The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     How do I ...»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageAustralia's Great Reserve Bank Fraud, Part 1

Posted May 27, 2008 by  Tony Ryan in Politics | 9 comments | 687 views
Next in Politics
Related News
2 more articles on this subject:
Advertising
Kevin Rudd, Prime Minister of Australia must terminate the political charade and come to terms with the reality of deepening Australian poverty due to inflationary and artificial fuel and grocery prices, and contraindicated interest rate levels.
This is the first article in a 3-part series.

For some 60% of Australians life has become an ever-deepening struggle to make ends meet, and most are losing the battle. The reasons for this crisis have remained unacknowledged by Rudd and Swan, thereby denying Aussies even the comfort of hope.

Over a period of two and a half decades, incremental tariff reductions delivered the destruction of close to half our manufacturing sector, and the elimination of two thirds of family farms, with a concomitant collapse in the regional and rural economy; sequentially forcing one million Aussies to migrate to coastal cities to find jobs.

The pressure this placed on urban water resources, highways, infrastructure, and housing, was exacerbated by a disastrously high intake of migrants and refugees.

Meanwhile, a non-functioning FIRB has allowed foreign investors to openly speculate; and government has restricted supply of urban land, to broaden profit margins for election campaign-contributing developers.

Stimulated by intense urban migration, and confronted by restricted market supply, land prices have soared and home affordability has evaporated for the majority of young Aussies; most of whom must now rent. But with a critical under-supply of commercial rental homes, and the virtual elimination of the Housing Commission in all states and territories, rents have rocketed; with prospective tenants actually bidding to pay higher rents, while the losers become homeless.

In the midst of this calculated chaos, and in defiance of rational economic theory and practice, the Reserve Bank has repeatedly raised interest rates, thus precipitating thousands of mortgage defaults; and forcing still-roofed families to sacrifice food and medical care in order to save their homes.

Government, the media and banks are propagating the myth that interest rate rises hose down an overheated economy and depress consumer spending. This may well be the most convoluted piece of non-logic ever cast before a bewildered public. In the ultimate indictment of media monopoly, not one editor or journalist has even glanced in the direction of the screamingly obvious; that this entire scenario is a construct of easily exposed misrepresentations, distortions, outright lies and propaganda.

While a sanity-restoring future is still remotely achievable, Australians must come to terms with the truth. There are three main drivers of current Australian inflation. The first is fuel price rises. The second is duopoly supermarket prices. The third is interest rate rises.

Impacts are cumulative. The utterly unnecessary Iraq War has restricted oil supplies; a situation exacerbated by OPEC refusal (or incapacity) to significantly expand production. The media have targeted the Saudis as the primary culprit, yet all but the politically naïve know that the US controls Saudi Arabia, this being the very first globalised nation. In fact, transparently, the oil companies themselves are manipulating supply; once more, to force prices higher and expand already colossal profits; but also to finance alternative energy technologies. Finally, it must be said that most of the oil price structure is due to the futures market; gambling brought to the investment market.

Rising oil prices elevate production costs in all parts of industry and commerce, proportionately thrusting product prices skywards; which in turn forces increasingly desperate employees to demand wage increases to meet the expanded cost of living.

Meanwhile, Woolworths and Coles, monopolising 80% of Australian groceries, are profiteering at the expense of both producers and consumers. Simultaneously facing unfair competition from subsidised foreign corporations, Australian produce growers are going bankrupt. Once local growers have been eliminated, the subsidies will cease and produce prices will rise, ballooning the already bloated cost of living. The future looks bleak.

It is clear, therefore, that oil and supermarket profiteering is creating a production-price/wage inflationary spiral; exacerbated by a secondary tier of increased costs for everything from health care to professional services.

To divert attention away from this chain of economic destruction, collaborating media and politicians paint a daily picture of workers blowing credit on plasma TVs and other consumer items; yet our surveys show that credit cards are being used primarily to pay for electricity, phone, school fees, car registrations, clothing and footwear, groceries; car tyres, batteries, repairs and fuel. In the course of two programmes, SBS’s Insight presenter, Jenny Brockie, made the same discovery. In other words, credit is being used to cover the critical deficit in incomes, as inflation chews up once-adequate wages.

Nevertheless, although workers are struggling to survive, banks and credit companies; in concert with the advertising industry, cleverly exploit some vulnerable consumer’s psychological need to see themselves as upwardly mobile, and convince customers that with super-easy time payments they can afford a more reliable car, a new home entertainment system for their children, a computer, or replacement whitegoods. In fact, they cannot.

So what are worker’s real incomes? Academic and government sources quote ridiculous figures like $1000 per week; figures monstrously distorted by fat executive and professional salaries. Most full time workers are actually receiving between $380 and $500 per week; but those with part time jobs are earning considerably less.

A 2006 interactive questionnaire survey of a demographic corridor on the Sunshine Coast, reportedly a tourism-prosperous Australian representative population, showed that 54% of Aussies have incomes below $15,000… less than $275 per week; and 68% have incomes under $29,000. The families of most wage earners appear to receive in the vicinity of cumulative $460 per week. In the survey, participants nominated that a minimal single income should be $500 per week, and for a family of five, $1000 per week (full survey results available on request).

Unsurprisingly, the then infamous 1999 Bulletin Gallop survey presented an even more dismal picture, and a 2006 Commonwealth study into Aboriginal poverty showed that 23% of Aborigines live below the poverty line; matched against 17% of mainstream Australians. All job network managements later surveyed concurred generally with this assessment.

The human impact of these figures is that more than half of all Australians are dying in slow motion from malnutrition and lack of medical and dental care. Is there a registered nutritionist or medical practitioner who is prepared to publicly challenge this statement? The recent budget did not even pretend to address these crises. Instead, it placed the burden of an entirely spurious plan of economic recovery on those whose actual survival is most threatened: age pensioners, carers, low-paid workers and the unemployed.

With sustained unemployment 6% higher than during the Great Depression, this is clearly a human disaster dwarfing anything else in Australia’s history, and it exposes as a sadistic joke, the media and political establishment’s propaganda banner of The Booming Economy.

So can anything be done about this? The answer is a resounding, yes! To round off this first article in this series, we will glance at the most easily resolved hurdle on Australia’s road to economic recovery… the Reserve Bank must significantly lower interest rates.

The belief-system monolith of Reserve Bank independence must be demolished once and for all. The Governor is not divinely omnipotent and the bank is not independent. Frankly, we are astounded that so many Australians have fallen for this propagated myth. The Governor must comply entirely with the Australian Government’s directives; all of whose members seem to have forgotten that ultimate authority resides in the People of Australia. All arguments to the contrary must be disregarded.

If politicians have been foolish enough to sign treaties with the World Bank or IMF without mandating such action through referenda as required by the Australian Constitution, then the onus is entirely on the dishonest politicians.

Two of the most important words in the history of civilisation have not been heard in quite a while, National Sovereignty; and what these words mean is that no international organisation or alliance has supremacy over the democratic wishes of any sovereign nation. This is what we mean when we say that All Authority Resides in The People; a phrase that has had global currency since the aristocracy and their claimed supreme right to rule, were rejected forever at the time of the French, American and European revolutions.

There is a remaining range of options, to not only relieve the current intolerable stress on Australians, but to restore prosperity to once-traditional levels. Fuel prices can be lowered substantially, and the supermarket duopoly can be dismantled and prices contained. In the next article of this series we will examine details of how these strategies can be implemented.
article:255224:15::0
2 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted May 27, 2008 by  Sykos Masters
    #1
    Excellent piece Tony. I had no idea that the economic conditions were so bleak in Australia. Other than the specific data points, the conditions there are identical to those here in Canada. Unfortunately lowering interest rates have not provided the relief that our central bank may have intended. Fuel, food, and basic utility costs continue to rise while the average wage, when it does increase, does so at a much lower rate.

    I look forward to your further coverage of the crisis in Australia.
  • Tony Ryan Posted May 27, 2008 by  Tony Ryan
    #2
    Sykos Masters

    Thanks, mate. I have been noticing Canada's slide into dependency with special concern, because Canada and Australia were once partners as self-sufficient nations. We alone were in a position to thumb our nose at the globalists and provide emulative leadership for those drowning nations who also wish to extricate themselves.

    I imagine I have some vague grasp of Canada's position, but perhaps I am entirely wrong. I would be grateful if you could correct our misconceptions, because I believe such shared knowledge will be essential for us all in the future.

    NAFTA has apparently ended Canada's ability to defend its prosperity and sovereignty; not for intrinsic reasons of foreign (US) resource manipulation, but because Canadians themselves either believe every thing's fine, and that Constitutional reform will solve any problems; or if they are politically-aware losers in the game, they already believe the war is hopelessly lost. The will to fight this war for national sovereignty and prosperity seems to have gone.

    In modern times so far, only Venezuela and Bolivia have had the courage to try; and so far Venezuela is winning. Chavez clearly understands the terrain he fights on, and which weapons can penetrate the globalist armour; and has his arm outstretched to all of Central and South America.

    Individuals I chat with, from Mexico to Argentine, recognise and value his leadership. Only the elites and the global media present a different picture.

    Strategically, I believe Canada can benefit from rejection of the US from south of the border, because the envisaged American Union will fail without incorporation of the entire bi-continent. The global plan's architect, Zbigniew Brzezinski, has as good as admitted this, and has recently changed allegiances to Obama.

    Although this is never portrayed in the Murdoch media, Australia is actually in an identical position to Canada, with Australia's role in the proposed Asian-Pacific Union now expeditiously launched; even to having a Mandarin-speaking Prime Minister establishing our subordinate role as a colony of China.

    For us, there is an escape route; but as with Canada, it will only work if the majority of Australians start walking.

    On your comments about Canadian interest rate falls; this is only my personal belief, but I consider that economics is too belief-ridden to be other then a spurious science; and that it ignores the human motivation factor, and the role of global bankers in governmental behaviour.

    For example, although the US has led the world on economic theory for a century, not one economist has acknowledged that, since 1913, US financial management has been the function of the Rockefeller/Rothschild-owned Federal Reserve, at the expense of 90% of Americans.

    When the basic common denominator is in conflict with the entire national economic equation, how can a constructive formula evolve? As a transparent reality, international bankers are playing games with our governments and, hence, our economies. Until we confront the bankers, we will continue to lose.

    In my opinion, if Canada and Australia join Venezuela in openly rejecting the World Bank, WTO, IMF and BIS; economic recovery would take less than five years to achieve. As Hugo Chavez demonstrated so courageously, the word No can be the most powerful in political language.

    How would you amend this summation, Sykos Masters?
  • avatar Posted May 28, 2008 by  Chris V. (cgull)
    #3
    It seems to be a world trend. Rich is getting Richer and Poor is getting Poorer all in the name of Democracy. And the ones at the top don't care what the conditions are at the bottom even if they are their own country men.
  • Hammster Posted May 28, 2008 by  Hammster
    #4
    Having read the article and then the comments, I don’t know which was worse. I find I’m like most Americans (I’m not an economist), but I understand what it means to WORK FOR A LIVING.

    We’re (the U.S.) is ALWAYS getting the blame for world leaderships inept abilities to make tough decisions. Why are so many people trying to get here if were are the Satan of the world? Why do they measure us against what they probably never accomplish without help FROM the Untied States? (Both the these points the writer – Tony Ryan failed to mention – the U.S. gives aid to foreign countries MANY times over).

    I don’t not agree with the way BUSH allowed his cronies (Rumsfeld and Chaney) to run the war, they are both criminals, and I hope to see them both jailed for it.

    However, the in Iraq WAS NECESSARY. We (The U.S.) are a sovereign nation; a privilege the writer somehow allows for Australia but not us. IF Sadam had WMD’s Bagdad should be glowing in the dark.The chief mistake the U.S. has made in times of war has been allowing other countries and the snakes in the media to determine a war is run (Iraq is NO DIFFERENT). If any nation is attacked (and WE WERE) and have the strength and GUTS to defend itself they should!

    Tony Ryan’s comment to Sykos Masters saying, “For example, although the US has led the world on economic theory for a century, not one economist has acknowledged that, since 1913, US financial management has been the function of the Rockefeller/Rothschild-owned Federal Reserve, at the expense of 90% of Americans.” is out of line (disrespectful, smug and hateful). Again, I’m not an economist, but blaming / claiming without facts is slander! The Saudi’s can eat there oil if we’d cut 10 percent of our use (we get 41 percent of out oil from Canada – a fact not mentioned as well).

    I HAVE NEVER WORKED FOR A POOR MAN – By God’s grace I live in a free nation - The writer did seem to understand how the news media coupled with liberal government sets up a “Nanny State” – If Obama or Hillary gets the election guess who’s next to lose jobs and freedoms!

    By the way – unless something has changed in five years, I’ve saw first hand that in a GOOD WEEK the Aussies work about 28 hours (Compared to the U.S. of 43 hours average). Moan and groan for the Mates Down-under if you will, but I was ridiculed for working too much. What forward thinking business people would call planning, scheduling is an unheard of thing in Australia (and American) government. The BUDGET not mean entitlement!

    There are a lot of “Cute” little television commercials now that "Male Bash" in order to sell a product (you know the ones – they took dumb blond women and replaced them with spineless men). I saw this article and it’s comments as "America Bashing" nothing else.
  • Tony Ryan Posted May 28, 2008 by  Tony Ryan
    #5
    Hammster

    This was an article about corrupt government in Australia, and what Australians can do to rescue our nation. It is not about America; although ordinary Americans have many problems identical to ours.

    Unless I misinterpreted your post, you simply object to any statement that holds the US in a bad light. Do you actually dispute the truthfulness or accuracy of anything I say; presenting conflicting evidence?

    A few corrections, which you can then Google confirmation of:

    (1) The US is the smallest contributor of foreign aid, per capita, than any other nation on this planet. For gullible American consumption, US Government figures include all aid to Israel, which includes $32 million per day military ordnance and munitions, on top of ongoing regular support. Try reading UN, Oxfam or other more independent sources of figures.

    It was prominent conservative American Scott Ritter who first stated publicly that this kind of aid must end, as it is directly supporting and prolonging Middle East wars, and is turning the world against the US.

    (2) Many people come to America after the US has contributed to the destruction of their own nation's economies. This includes 15 million Hispanics. By the way, although I am not American, for many years I have been a supportive member of Gilchrist's Minutemen, and many of my articles on the plight of ordinary Americans have been well received in the US. But most Mexicans share my viewpoint on the US manipulation of their economy. I am not on any Government's side; just the ordinary people.

    (3) Do you understand what the word sovereign means? In illustrative terms, it means that the US has the sovereign right to protect its own borders and interests therein. Not interests thereout. This would abrogate the sovereign rights of other nations, who also have the sovereign right to protect their own borders and interests therein.

    What the US has done, since 1946, is declare the resources of 43 nations to be the interests of America; and has then militarily invaded these sovereign nations and plundered their resources. Without plebiscite or referendum, the US has now located its military bases in 130 sovereign nations; not one of whom, to my knowledge, are supported by the people of those nations. As we speak, you are actually doing this to protectorate Guam; in spite of majority resident opposition. Bush wants to do the same to Iran, but not to Israel, China or India on the exact same pretext.

    US invasions and occupations are no different from what Hitler and the Nazis did: in Poland, Hungary, France, Russia and the rest of Europe and north Africa. The US has invaded four times more nations than did Hitler.

    (4) What I said about the US Federal Reserve has never been disputed; by anyone. Your more accurately described position is that you just did not know this. Please make reasonable enquiries before accusing me of fabrication.

    (5) Oz 28 hours PW to US 43 hours PW? You really need to switch from Good Week, the GOP and Readers Digest and read something a little more reliable. Do you really think we do not work for a living? My hours over the past twenty years have ranged between 84 and 120 hours PW, and I know plenty of Aussies who do much more. I bet you love John Wayne movies.

    So, Hammster, after all that, please explain to us how America has sovereign rights and the rest of us do not?
  • Hammster Posted May 29, 2008 by  Hammster
    #6
    Your points are well taken. I paint with a broad brush (especially when I'm ticked).

    One reason I began reading Digital Journal is the contributors have something news worthy to tell, and I am mature enough to realize we don't always share the same values, life's experiences and world view. Eliminating or objecting to the Sovereign Rights of EVERY NATION was not a question in my response to the article and comments.

    I believe that "Might DOES NOT Make Right", but I would NOT compare anyone to the Nazis (except the Nazis - they are in a class of hate minded thugs all there own). Invoking the name Nazi when comes to the U.S. seems to be a reoccurring response when non-Americans want to tick us off.

    There WOULD BE NO England, France or Germany if we’d not helped about the war. To say openly militarily invaded 4X the counties that Hitler did is an inaccurate recall of history – perhaps I can get a copy of the history book you’ve been reading (I hear the liberal bent of the United Nation coming through).

    I cannot speak for any other generation but this one I’ve lived in. But to me it seems the United States chief fault has been trying to change other people’s minds (something that has been without enslavement or invasion as some accuse).

    When two nations work together the ideal would be such that one does not become a “Protectorate” (before this word became prevalent the U.S. and others were promoting “Colonialism”). I prefer freedom and fare trade to tariffs and communism (NAFTA and the corrupt government of Mexico have a long way to go to prove they are helping everyone but the wealthy people who promote it). It’ll still take working for a RICH MAN (or WOMAN) over standing in line for rationed out groceries or gasoline.

    As to how much time people in Australia work, I was wrong to imply all work the same number of hours (I apologize with qualification – those my company at the time did business with gave me a dim view – my view was poorly expressed).
    The last John Wayne movie I watched was "Rio Bravo" - Have you seen it?

    Tony you're working to help your country - think you are to be admired. Please pray for Australia as I do the U.S. and its' leadership, only GOD can change the heart.
  • Tony Ryan Posted May 30, 2008 by  Tony Ryan
    #7
    Hammster

    It seems evident that our hearts are in the same place; however our sources of knowledge often are not. Which is why, of course, forums like DigitalJournal are critical to the restoration of democracy and, ultimately, peace.

    In Australia, most of us see the controllers of the White House as very different entities to ordinary American citizens, who we see as our closest cultural cousins. As we struggle to restore democracy in our own country, we are mindful of the concerns across the Pacific, where problems are remarkably similar.

    Personally, I think the most important thing we need to remember is that we move forward shoulder to shoulder; and neither lead nor follow. That way we cannot be divided or manipulated.

    Good luck mate.
  • avatar Posted May 30, 2008 by  Sykos Masters
    #8
    Greetings gentlemen,

    Sorry about the late reply, but I've been polishing up some other articles whilst trying not to go nuclear about the FLDS crisis and the complete double-speak on the economy, and laughing my head off at the antics of our (Canada's) soon-to-be-former Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mr. Bernier .... btw I think the upcoming movie has the working title of "How the Minister Got Shafted by a Biker Babe".

    On to the issue at hand ....

    Tony ... I'm on complete agreement with you on a brighter outlook for Canada should our leaders actually grow a pair and reject the proposed enlarged 'Free Trade Zone'. NAFTA has caused nothing but grief for far too many sectors ... more importantly people in my country. The elimination of tariffs has done little more than increase subsidies, to a majority of corporate run entities, and allow inferior goods to cross both borders with less restriction and regulation. It's no different than when our neighbours south of the 49th complain about the jobs going south of their border. As far as economics goes, there is no ready solution because all the interpretations are based on 'trends' gleaned from the past. At the pace that things change in our current global economy, any data is stale by the time it's been parsed, interpreted, massaged and eventually disseminated. Economists are becoming little more useful that astrologers.

    Hammster ... I can certainly understand your frustration and well placed national pride. I would, however, ask you to see non U.S. reactions as something other than 'America Bashing'. Can you see how that very term is egotistical and shows a certain level of hubris? the U.S. is not America. What is being pointed out is the very flaw in the notion that the U.S. or any other country has the right to "change other people’s minds". Your impression of how the world would exist had the U.S. not 'saved' Great Britain, Germany and France is also part of the larger problem; you left out Japan, which according my my learning was the reason the U.S. got involved to begin with. History is written by the victors and is always subject to change. You don't have to look any further than Dubya to see that revisionist history has become the norm.

    If you're really interested in changing and improving the global view of U.S. policies and actions, thereby regaining your nation's status as defender of freedom and democracy, then encourage your family, friends and neighbors not to be asleep at the wheel during this election. Sorry, but if only 30% of the population exercises their right to vote, then you can't say the the top person won ... he (in the past) just didn't lose as badly as the other guys did.
  • Tony Ryan Posted May 30, 2008 by  Tony Ryan
    #9
    Hi Guys

    As we can see, the more we learn about each other, the more we see we are the same.

    At the end of the day, we are all worried about our families, our jobs; and a rather nasty future the self-appointed elites are setting up for us. Some describe this elite as the neo-fuedalists, which is probably as accurate as one can get.

    At the risk of trotting out 3000 year old wisdoms, the answer lies in recognising our essential commonality, and what all people need. We need freedom to pursue fulfilling lives, obtain nutritious food, create shelter, maintain health and nurture our children and relationships.

    To do this, we must control our governments, because if we don't others will. What we are doing here is engaging solidarity. We can then confront our governments eye to eye. But we also need to work from the bottom up.

    Controlling our governments is not a matter of electing some corrupt politician to do our thinking for us, but in engaging with our own neighbourhood; identifying salient issues and considering relevant information, which facilitates consensus. Thus the power of one becomes people power.

    Try it. It sounds impossible, but is actually easy. Call it a survey. All people love to be asked their opinions, and you won't encounter resistance. All people love to agree; which is why any two people agreeing always smile. We can't help it. As social animals, we are hard-wired this way.

    Unlikely as this may sound, if we do this, and convey documented consensus to our local politician; he will eventually realise we are doing his job for him. Armed with the community's direct consensus, he knows that as long as he presents this faithfully to Parliament (Congress), you will re-elect him. This is his real goal, and it won't be long before he realises that his political party is an actual obstruction to being re-elected. You have a new ally in the enemy's ranks.

    This is simple democracy, and it is infectious. Other neighbourhoods will copy; reinforcing each other.

    This is not new, and it has functioned in hundreds of cultures and civilisations for eons. Somehow, the genuine histories have disappeared; but if you can locate the writings of the 1st millennia Irish Monks, they document the people power of Europe of that era; from Finland to Ireland.

    Seeking community consensus will provide you with extraordinary confidence. This is because you will be armed with incontrovertible statistics; such as just what percentage of citizens are unemployed; what the average worker really earns; and what he or she really thinks about issues. The figures will terrify politicians and media owners, because you are using their propaganda to disarm them.

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?