The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     How do I ...»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageOpinion: Endorsements from our Enemies - Why Can't Barack Obama Catch a Break From Them?

Posted Jun 22, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi in Politics | 13 comments | 1368 views
Next in Politics
Related News
Advertising
Presidential candidates often seek out endorsements from prominent figures not only nationally, but throughout the world, during election years. What, however, does it say for a candidate when a nation's enemies endorse a candidate?
It's a conspiracy theorists dream situation that Barack Hussein Obama finds himself facing.

The Democratic party front-runner and likely nominee in the upcoming Denver national convention has overcome the Clinton machine, rising through the ranks quickly to go from Congress into not even a full term in the Senate, into the launching position to become, possibly, the President of the United States.

His quick rise to fame and popularity is a tale straight out of the Brothers Grimm; a fairy tale ascension to power from the local to the national level, with a somewhat Messianic appeal to the public that hasn't been seen since the 1930's in Germany. Captivating audiences initially with his message of hope and change, Obama quickly soared into position to take on the "inevitable" Hillary Clinton campaign, ultimately defeating her and ending her hopes of becoming the first woman to gain the White House in the 2008 election cycle.

But at what cost to the nation does the rise of Obama bring? His campaign catch phrases, "hope and change," have done little, really, to address a hope in what, or a to address what changes that he intends for the nation, other than mentions of higher taxes and the promise to bring our combat forces home from Iraq within the first year and a half of his administration.

Perhaps, in seeking the true nature and character of the man, candidate Brarack Hussein Obama, one should begin by looking at his list not of detractors, but at his list of supporters, and examine the causes they represent.

Jesse Jackson - political activist and civil rights activist. Very spotty record since the King days in his methods of promoting social and political change. Jackson has also been called a "shadow senator" from the District of Columbia.

Jane Fonda - actress and war protester who posed with North Vietnamese forces in a photo-op during the Vietnam War.

Danny Glover - actor cum political activist known for his support of Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez.

Bill Maher - Comedian and political commentator host of Politically Incorrect (which it is anything but), known for his anti-American and anti-Christian remarks.

Spike Lee - actor, political activist, director, known for his controversial race relations films and statements.

Mayor Douglas Wilder - Mayor of Richmond, Virginia, and former Governor of Virginia, who called for riots at the Denver DNC if Obama was not the party nominee.


And many others, listed here.

But this is just barely the tip of the iceberg in controversial figures endorsing Obama, and all of the above mentioned are Americans. What about his endorsements from overseas groups? This past week, Obama has received endorsements from two groups who have been and are stated enemies of the United States.

While Sen. Barack Obama sought to improve his relationship with the Jewish community today by meeting with leaders in Philadelphia, comments by a Hamas political adviser this weekend could potentially hurt the Democratic presidential candidate.

During an interview on WABC radio Sunday, top Hamas political adviser Ahmed Yousef said the terrorist group supports Obama’s foreign policy vision.

“We don’t mind–actually we like Mr. Obama. We hope he will (win) the election and I do believe he is like John Kennedy, great man with great principle, and he has a vision to change America to make it in a position to lead the world community but not with domination and arrogance,” Yousef said in response to a question about the group’s willingness to meet with either of the Democratic presidential candidates.


This endorsement brings back up the resignation earlier this year of Obama adviser Rob Malley over controversy surrounding his ties to Hamas. Seeking to put an end to any rumors or speculation of any links to Hamas by Obama, Malley stepped down in an attempt to shed the campaign of such speculations, speculations with have revived with the endorsement of Obama by Hamas leadership this week.

To compound the situation facing the Obama team in light of the Hamas endorsement, Obama received another dubious endorsement this week, this time coming from North Korea.

The Chosun Sinbo, the mouthpiece of North Korea’s Japanese front organization Chongryon and often for the North Korean regime itself, has announced its preference for Obama over McCain, whom it calls “a variant of Bush” and “nothing better than a scarecrow of neoconservatives,” which is a bit odd considering that the Bush Administration’s giveaway diplomacy is better for Kim Jong Il than even Clinton’s awful performance.


So what does this say of the character of candidate Obama, that he receives endorsements from at least two of our nation's enemies? Are there expectations of Obama from these endorsements, or are they merely well wishes from foreign nationals who have interests that are not in the interest of the American people? Given the record of flip-flopping that has been characteristic of Obama of late, and the support of members of the Democratic party being withheld from his campaign, could it be that there are, at this late stage of the election cycle, important issues that we, the voting public are unaware of but that are known to these groups overseas who are endorsing him? Could it be that there is information being gleaned from Barack Hussein Obama's Muslim Kenyan half-brother Malik to which we are not privy?

Whatever the answers, for some reason, two of America's enemies are interested in seeing Barack Hussein Obama elected to the office of the President. Why can't Obama catch a break in endorsements from our enemies? Perhaps it's because he doesn't deserve one...
article:256451:11::0
3 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted Jun 22, 2008 by  Gar Swaffar
    #1
    Makes me wonder if Uday and Qusay would endorse NObama
  • avatar Posted Jun 22, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #2
    There is one glaring endorsement that Obama has not gotten yet... via Reuters, and that is Bill Clinton.

    The former first lady endorsed Obama, urged her supporters to rally behind him and is scheduled to campaign with him later this week.

    But her husband has not publicly endorsed the presumptive Democratic nominee to succeed President George W. Bush. Asked by journalists when he might do so, Clinton smiled and shook hands with spectators without acknowledging he heard the question.


    I am sure, eventually he will, he sort of has to, or does he????
  • avatar Posted Jun 22, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #3
    Nope. I would be unprecedented if he doesn't, but no, he doesn't have to.
  • skeptikool Posted Jun 22, 2008 by  skeptikool
    #4
    His quick rise to fame and popularity is a tale straight out of the Brothers Grimm; a fairy tale ascension to power from the local to the national level, with a somewhat Messianic appeal to the public that hasn't been seen since the 1930's in Germany.


    I think the author needs to get up out of the gutter, with the sleazy innuendo.

    One has little control over who announces support. One should never dismiss mischievous intent - though, in this case, I imagine they see him as the better choice to determine future U.S. foreign policy.
  • avatar Posted Jun 22, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #5
    @ skeptikool
    I think the author needs to get up out of the gutter, with the sleazy innuendo.

    One has little control over who announces support. One should never dismiss mischievous intent - though, in this case, I imagine they see him as the better choice to determine future U.S. foreign policy.


    That's your opinion, skep, and you're welcome to it. It is what it is.

    I call it like I see it. I see in Obama's early campaign something very familiar, as I said.

    As to his endorsements from our enemies, if he wasn't preaching something that they liked hearing, they certainly wouldn't be saying "yeah, you're the MAN!" now, would they?
  • Laurie Green Posted Jun 23, 2008 by  Laurie Green
    #6
    Mr. Garibaldi, what does it imply that the list of supporters you link includes 21 current and former members of the U. S. armed forces; William Donaldson, who was appointed by George W. Bush to Chairmanship of the SEC; David Ruder, Ronald Reagan's appointee to the same position; Richard Nixon's daughter, Julie Eisenhower; and Kirbyjon Caldwell, George W. Bush's spiritual advisor?
  • avatar Posted Jun 23, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #7
    @ skeptikool
    I think the author needs to get up out of the gutter, with the sleazy innuendo.

    One has little control over who announces support. One should never dismiss mischievous intent - though, in this case, I imagine they see him as the better choice to determine future U.S. foreign policy.


    It is always telling to see WHO chooses to endorse and who is rooting for what candidate. To you it gutter talk, to most it is common sense to acknowledge the type of people drawn to a particular candidate.

    The fact that terrorists, terror group's senior advisers, as well as tyrants are hoping for an Obama presidency is VERY relevant to those that do not prefer to stick our heads in the sands and ignore how those type of people gravitate to Obama.

    You might not like it, but it is news and it is something people need to be aware of and ask the question of WHY.

    Mr. G, thank you very much for pointing it out.
  • Jedediah Redman Posted Jun 23, 2008 by  Jedediah Redman
    #8
    Mikey is simply attempting to demonize Obama.
    His methods are similar to methods used by propagandists to demonize those enemies he lists.
    The really sad thing is it will work on a majority of the thinkers on this forum...
  • avatar Posted Jun 23, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #9
    @ Jedediah Redman
    Mikey is simply attempting to demonize Obama.
    His methods are similar to methods used by propagandists to demonize those enemies he lists.
    The really sad thing is it will work on a majority of the thinkers on this forum...


    So what are you saying, Jed...that we don't have our own minds and thoughts...that we just follow the crowd? NOT HARDLY!
  • avatar Posted Jun 23, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #10
    @ Debra Myers (skyangel)
    So what are you saying, Jed...that we don't have our own minds and thoughts...that we just follow the crowd? NOT HARDLY!


    Debra, when people cannot address the truth, they often accuse those telling it of trying to demonize.

    Which always makes me laugh because if they think that, then they must think the truth is demonizing TO that person.

    HEH

    That implication shows that those trying to change the subject are AWARE of how bad it is when our nation's enemies support one specific candidate and they are too cowardly to ask themselves, honestly, WHY that scares them so badly.
  • avatar Posted Jun 23, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #11
    As Sykos Masters said on another thread, he stated that he decided whom to vote for on the person, themselves. Exactly what all of us with brains would/should do! Not follow the crowd!
  • avatar Posted Jun 23, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #12
    @ Jedediah Redman
    Mikey is simply attempting to demonize Obama.
    His methods are similar to methods used by propagandists to demonize those enemies he lists.
    The really sad thing is it will work on a majority of the thinkers on this forum...


    I didn't demonize Obama, he's doing that perfectly well on his own. All I'm doing is pointing out the things that I see.

    Nice try, multi-name phoney, but we see through you and your alter-egos around here. Why don't you try posting as either lens or Hurst again for a while? Or has one of those been banned already for making racist comments again?
  • avatar Posted Jun 23, 2008 by  Dave G. (TruthMan)
    #13
    I think Bill Clinton hasn't publicly endorsed him yet because he may know something about Obama. Although Hillary has publicly endorsed him, she hasn't given up her delegates to him yet. This isn't over until the Democratic National Convention ends in Denver, Colorado.

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?