The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     How do I ...»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageOp-Ed: American Congress to Outlaw Free Speech

Posted Jun 4, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence in Politics | 15 comments | 332 views
Next in Politics
Related News
1 more article on this subject:
Advertising
It went unnoticed by the American people, but now it is all over the media about a new piece of legislation passed by the house to stop "propaganda" by the Pentagon.
After participating in the journalism field for over a year now I have found that propaganda is the name of the game. No matter who is writing the story, someones propaganda is being reported. It has nothing to do with "fairness" because as long as you report on all propaganda equally you are being fair. There is hardly a news article, a movement, a speech, a rally, a fundraiser, or any social event that is not in promotion of some ideal or cause. Our lives revolve around propaganda, in America we call it "free speech."

There are many in the country who believe that free speech comes at a cost, namely responsibility for one's actions. However the current culture of victimization has made it impossible for people to expect that anyone be held responsible for their actions, unless of course they are people who attempt to enforce laws or morals. Congress has adopted this mentality and made it paranoid by aiming once again at hindering any and all who would put their lives on the line for the country.

The military already has many restrictions when it comes to free speech, military members are expected to represent the military appropriately when they are in uniform. They are not permitted to give away defensive positions, tactics, troop movements, or strategy. These are all restrictions that have been willingly accepted by members upon entering the military. it is understood that having the freedom to speak is a powerful tool. As Uncle Ben said, "With great power comes great responsibility."

The media has been on a full out assault on American policies and the American military. The amount of misinformation, propaganda, and outright lies told in the past 5 years by the media and civilians has caused a rift in the public and a polarization not seen since the Vietnam Era. The "youngsters" from that era are now coming to full power in the United States government. It seems their latest order of business is not to make sure the country runs smoothly, you can see that their job approval rating is even lower than the President at a current 18 percent of the population in approval.

The Associated Press reported new legislation, an amendment to H.R. 5658, has passed the House that would prevent the military from expressing " any form of communication in support of national objectives designed to influence the opinions, emotions, attitudes or behavior of the people of the United States in order to benefit the sponsor, either directly or indirectly." Programs approved by congress, like recruiting, are exempt from the law. However, if congress ever decides to take recruiting off of that list, well, then if the military members say anything positive about the military that may benefit them by procuring a new recruit would be essentially illegal. Even though they acknowledge that enforcing this law would be difficult it is still going through.

Apparently this latest congressional hissy fit is in response to the Pentagon putting together a program that made sure positive news about Iraq would be released to the public. The writer from the AP uses some rather charged language to make it seem nefarious and clandestine, but in reality if the Pentagon did not make an effort to make sure that information was given to the public they would only be hearing one side. Call it information, call it propaganda, call it what you will, Congress is upset that the Pentagon took an interest in the lives of the military members and went on an offensive in unconventional warfare tactics used by the enemy from without and from within.

A recent report shows that the negative media has lead to the death of Iraqi civilians and soldiers by emblodening the enemy. The enemy who has employed "irregular warfare" to destroy America. On high information days in the media that shows a polarized America with weak resolve, attacks were stepped up 7-10 per cent. Irregular Warfare (IW) is define as "a violent struggle among state and nonstate actors for legitimacy and influence over the relevant populations. IW favors indirect approaches, though it may employ the full range of military and other capabilities to seek asymmetric approaches in order to erode an adversary's power, influence, and will." Propaganda and misinformation are weapons of irregular warfare.

It is not radical thinking that the current actions of congress smell of subversive tactics from within. Consider the words of Osama Bin Laden.

"It has been made clear during our defending and fighting against the American enemy that this enemy's combat strategy is heavily dependent on the psychological aspect of war due to its large and efficient media apparatus and of course its indiscriminate aerial bombing which hides the cowardice and lack of fighting spirit of the American soldier. …


Osama Bin Laden: Al-Qaeda Intends To Launch "A Media Campaign ... To Create A Wedge Between The American People And Their Government." (Letter From Osama Bin Laden To Mullah Omar, Released By The White House Press Office, 9/5/06)

Bin Laden: This Media Campaign Will Stress "That [The American] Government Would Bring Them More Losses, In Finances And In Casualties." (Letter From Osama Bin Laden To Mullah Omar, Released By The White House Press Office, 9/5/06)

Bin Laden: The Media Campaign "Aims At Creating Pressure From The American People On The American Government To Stop Their Campaign Against Afghanistan." (Letter From Osama Bin Laden To Mullah Omar, Released By The White House Press Office, 9/5/06)



Just remember, This is considered appropriate.

Vote it up! 2 votes
General Betray us ad
Propaganda by Moveon.org
Moveon.org (Creative Commons - Attribution)


Yes I know they "condemned" the ad, but you do not see them passing legislation making it illegal.

It is okay for Osama Bin Laden tapes to be played on all outlets, but a U.S. General cannot speak about he positive facts in Iraq.

It is okay for the Winter Soldiers to have entire press outings about the negative aspects of war, but a soldier talking about the benefit the war is having would be illegal.

Propaganda from the WWII era for your viewing pleasure. Remember this would be considered "illegal" if the United States Congress has their way.

Vote it up! 3 votes
Propaganda Piece from WWII
n/a (Public Domain)


Vote it up! 5 votes
World War II Propaganda
Promotes Victory Gardens to save food and extend rations. Oh the Horror.
n/a (Public Domain)


Vote it up! 3 votes
World War II Propaganda -Car Pooling
Promoting gas conservation by car pooling, remember, the military cannot do this to promote better use of fuel. But ELF can!
n/a (All Rights Reserved)


Vote it up! 3 votes
World War II -Gas Conservation
When the defenders of American Freedom were actually respected enough to suggest that saving Gas was a good thing.
N/a (Public Domain)
article:255628:18::0
2 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted Jun 4, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #1
    Good catch Sam.
  • avatar Posted Jun 4, 2008 by  Carolyn E. Price (gohomelaker)
    #2
    Excellent post, Sam, so very well written.

    This is a really interesting topic. Honestly, all areas of government are businesses now, and as such, most business owners would like to portray themselves in as positive a light as possible. The info should also run both ways, however, and I seem to recall that the military does not allow the release of pictures of soldiers who were killed being repatriated to the US on a daily basis. Why? Well, they would see it as shining a negative light on their business so of course, they don't want that to happen. A bit of tit for tat going on here? As you said so well,
    propaganda is the name of the game.
    Just depends on which side of the fence you sit on doesn't it?
  • avatar Posted Jun 4, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence
    #3
    Thanks Gals.


    From my side of the fence, Congress' legislation is in direct violation of the constitution. But you know, I understand demanding responsible speech. This goes beyond demanding responsible speech, this takes a tool that has been used since the beginning of warfare from the DoD. That is like taking guns away from soldiers during a firefight and then arming the enemy. and honestly I wouldn't put it past congress to do that as well.
  • avatar Posted Jun 4, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #4
    It is all about quashing dissent and the completion of the List of 45. Be on the lookout for the Fairness Doctrine which, btw, isn't close to being "fair".
  • avatar Posted Jun 4, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence
    #5
    The list of 45? Sorry I may be out of the loop on this one.
  • avatar Posted Jun 4, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #6
  • avatar Posted Jun 4, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence
    #7
    Dang...
  • avatar Posted Jun 4, 2008 by  Johnny Simpson
    #8
    Good one, Sam.

    It's one thing when we report on a news item, but I think some of us are at our best when every sensiblity we have is offended by acts like these.

    Free speech is going to Helena Handbasket, LOL!
  • avatar Posted Jun 4, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence
    #9
    Oh it has already gone there, free speech has been tarnished by people using it to inflict harm upon other and abuse other people's rights ever since the drug induced hippy dippy days.
  • avatar Posted Jun 4, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence
    #10
    updated with link to legislation.
  • roland Posted Jun 5, 2008 by  roland
    #11
    Sorry, I disagree. Our government should be influenced by American citizens, not trying to influence or manipulate the American Citizens.
  • avatar Posted Jun 6, 2008 by  Sheba
    #12
    Ugh. That's ugly.

    Where did you get those WW II posters, Sam? You're one resourceful gal :).

    By the way, is anyone going to challenge this bill?
  • avatar Posted Jun 6, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence
    #13
    @ roland
    Sorry, I disagree. Our government should be influenced by American citizens, not trying to influence or manipulate the American Citizens.

    Soour military memebers are no longer citizens? They can no longer have a say? The military members aren't just "government" they are people. And if they want to come out and say what good things are happening, well then they shouldn't have thier right to free speech and assembly taken away because of thier job. That is called discrimination.
  • avatar Posted Jun 6, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence
    #14
    @ Sheba
    Ugh. That's ugly.

    Where did you get those WW II posters, Sam? You're one resourceful gal :).

    By the way, is anyone going to challenge this bill?

    My hubby found those posters one day while reading about World War II. He likes finding those military propaganda posters and leaflets and saves them. And it doesn't look like anyone is truly going to challenge this amendment. I think it is too broad of an amendment. They should be very specific about telling outright lies. However, if they are going to ignore misleading statements from civilians and then throw a hissy about the Pentagon presenting the other side, well it just shows me that the people in Congress who let this go through without a hitch are enemies of America and only want the negative portrayed. That is a real war tactic. People don't understand that. Congress is changing America and then legislating that no one can challenge them. And they are worried about check points in D.C. but not this.
  • avatar Posted Jun 6, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #15
    The Pentagon has been infiltrated by the Shadow Government plain and simple. Been there and done that.

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?