mt. Rushmore).

Now, the San Francisco commission wants to honor Bush by naming a sewage plant after him. The prize-winning plant is now called as Oceanside Water Pollution Control Plant.

The commission claims it has enough signatures to qualify this plan and put it to vote on a ballot. The reason given for the plan is to continue the "long and proud American tradition of poking political figures in the eye."

Brian McConnell, one of the organizers told the International Herald Tribune (IHT):
"Most politicians tend to be narcissistic and egomaniacs...So it is important for satirists to help define their history rather than letting them define their own history."

The Republicans in the city are not happy with the plan; Howard Epstein, chairman of San Francisco Republican Party, called the initiative abuse of political process.

Epstein told IHT:
"You got a bunch of guys drunk who came up with an idea...and want to put on the ballot as a big joke without regard to the city's governance or cost."

If the initiative goes according to plan, the renaming will start on January 20, 2009, the day the new president will be sworn in.

Even if the plan doesn't go through, the organizers are planning for a "synchronized flush" of hundreds of thousands of toilets that will send a flood of water to the sewage treatment plant on the new President's inaugural day.

Stacey Reineccius, 45, a supporter of the plan told IHT:
"It's a way of doing something physical that's mentally freeing...It's a weird thing, but it's true."
article:256596:8::0
3 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted Jun 26, 2008 by  lensman67
    #1
    Gee, I don't know. At least a sewage plant is useful, and harms no one, which is a darn site more than can be said for the current occupant of the White House.

    Besides I don't think Bush has much use for sewage treatment plants, preferring to keep most of his product in his head.
  • avatar Posted Jun 26, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #2
    @ lensman67
    Gee, I don't know. At least a sewage plant is useful, and harms no one, which is a darn site more than can be said for the current occupant of the White House.

    Besides I don't think Bush has much use for sewage treatment plants, preferring to keep most of his product in his head.


    LOLOL! That's pretty funny, lens!
  • avatar Posted Jun 26, 2008 by  ProudMarineMom
    #3
    Figures! God help us --- the children are in charge!
  • Jedediah Redman Posted Jun 26, 2008 by  Jedediah Redman
    #4
    @ ProudMarineMom
    Figures! God help us --- the children are in charge!


    I think Semper Fidelis may have been as appropriate as G W Bush for a name...
  • avatar Posted Jun 26, 2008 by  lensman67
    #5
    Actually naming a sewage treatment plant after Bush is an insult--to a perfectly good sewage plant! ;o)
  • avatar Posted Jun 26, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #6
    "You got a bunch of guys drunk who came up with an idea...and want to put on the ballot as a big joke without regard to the city's governance or cost."

    I agree with this statement.

    A bunch of guys who have had too much to drink should never be taken seriously.
  • avatar Posted Jun 26, 2008 by  lensman67
    #7
    @ Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    I agree with this statement.

    A bunch of guys who have had too much to drink should never be taken seriously.

    That would certainly include Bush, who was an alcoholic until he was about 40 and has been a "dry drunk" ever since.

    Even thought he supposedly doesn't drink anymore it is obvious that he did not stop in time and managed to kill off the few brain cells he was born with.
  • avatar Posted Jun 26, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #8
    @ lensman67
    That would certainly include Bush, who was an alcoholic until he was about 40 and has been a "dry drunk" ever since.

    Even thought he supposedly doesn't drink anymore it is obvious that he did not stop in time and managed to kill off the few brain cells he was born with.


    Something obviously is wrong as he has made some bad decisions.

    According to the Los Angeles Times President Bush's approval rating is at an all time low. Only 23% of all registered voters. In February his approval rating was 35%.

    I wonder what it will be when he leaves.

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?