Op-Ed: Labor Unions Unite To Fight Globalism

It seems pretty bizarre that in order to fight Globalism, two of the largest labor unions in England and the United States are considering merging. They are negotiating at this moment, conspiring to control labor and passing it off as fighting Globalism.

How does two labor unions from separate continents and nations merging contribute to fight Globalism? Seeing that I already have an opinion on this, I will express it. Horse pucks! That pretty much sums it up and the "elite" really must think we are stupid. This merger reeks of Globalism and to those of us that are paying attention recognize it for what it is. I have come to the conclusion that Globalism, Cultural Jihad and Vultural Jihad (American politics) are one in the same in most respects. All of them combined create environs for war. All of them become oppressive and free people don't like to be oppressed and oppressed people yearn to be free. I have also concluded that the Democrat Party Leadership is attracted to the Islamic Jihadists and vice versa because their motives and end games are identical...ultimate control of the populace in all respects. I have often written about the similarities between the American Democrat Party Leadership, Socialism, Communism and the terrorists. It is what it is and denying it doesn't make it not true...the evidence is overwhelming. Globalism is merely a new name for the New World Order that Globalists so espouse. And, labor unions are deftly married to world socialists, Soros being a prime example. It is also "Rather" evident that the Leftinistra, having failed at securing defeat for America, are now vainly attempting to compare Conservatism to oppressive tenets. It is so preposterous, it barely made a dent in Conservative Armor but this silliness must be addressed...stupidity cannot go un-addressed because we all know that NOT addressing their "udder" ignorance and stupidity is why the GOP is in the RINO state it finds itself in. Correct? Can we afford to not speak out against this tomfoolery? For some causation, the current crop of Leftinistra sycophants of willful ignorance seem to think that McCain, Bush I and Bush II are the shining examples of Conservatism and Globalism fits the mold of Conservatism. This displays a few things, two of which are they are either too young to remember what Conservatism is or they are just plain duped. It could be a lethal combination of the two mentioned. Conservatism was already compromised before 2000 when the two main contenders were Bush II and McCain. President Bush is a "compassionate conservative" which equates to a moderate liberal. One oxymoron has been replaced with another and they both mean the same thing. If the current crop of Leftinistra loathe this form of aborted conservatism, this certainly confirms the socialist leanings, dogma and tenet of the current field of "progressives" doesn't it? No matter the labels applied, Globalism is a tenet of the New World Order and that is what George Soros preaches and buys. Globalism is a rephrase and refrain of Progressivism and we all know what a progressive is, by now. Or, at least those of us paying attention know. As I have said many times, they are left of Stalin and proves that liberalism, in the long run, embraces communism. How many true conservatives are sympathetic towards Hugo Chavez and Che Guacamole? The proof is in the pudding, as it were. As a true conservative has recently stated, when 82% of the country thinks that raising taxes is bad for the economy and 4% of the country thinks that man-made Global Warming is an issue, Conservatism is not dead. Exactly the opposite is true. When Conservatives are more prominent in government, there is no talk of "socializing" health care or oil companies. That kind of talk is readily prevalent in nations such as Venezuela and other lower class nations. If the delusional and uninformed on the left want to pretend Conservatism is dead, let them. Reaganism caught them with their pants down and it will happen again because the Leftinistra NEVER learn and cannot think for themselves. Remember this as well, Ronald Wilson Reagan was the Father of neo-con. No wonder they hate him...he started out as a liberal democrat and saw the light. There is a movement to reclaim the preeminence of Conservatism and it will take place. This nation in fact is a Conservative nation, the blathering of the emotionally duped comprising the Leftinistra not withstanding. No matter the shrills to the contrary, denying it doesn't make it not true. In fact the shriller the shrills get, the more true it is. The reclaiming of Conservatism begins with the flushing of the GOP. The field is ripe for Conservatism - true Conservatism - not the whatever McCain and Bush "conservatism" is - to make a come-back. Obama and Hillary are Carteresque and history reveals what came of that. Remember to also study the List of 45. As the communists first infiltrated our political system decades ago, the socialist "progressives" and the Jihadists are utilizing the exact same list and if the Conservatives - the vast majority of Americans - don't wake up and get involved, they will deserve everything that befalls them.