article imageAn army on antidepressants: US military dilemma as mental health issues rise

By Paul Wallis.
Subscribe to author
Published Jun 8, 2008 by  Paul Wallis - 22 votes, 18 comments
Share on Facebook  
Listen - Email - Print
Recipient email:
You can enter up to 10 comma-separated email addresses.
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

The effects of protracted warfare have been generating some protracted arguments about mental health care. While the issues are fundamentally stress and combat-related, both the public and the troops’ expectations for care and treatment have risen.
Those expectations aren’t unreasonable. This is the 21st Century. Things are supposed to have got better than the days when people debated whether there was such a thing as shock. The standard of care in the mental health area for US troops is a very sore point with the families of service personnel.
Depression is a physical condition with severe effects on mental health. People with depression aren’t actually going nuts. The hormones balancing brain chemistry are out of whack, and that imbalance is what causes the problem. Many people who’ve had depression, (and I’m one of them) would say they’ve had physical injuries that were much less of a problem than depression, without adding a war to the situation.
TIME Magazine has this story, and it’s a rather large, grim assessment of the situation:
For the first time in history, a sizable and growing number of U.S. combat troops are taking daily doses of antidepressants to calm nerves strained by repeated and lengthy tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. The medicines are intended not only to help troops keep their cool but also to enable the already strapped Army to preserve its most precious resource: soldiers on the front lines. Data contained in the Army's fifth Mental Health Advisory Team report indicate that, according to an anonymous survey of U.S. troops taken last fall, about 12% of combat troops in Iraq and 17% of those in Afghanistan are taking prescription antidepressants or sleeping pills to help them cope. Escalating violence in Afghanistan and the more isolated mission have driven troops to rely more on medication there than in Iraq, military officials say.
Even this relatively straight narrative is debatable, medically. Constant trauma, stress, and fatigue don’t do much for anyone’s health. Depression often occurs in people who are physically debilitated by disease or stress.
If you’re getting hit by surges of adrenalin every day, combined with massive physical exertion, and more or less continuous levels of trauma, you can assume that you’re going to be feeling the effects. It’s probably fair to say that stress isn’t really relative to people, but it is relative to situations.
The increase in the use of medication among U.S. troops suggests the heavy mental and psychological price being paid by soldiers fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. Pentagon surveys show that while all soldiers deployed to a war zone will feel stressed, 70% will manage to bounce back to normalcy. But about 20% will suffer from what the military calls "temporary stress injuries," and 10% will be afflicted with "stress illnesses." Such ailments, according to briefings commanders get before deploying, begin with mild anxiety and irritability, difficulty sleeping, and growing feelings of apathy and pessimism.
These are mean statistics for what would add up to a very large number of people. In fairness to the US military, troops are given some psychological preparation for combat, (to the extent it can be done) and the combat culture is based on mutual support.
It’s not an administrative issue that can be pinned down well, and it’s not exactly the best environment for treating a medical condition. So some conditions worsen:
As the condition worsens, the feelings last longer and can come to include panic, rage, uncontrolled shaking and temporary paralysis. The symptoms often continue back home, playing a key role in broken marriages, suicides and psychiatric breakdowns. The mental trauma has become so common that the Pentagon may expand the list of "qualifying wounds" for a Purple Heart — historically limited to those physically injured on the battlefield — to include posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
There’s a terrible irony in equating PTSD and “qualifying wounds”, even if I’m sure nobody quite made that connection when they came up with the idea.
The military vocabulary includes quite a lot of acronyms, too many for a healthy conversation.
The worst are KIA, MIA, WIA and now PTSD.
They’re all a qualification for something…
The TIME article is explanation enough. Read the comments from service people about how treatment is organized, and see if you think these guys have something else to worry about.
article:255852:22::0

Opinion: Health care bill passes, now the real battle

The wait is over. The House of Representatives passed the Obama administration health bill in a close vote. Concessions about insurance for abortions and all, the bill is now headed for the Senate.
Published 12 hours ago by  Paul Wallis in Politics | 10 comments

Phase 3 of 2010 Olympic ticket sales delayed until November 14

The third phase of ticket sales for the Vancouver/Whistler 2010 Winter Olympics and Paralympics was delayed by one week because of a configuration problem on the ticket sales website.
Published 13 hours ago by  Julian Worker in Sports

Iranian officials say 109 people arrested at U.S. Embassy Rally

Authorities in Iran have announced that 109 people were arrested in Tehran on Wednesday as security forces clashed with supporters of opposition leader Mir-Hossein Mousavi at a rally to mark the anniversary of the seizure of the U.S. embassy.
Published 18 hours ago by  Chris Dade in Politics

Virtual goods now a $5-billion global industry

With minutes to go before the end of the day, you visit Facebook and send out a quick birthday cake to a friend. It's $1 for the virtual icon that is simply displayed on their page. Sound silly? Well, these types of transactions are now worth billions.
Published yesterday by  KJ Mullins in Internet | 1 comment

What Facebook, Twitter, PayPal can teach us about going viral Special

Going viral isn't a finger-snap way to achieve mass popularity. In fact, as author Adam L. Penenberg explains to Digitaljournal.com, some of the top tech companies found viral success by creating a product that had to be shared to be useful.
Published yesterday by  David Silverberg in Internet | 2 comments
apis-129219 apis-129223 apis-129206 apis-129186 apis-129159
Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?