The Power of Citizen Journalism
 
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» How do I ...» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»
 

article imageBiofuels Increase Food Prices 30 Per Cent, 30 Million People Face Poverty Worldwide

Posted Jun 25, 2008 by  Chris Hogg in Environment | 10 comments | 619 views
Join our team to voice opinions, share images, get paid to report news and more!
Email Print Share
Subscribe to author

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional
According to a report issued by aid agency Oxfam today, biofuels are to blame for a 30 per cent increase in global food prices. In the search for alternative fuel sources, Oxfam says biofuels have also pushed 30 million people into poverty globally.

Digital Journal -- As the world looks for a viable alternative to oil, Oxfam has issued a report saying biofuels are certainly not a solution to fighting climate change or the global food crisis.

“Policies promoting biofuels are actually helping to accelerate climate change and deepen poverty and hunger,” said report author Rob Bailey, Oxfam’s biofuels policy advisor, in a news release. “Thanks to generous subsidies and tax breaks, the fuel value for a crop now exceeds its food value. It is no surprise that, despite bumper crops, grain reserves are at an all-time low.”

Developing countries are seeing their biofuel use climb dramatically as governments and private firms look to cut back their dependence on oil and reduce carbon dioxide emissions. However, in the search for an alternative, critics like Oxfam say commodity prices are climbing as a result and the world now faces grain shortages.

Robert Fox, executive director of Oxfam Canada, says people should reject government biofuel initiatives. “The law [in Canada] would in effect tax poor consumers through higher food prices by subsidizing the conversion of the corn crop into ethanol."

Fox says people living in poverty will be hit hardest because their food bills represent a greater proportion of their total income. “And due to the globalized food system, our policies contribute to rising food prices in poor countries around the world," said Fox.

Photo by Jams_123
image:41206:3::0

Oxfam says wealthy countries spent a whopping $15 billion in 2007 by supporting biofuel initiatives through targets, subsidies, tax breaks and tariffs. In Canada alone, Oxfam says taxpayers will be paying $1 billion every year in biofuel subsidies by 2010.

Recent studies show ethanol may actually harm the environment more than help it, as it emits more greenhouse gases than gas over its entire cycle, including both production and consumption.

“Even if the entire world’s supply of grains and sugars were converted into ethanol tomorrow – in the process leaving us little to eat – we would only be able to replace 40 per cent of our gasoline and diesel consumption,” Bailey said.

“More than half of Canada’s corn crop would have to be turned into fuel to meet the five per cent target proposed in the legislation before the Senate,” Fox said. “Burning food in our cars while people go hungry is madness.”

The 58-page report can be found in PDF format here.
article:256589:21::0
4 subscribers
Subscribe to this thread
  • avatar Posted Jun 25, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #1
    I was looking at this earlier today and must agree that burning food in our cars is madness.
  • avatar Posted Jun 25, 2008 by  RCB2875
    #2
    WoW who could have seen that coming!? lmao
    Yay for Ethanol... Good thing we didn't convert the whole infrastructure yet?
  • Jedediah Redman Posted Jun 25, 2008 by  Jedediah Redman
    #3
    Convenience and comfort for upper classes certainly trumps survival for wogs...
  • avatar Posted Jun 25, 2008 by  Gar Swaffar
    #4
    @ Bob Ewing
    I was looking at this earlier today and must agree that burning food in our cars is madness.


    That would have seemed a no brainer wouldn't it? Governments obviously have... no brains?


    @ RCB2875
    WoW who could have seen that coming!? lmao
    Yay for Ethanol... Good thing we didn't convert the whole infrastructure yet?


    See above



    @ Jedediah Redman
    Convenience and comfort for upper classes certainly trumps survival for wogs...


    Wogs? Horst, have you ever had anything positive to say? If so, is it written down somewhere so you can reference that feeling?
    And, wogs?
  • avatar Posted Jun 26, 2008 by  Saikat Basu (Maverick)
    #5
    Is it a reflection of our mad rush towards 'supposedly' greener technologies without taking into consideration their side effects? Artificial fertilizer based agriculture is already creating problems for the supposed food basket areas in my country. Thankfully, ethanol use is still not too widespread and can be rolled back I suppose.
  • avatar Posted Jun 26, 2008 by  Paul Wallis (Wanderlaugh)
    #6
    Nice to see we've now got a working mechanism in place for knowing exactly how to impoverish a given number of people. Add oil prices, and it'll be like 1929 never left.
  • avatar Posted Jun 26, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #7
    Oxfam says biofuels have also pushed 30 million people into poverty globally.


    I believe this. Because of this too...everyone will suffer...but those who were at the brink, will have been/will be shoved right off.
  • avatar Posted Jun 26, 2008 by  Sykos Masters
    #8
    Great report Chris ... thx for the pdf link too!

    I've always been mystified why the majority of 'solutions' regarding our energy consumption have focused on the supply side of the equation. North Americans seem to have forgotten the lessons of the 30's – 50's; rather than actively curbing our consumption, we drive the suppliers to come up with quick fixes that will allow us to continue life as 'usual'.

    In contrast, although Europe (specifically the UK) has also been in the news for truck strikes and other protests over rising oil prices, the average European hasn't been impacted as much as we in NA. Why? Because their mindset includes that one pays a premium for what one wants: e.g., auto fuel (petrol), cable television. Needs, i.e., home heating, electricity, (wider) internet service, are offered at an affordable rate and then discounted when one supplements the supply with personal alternate methods. Windmills, solar energy appliances / modifications, recycling are encouraged and rewarded in Europe.

    All the biofuel, advanced coal, and mixed fuel (ethanol mix) technologies in the world won't have the desired effect in NA until we as consumers learn and commit to using less energy.
  • Jedediah Redman Posted Jun 26, 2008 by  Jedediah Redman
    #9
    @ Gar Swaffar
    That would have seemed a no brainer wouldn't it? Governments obviously have... no brains?


    See above



    Wogs? Horst, have you ever had anything positive to say? If so, is it written down somewhere so you can reference that feeling?
    And, wogs?


    It would be discernible only to people whose IQ was higher than their hat size...
  • Jedediah Redman Posted Jun 26, 2008 by  Jedediah Redman
    #10
    @ Sykos Masters
    Great report Chris ... thx for the pdf link too!

    I've always been mystified why the majority of 'solutions' regarding our energy consumption have focused on the supply side of the equation. North Americans seem to have forgotten the lessons of the 30's – 50's; rather than actively curbing our consumption, we drive the suppliers to come up with quick fixes that will allow us to continue life as 'usual'.

    In contrast, although Europe (specifically the UK) has also been in the news for truck strikes and other protests over rising oil prices, the average European hasn't been impacted as much as we in NA. Why? Because their mindset includes that one pays a premium for what one wants: e.g., auto fuel (petrol), cable television. Needs, i.e., home heating, electricity, (wider) internet service, are offered at an affordable rate and then discounted when one supplements the supply with personal alternate methods. Windmills, solar energy appliances / modifications, recycling are encouraged and rewarded in Europe.

    All the biofuel, advanced coal, and mixed fuel (ethanol mix) technologies in the world won't have the desired effect in NA until we as consumers learn and commit to using less energy.


    There is a side of you dedicated to credibility, then..?

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?